What Is Politic? Essay, Research Paper

What Is Politics

On hearing the word politics, what usually springs to mind are images of

government, politicians and their policies or more negatively the idea

of corruption and dirty tricks. The actual definition seems to have been

obscured and almost lost by such representations and clich?s that tend

not to pinpoint the true essence, which defines this thing, called

politics. In order to make an attempt at a definition of politics a

systematic approach is required. To begin with, a brief historical

overview will be considered, to understand the origins of politics.

Following this, different core concepts, which are imperative to a

definition of politics, will be discussed, in the hope to discover a

true and fair interpretation of the word politics.

The word politics comes from the Greek word “polis”, meaning the state

or community as a whole. The concept of the “polis” was an ideal state

and came from the writings of great political thinkers such as Plato and

Aristotle. In his novel “The Republic”, Plato describes the ideal state

and the means to achieve it. Hence, the word politics originally has

connotations in the ways in which to create the ideal society. An ideal

society is in practice a rather difficult aim and even an impossible aim

to achieve. Politics implies measures which could and should, in the

views of their devisor, be implemented in the hope to create a better

society, than that which is already present. The very fact that Plato

and Aristotle saw imperfections in the societies in which they lived,

prompted them to write their political philosophies. These philosophies

provided the first written recognition of politics. In his writings his

“The Politics”, Aristotle states that “Man is by nature a political

animal”(The Politics, 1) in another words, it lies deep within the

instinct of man. It is almost primal. Due to his nature man should

consider and realise his role within the “polis”. So according to

Aristotle Politics is not a dreamt up concept, but rather an inherent

feature of mankind.

To begin with, the basest premise that underpins the notion of politics

should be considered in order to arrive at a fair definition. Man is

self-preserving by nature. He thinks and acts, whether that is as an

individual or as a group who share interests, with foremost regard to

his own interests. Self-perpetuation is the number one rule. He

therefore possesses his own interests, ideas and preferences, which may

differ to those of his contemporaries. In the “Blackwell Encyclopaedia

of Political Thought”, Miller supports this premise:

“Politics presupposes a diversity of view, if not about ultimate aims,

at least the best ways of achieving them”. (Miller, 1987, p.390)

Politics consider this view of man, in that on meeting others whose

interests oppose his own, conflict is bound to occur. What could be the

cause of this conflict in interest? The world has its limits; all

material wealth within it is exhaustible. Who therefore, gets how large

a share, of those resources, which are present on the earth in limited

supply? If man were permitted to act on and pursue his own selfish

interests, snatching that, which he desires, a society would quickly

become under rule of violence. Politics is a way of combating the

degradation of society into a violent and unstructured mess by reducing

it to be governed by the primitive instincts of man in order to resolve

conflict. Leftwich states in his essay entitled “Politics: people,

resources and power” from his book “What is Politics?”

“…politics compromises all the activities of co-operation and

conflict, within and between societies, whereby the human species goes

about organising the use, production and distribution of human, natural

and other resources in the production and reproduction of its biological

and social life.” (Leftwich, 1984, p.64-65)

Politics therefore may be defined a means to resolving this conflict

through various means, which will be tackled later in this essay. If

however one was to take this premise of the existence of opposing

opinions as false, conflict between individuals should never occur and

politics would not be required to resolve problems. To justify politics

however, this premise must be true and through simply considering, the

society in which we live it is evident, that conflict exists. In his

definition of politics in the “Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political

Thought” Miller advocates this view, stating that if “people (were to)

agree spontaneously on a course of action…they (would) have no need to

engage in politics.”(Miller, 1987, p.390)(Added) Thus, politics exists

due to the broad spectrum of ideas and opinions within any society.

To resolve conflicting opinions, a consensus must be agreed upon by all

parties affected. Also in “The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political

Thought”, Miller cites three methods which are a feature of politics

when resolving disagreements within society, these three elements are

“persuasion, bargaining and a mechanism for reaching a final

decision”(Miller, 1987, p.390). This means that politics tries to act as

a peacemaker by offering solution(s) to conflict to the parties involved

by means of discussion with them. The outcome will most probably require

the yielding of at least one of the parties implicated in order to meet

at a compromise. The mechanism is the way in which the parties make

their final decisions based on the scenarios with which they have been

provided. This may take the form of a vote.

How is it that the final decision made though compromise is enforceable?

For surely in order for politics to be of any use as a pacifier in

strained relations it must carry some sort of authority and power.

