Реферат

Реферат на тему ALASKAN OIL SPILL Essay Research Paper Mike

Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-16

Поможем написать учебную работу

Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.

Предоплата всего

от 25%

Подписываем

договор

Выберите тип работы:

Скидка 25% при заказе до 8.11.2024


ALASKAN OIL SPILL Essay, Research Paper

Mike Prochaska

Oil Spills

The Issue

Oil Spills are large-scale accidental discharges of liquid petroleum products which cause pollution along shorelines. The most spectacular involved the supertankers used for oil transport, but many other ship also spill oil, and offshore drilling operations contribute a large share of the pollution.Of every million tons of oil shiped, one ton is spilled. Some of the largest spills thus far recorded involved the tanker Amoco Cadiz which spilled 1.6 million barrels of oil into the Gulf Of Mexico in 1978. The largest spill in the United states was the Exxon Valdez in Prince William Sound in March 1989. The spill in Alaska had a major effect on the environment and society of Alaska.

The state of Alaska is one of Americas leading producers of Oil, supplying about 20% of the countries output. All the feilds are on 105 public acres of land owned by the people of Alaska. Everyday 2.1 million barrels or 84 million gallons of oil are delivered to the town of Valdez for shiping. In 1989 the Exxon Valdez spilled approximately 11 million gallons of oil into the sea causing one of the most environmental disasters in the United States.

Now for some background. On March 23,1989 the 987-foot tanker called the Exxon Valdez was loaded with 1,264,164 barrels of oil. The captain, Joseph Hazelwood, had set a course to go through Prince William Sound Alaska and down the West Coast of Canada Before leaving for the trip, the Captain of the Exxon Valdez went to a bar and got drunk. So Ed Murphy, the ship’s harbor pilot took control. He directed the vessel’s speed and course setting and began to steer the ship out of the harbor towards Valdez Narrows. Murphy gave the controls back to the captain. As the ship reached the outer edge of the radar coverage area the captain radioed the Coast Guard telling them he was heading outward and increasing his speed. He also told them that he was going to divert from the main traffic lanes and angle left. But on March 24th, at midnight, the captain went through the wrong inbound land marker and at high speed hit the Bligh Reef. ” The ship climbed 500 feet out of the water on the Reef before it stoped moving. The Captain knew he could not back the ship off the reef, so he continued to try and force the tanker to go forward, by speeding up the engines and rocking back and forth. This only caused more damage to the ship and eight of the thirteen cargo compartments were damaged with dozons of holes, some the size of a truck. Oil started to spill out everywhere”(What Happened, pg.1)

At 3:19 AM at least 138,000 barrels of oil had already been lost, with 20,000 barrels escaping every hour. The Captain called in for help and was told that the ship Alyeska would be there in five and one-half hours. But help never left port until 11:00 A.M. and did not get to Bligh Reef until 2:30 PM-more then 14 hours after the accident. By 5:30 PM in excess of 240,000 barrels of oil had left the Exxon Valdez and poured into Prince William Sound. Then on March 25, nearly 48 hours later, the Exxon Baton Rouge arrived to take the remanding 1,000,000 barrels of oil from the Valdez. It took four days to empty it. Within a week 1,244 miles of shoreline was contaminated by the oil spilled from the Exxon Valdez.

“When an Oil Spill occurs, The first thing the Coast Guard does is figure out who is responsible. There are two reasons for that: first, the Coast Guard wants to make sure whoever caused the problem is held legally and financially responsible. Then, once the Coast Guard has determined the “responsible party” the Coast Guard must find out if the spiller intends to conduct the cleanup himself”(Hung, pg.2) Exxon assumed the cleanup and financial responsiblity two days after the spill and began their emergency oil spill cleanup plans.

The workers cleaned up over a thousand miles of coastline that had been contaminated by the oil. The best method used to treat the shorelines was hot and cold washing. On some beaches workers used high pressured hoses to get oil off the beach and back into the water where skimmer boats, sucked it up. They managed to pick up about 20% of the oil this way but had to be careful of the sea otters living on the beaches. This process used a lot of people and was a lot of tedious and consuming work.

