Реферат на тему Against Capital Punnisment Essay Research Paper Copyright
Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-13Поможем написать учебную работу
Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.
Against Capital Punnisment Essay, Research Paper
Copyright (c) 1996-1997 — School Sucks — http://www.schoolsucks.com
The biggest FREE School papers database on the Net!
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
FileName: 23KLH4.TXT
A Subject: 017: Law
A Title: Against capital punnisment
papers = In view of the ever-increasing violent crimes, most people think that the
re-enforcement of the death penalty is a good way to reduce the crime rate. However,
there is not many statistics may show this. For this reason, I believe that the death p
First of all, we know that no one have the right to terminate the life of another person.
From religion’s view, use of the death penalty is morally wrong. They believe that
everyone have a chance to have a new life. Hence, it also against human right. It
Besides, the death penalty is final and irreversible. In this way, an innocent people
once executed can never be brought back to life. For example, we know that there is
at least once case in recent years in Britain where an innocent person was hanged.
As Moreover, there is no evidence to show that the death penalty deters crime more
effectively than any other punishment although some people think that the restoration
of death penalty is a means to reduce the crime rate. Actually, we must know the root
of On the other hand, some people argue that the criminals are financial burden to
society. For example, it needs to build more guarded prisons if the crime rate rises.
So, this will waste the taxpayer’s money. However, this argument is irrelevant. I think
Human rights are every human’s right. So, they should be given the chance to
attribute to society for their guilty.
Other people say that most people fear death, so capital punishment serves as an
excellent deterrent. If people know that they would be sentenced to death after
committing the serious crime, they may threaten them. As a result, they would have
second tho whether the death penalty is conflicted or not. Therefore, the restoration of
death penalty is not the most effective way against the criminal.
Additionally, many people support that enforcement of capital punishment can stop
cruel criminal crimes. That means, the rate of crime may be decreasing. However, this
is not true. For example, in Thailand and Singapore, there are many evidence to
show To sum up, I strongly believe that the death penalty should not be restored. It is
inhuman and cruel punishment. Use of death penalty is a violating of the fundamental
right to life. Although the criminals have guilty, it is better to give them a chance effect
against violent crime. Therefore, we should focus our attention on rooting the causes
of crime more than the consequence of crime, that is, the restoration of death penalty.