Politics implies power. Dahl, in Modern Political Analysis, states that:

“a political system as any persistent pattern of human relationships

that involves, to a significant extent, control, influence, power or

authority.” (Dahl, 1984, p.9-10)

Certain members of a society must have the authority over other member’s

in order to enforce civil discussion in the first place. It seems to

follow that for certain individuals to exert more power than others they

must have the support of a large proportion over those which they have

authority. Going back to the premise that man is at heart a selfish

creature, it must be true that even those in power are immune to the

effects of pursuing their own goals to a certain extent. Politics could

therefore be defined as a power struggle between those in influential

positions. Power can only be obtained by obtaining the support from as

many groups and individuals as possible. This can be achieved by

providing tempting solutions to conflicts that already exist in a

society, whether this be in a honest or dishonest way. By appealing to

members of a society with solutions to their problems and promises to

act in their interests, a group or individual can gain support and

ultimately authority over other groups and individuals. Politics could

thus be defined as a calculating art of power gain or power retention or

more simply as power struggle.

The ultimate power is found in government. Miller continues to name the

state as “the chief arena of politics, in the modern world. (Miller,

1987, p.391)

It is within this institution that all of the aforementioned takes

place. Thus, politics could be defined as the workings of government as

a guarantor to a peaceful society. The government is run by the

politicians, it is the politicians who form the ideas to hopefully

settle conflict in the society they govern. However it seems that if

politics are the working of government those societies and communities,

which do not possess a government, are devoid of politics. In Britain,

we have a government so we tend to relate the politics as the workings

of that government. However, in every community and corporation where

there is hierarchy politics must exist. In a company for example, a boss

makes decisions and resolves conflict. In a tribe, a leader makes

decisions to keep internal conflicts to a minimum and ultimately ensures

the survival of his tribe. Thus politics is present in every community

and is used to manage workings and disagreements that may occur within

any co-habitation. John Horton, contributor in Leftwich “What is

Politics?” supports this view. Horton quotes from “Rationalism in

Politics and other Essays”(1962) by Michael Oakenshott;

“Politics I take to be the activity of attending to the general

arrangements of a set of people whom chance or choice have brought

together. In this sense, families, clubs and learned societies have

their politics” (Leftwich, 1984, p.112)

Here Oakenshott acknowledges the existence of politics in all kinds of

human societies and communities, because of co-habitation. Horton

however goes on to name the state as being as possessing certain

features which make it particular from those other examples of politics

listed by Oakenshott. These features suggest the mandatory and

authoritarian nature of the state, when compared to those politics that

exist in say a sports club. Politics occurs in all kinds of communities.

Whether it be the sports club or the state government and is concerned

with devising a method of organisation and attempting to implement that

method of organisation within that community over which it acts. It is

present in these communities as a necessary measure to avoid conflict

due to those inevitable diversities in opinion and therefore ultimately

needed to promote as peaceful an existence as possible.

In the process of establishing the core concepts of this affair called

politics, it is plain to see that a brief definition is virtually

impossible. Politics is not simply an object or a single stranded idea.

It is not a concise term but rather a complicated notion, which embraces

premises, opinions, and qualities of human nature, actions and

institutions. It seems to arise in those situations where humans live in

coexistence whether that be by choice or otherwise. Any attempt at a

definition would be to confine and customise politics to suit ones own

particular views. Nevertheless, in fitting with the title of this essay

an attempt at a definition shall be made.

Politics is the means to creating a more organised and peaceful society,

by providing methods to resolve conflict that naturally occurs between

men, by means of civil discussion and rational compromise. It thus stems

the need for violence in tense situations and ultimately looks to avoid

the degradation of a community into utter chaos. Authority is the

underlying feature of politics and ensures its enforceability. Power

underpins its very existence; it is a prerequisite for politics exist.

Without authority, politics simply is not feasible. The most visible and

widely accepted example of politics is the workings of the governmental

institutions. However, although at first glance one may not be aware of

it, politics in its various forms is present wherever and whenever

humans form a community. Referring back to the views of Aristotle,

politics is an intrinsic feature of mankind.

Bibliography

Aristotle (1996) The Politics and the Constitution of Athens (Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press)

Crick, B (1992) In Defence of Politics (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson)

Dahl, R (1984) Modern Political Analysis (New Jersey: Prentice Hall)

Leftwich, A (1984) What is Politics? (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)

Miller, D (1987) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought

(Oxford: Basil Blackwell)

Plato (1987) The Republic (London: Penguin)

327