The Alaskan sea otter was especially vulnerable to the oil because they lack a layer of insulation blubber. Having a lack of a thin layer of blubber allows them to groom themselves to prevent hypothermia which in turn causes them to consume the oil when they lick their skin.To save the sea otters the oil had to be removed by washing the sea otters with Dawn dishwater detergent and water. But the soap also removed the animals own oils making them susceptible to hypothermia. So a form of charcoal mix and water had to be tude fed to the animals. This mix helped them regain their own oil. To do this Exxon had to set up a special animal care unit just for Sea Otters which cost them over $80,000. But even after Sea Otters were cleaned most did not survive because of lack of fish.

Fishing is Alaska’s number one job industry and main food source. Pink Salmon and herring are the most common fish. They are both canned and exported around the world. In 1989, following the spill, the herring population droped from a mass of 300,000 tons to 17,000 tons. The herring population was killed by a virus enhanched by the oil spill.

The Pink salmon are the basis for large fisheries and play a crucial role in the ecosystem. The adult salmon returns to spawn in small tidal areas of rivers and streams. The oil from the spill moved into the rivers and streams leaving behind oily layers in the tidal areas which contaminated the eggs and juvenile salmon. These eggs covered in oil had a death rate of 65% in 1989, and 96% in 1991 and of those that hatched many developed genetic damage. Many of the juvenile pink salmon migrated through oil contaminated areas causeing them to eat whole pieces of oil or prey covered with small particles of oil . 85% of the 1990 and 1991 pink salmon season were produced in hatcheries were the eggs and baby fish were protected from the oil spill. The 1992 season was poor and less then 10 million pink salmon were harvest. Both wild and hatchery stocks were below adverage levels.

The lost of fish become a major problem for some fisherman. For example; Ross Mullins had been a fisherman for over 30 years and has not seen a good season 1988. Prior to 1988 he received 72 cents a pound for pink salmon and after paying his works he took home around $120,000. Now Mullin is going broke trying to pay for his boat. His retirement savings are gone and his marriage is destroyed. The town he lives in has been totally destroyed because its main econmy is the fish business.

But the oil spill was not a disadvantage for all the fishermen because some went to work for Exxon cleaning up the oil spill. They were paid well for their labor. Exxon also paid them for the use of their boats and equipment. Many fishermen made two to three times more money cleaning up oil then they ever made fishing.

The state of Alaska was affected more by the spill because it produces more oil then any other state in the country. About 2 million barrels is consumed each day by Americans. From that the state of Alaska receives 85% of its yearly revenue. Exxon lost 257,000 barrels which equals 10.8 million gallons of oil into the sea of which only 32,500 barrels were recovered. Thirty percent of 77,100 barrels was evaporated while 147,400 barrels were unrecoverable. During this time the oil production in Alaska decreased drastically because Exxon could not ship the oil out of the state. In fact the worldwide petrolum idustry inflation rate went up. To this day many Americans are still paying high oil prices to cover Exxon’s fines and clean up of the oil spill.

On October 8,1991 the United States District court in Alaska approved an agreement that settled the claims between the United States and Exxon Valdez for criminal violations, and recovery of damages resulting from the oil spill. Exxon agreeded to pay the United States and Alaska $900 million dollars over a period of ten years. Also as part of the criminal plea agreement the court fined Exxon $250 million dollars-the largest fine yet for an environmental crime of which $125 million was forgiven due to the fact Exxon helped clean up. Of the remaining $125 million, $50 million was paid to each Alaska and the United States. The remaining $25 million was paid into the North American Wetland Fund and victims of the Crime Act Account.

The Alasken state government received $60 million for thier help in the spill responce. About one-third went to damage assessment and to pay the 10,000 workers. The legislature approved a package of oil spill legislation that includes a $50 million spill responce fund to be tapped if spills occur in the future. They also issued orders directing the oil industry to improve tug escorts for tankers and to beef up the capabilites at Alyeska the terminals in Valdez. The state of Alaska asl suggested that the spiller should continue to be liable for the cost but the government should run the show. The coast guard’s role should be increased and pollution standards should be raised.

