Bartel By The Scrivener Hawthorne Essay, Research Paper

I began my Hawthorne reading task with The Birth-Mark. I picked this story

because I am familiar with the Maypole of Merrymount and Young Goodman Brown,

and I wanted to try something different. I was pleasantly surprised with The

Birth-Mark, in my mind it far surpasses the latter two stories. I think one of

the most admirable traits of Hawthorne is his ability to write as though actions

are taking place somewhere in the present. Aylmer could very well live today,

somewhere in the world with his laboratory in the backyard. Men like Young

Goodman Brown are everywhere in today?s society, and, still, there are those

who try and destroy that which they do not understand or refuse to understand

like the Puritans in The Maypole of Merrymount. The Birth-Mark grapples with the

scientific progress of the time. I think the theme of humans trying to control

nature with unfavorable results is prevalent in many works of the time, most

notably Frankenstein. The fixation that Aylmer has on Georgiana?s birthmark is

unnatural. Hawthorne correlates this quest for perfection with Aylmer?s

intentions of formulating an elixir of life and mastering the art of alchemy.

Maybe Hawthorne is drawing a parallel here between the scientists of his day

trying to control nature and by the failure of scientists to do this in the

past. Aylmer?s attempt to control nature leads to the death of his wife which

is unnecessary, she is quite content with the minor facial blemish until he

makes a big deal about it. Maybe this too is a parallel between the mass

majority being content with the state of the world and a certain few who would

like to make it better, and, in turn, destroy it. I can understand Hawthorne?s

idea. I live in constant fear of nuclear war and the technology that has made it

available. But, I am grateful for the medical advances we have today. It is a

double-edge sword. (I am not implying that Aylmer is an evil man, I do not think

he is aware of the chaos he can arouse. In fact, he is merely concerned with

progress and saving humans from their own mortality and ?humanness?.) There

is one imparticular line from the story that I sound most engaging:

Hawthorne?s description ?The scenery and the figures of actual life were

perfectly represented, but with that bewitching, yet indescribably difference,

which always makes a picture, an image, or a shadow, so much more attractive

than the original.? When I read this I stopped mid-story. This is a common

theme throughout Romantic poetry I have encountered. Immediately it reminded me

of Shelly?s ?To A Sky-Lark? and ?Ode on a Grecian Urn? by Keats. Both

of these poems describe unattainable perfection. The skylark?s song is

beautiful, but it flies so high we are unable to see the creature and hense, the

song seems to come from the heavens. In ?Ode??, Keats spends much time

describing the beauty of the grecian scene on the vase but then refutes it with

?cold pastoral?. Those two words could describe this short story. From the

outside, Aylmer thinks that everything on Georgiana would be perfect if she

didn?t have the birthmark. What he doesn?t realize is perfection is

unattainable, except in our minds. The Maypole of Merrymount describes a

maypole, and it?s significance in American history. Hawthorne creates a scene

of revelry (almost a Mardi Gras scene) and has it destroyed by the Puritans.

This story reminds me of the Christian Creation Story with the maypole being the

Garden of Eden and the Puritans being allegorical figures of Satan. Hawthorne

seems to blame the demise of the American freespirit on the Puritans. I don?t

have much to comment on this story; it is really a cut and dry case. I think

Hawthorne is harsh on the Puritans. I read somewhere that the view we have of

the Puritans today is somewhat misleading. They did not always wear black and

never laughed. Maybe to some, they did cause the utopic garden of America to be

shattered. After reading The Maypole of Merry Mount and Young Goodman Brown it

is quite obvious the contempt Hawthorne holds for the Puritans. In Young Goodman

Brown, Brown is led on a path where he encounters the devil and realizes that

everyone surrounding him in his Puritan neighborhood is evil at heart. He learns

his father and grandfather before him did the devil?s work, as well as the

women he holds with utmost admiration. Brown turns from ?Faith? (his wife in

one sense and his actual faith in another) when he learns that everything he

believed in is a sham. I feel as though I cannot write about this story without

mentioning the fact that it is a story about good and evil where evil prevails.

Goodman Brown is a weak man presumably coming from weak stock. I suppose

according to Hawthorne it is the existence of Puritan blood in his veins, which

makes him a cowardly man. He is a conformist, instead of standing against the

wrongs of his community he embraces the same fate as everyone else. The theme of

the story carries through to today?s society. Oftentimes people will join

groups or subscribe to ideologies they otherwise would not due to that fact that

so many of their kin and respected leaders do. The story made me think of

Thoreau. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau actions toward the Mexican War are the

antitheses of those that would have been done by Young Goodman Brown.