Current Situation

The oil from the spill is still effecting people now in 1996, 6 years after. In alaska many fisherman are still coming up empty and are about to go into banckruptcy. Also many natives have found oil just a few inchs under the ground making agriculture diffuclt. When they complained to Exxon, Exxon did a test called “Chemical Fingerprinting” which did not chemically link the oil to the spill. So Exxon claimed that it was not their oil.

The 36,000 bird carcasses recovered in the clean up were frozen in refrigerated tractor-trailers as court evidence. As lawsuits were finished and the animals were to be burned. Before incineration a man named Rohwer and his team of 10 used a $50,000 National Science Foundation grant to pick through the remains and bring 1,500 birds to Seattle. Now they are being cleaned up and perserved. Some are stuffed, some were used for their wings, and others were used for their skeletons. It cost about $100 dollars to perserve each bird which can last for centuries.

Action Sugested

The best way to prevent oilspills in the future is get the goverment to get tough on the Oil companies and make them follow the new laws. Alaska had just passed a law for double hulled tankers two year ago. Still now they have not built the double hulled tankers which are faraway. Alaska have told Exxon they need to do alot of things yet they have not done any of them.

Also another thing that can be done is a better way to clean up the oil. A long time ago they used chack and pushed the oil to the bottom. Then with the Exxon Valdez they used warm and cold washing but the best way that is just being developed now is by useing chemicals. These chemicals eat up the oil and turn the environment back to it’s original state.

“Oil development and shiping from Valdez has given us the nation’s worst environment disaster in many years. But the wreck of the Exxon Veldez was much more then an environment disaster. It also turned out to be a “thresfold event” for Alaskan and other Americans. It raised questions about America’s thirst for oil, about the industry’s credibility and abilities, about government’s policies and roles.”( Exxon Valdez Spill)

If the government does not enforce new rules and regulations on the oil industry spills like the Exxon Valdez will happen again with potentially significant economic consequences.

Annotated Biblography

Bue,Brian, “Pink in Peril:Declining Wild Stocks in Prince William Sound” Alaska’s Wildlife, Volume 25, Janurary 93, pg.34.

This article talks how the fish and fisherman were affected by the Alaskan oil spill.

Deireich,Bill. “Oil Spill Carnage Serves Science” The Seattle Times News January 17,1995 pg. 3.

This article is about how scientists are using the dead bird bodies for scientific purposes to learn about oil spills and there effects.

Hung, Jerry. Water Pollution, Encarta Encyclopedia, 1995.

Hung’s article tells about the different types of water pollution and how to control them.

King, Susan.”Film behind the Exxon Valdez Incident”.The Des Moines Register,

December 9, 1992 pg 3.

This article is about a movie shown on HBO which tells the story of the Exxon

Valdez so it will hopefully never happen again.

Oil Spill Information Center, “What happened”, Available: Internet:www.alaska.net.

Tells what happened when the Exxon Valdez spilled into Prince William Sound and the effect it had on the animals.

Oil Spill Information Center, “Five Years Later: 1995 Report on Conditionss in Prince William Sound”, Oil Spill Information center, avalible: Internet www.alaska.net/~ospic.

This article talks about how Prince Willam Sound has still not been fully fixed from the effects of the oil spill.

Oil Spill Information Center, “The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill in Prince William Sound, Oil Spill Information center, avalable: Internet www.alaska.net/~ospic.

This artilce tells Exxon Valdez’s side of the story of what happened in Alaska.


1. Контрольная работа на тему Валютный контроль в России
2. Доклад на тему Вероника лекарственная
3. Реферат на тему Effects Of Television Essay Research Paper Sitting
4. Реферат История появления фэн-шуй
5. Реферат на тему Richard III Essay Research Paper Was Richard
6. Диплом на тему Облік виробничих запасів
7. Лабораторная работа Психолого-педагогическое исследование личности с использованием специальных методик
8. Реферат Определение типов темперамента по формуле А. Белова
9. Реферат на тему Evolution Of Cultures Around The World Essay
10. Реферат Традиция перевода оперного либретто Р. Вагнера в русской художественной культуре 80-х годов ХIХ