Communist China And Mao Tse-tung Essay, Research Paper

Communist China and Mao Tse-tung

“A look into it’s introduction to Communism and the Man who led them”

DONNY CAMPBELL

Dr. UMOETTE

HISTORY OF THE FAR EAST

MAY 3rd 1996

The Roots of Communist China

To say that the Chinese Communist revolution is a non-Western revolution is more

than a clich?. That revolution has been primarily directed, not like the French

Revolution

but against alien Western influences that approached the level of domination and

drastically altered China’s traditional relationship with the world. Hence the Chinese

Communist attitude toward China’s traditional past is selectively critical, but by no

means

totally hostile. The Chinese Communist revolution, and the foreign policy of the

regime to

which it has given rise, have several roots, each of which is embedded in the past

more

deeply than one would tend to expect of a movement seemingly so convulsive.

The Chinese superiority complex institutionalized in their tributary system was

justified by any standards less advanced or efficient than those of the modern West.

China

developed an elaborate and effective political system resting on a remarkable cultural

unity, the latter in turn being due mainly to the general acceptance of a common,

although

difficult, written language and a common set of ethical and social values, known as

Confucianism. Traditional china had neither the knowledge nor the power that would

have

been necessary to cope with the superior science, technology, economic

organization, and

military force that expanding West brought to bear on it. The general sense of national

weakness and humiliation was rendered still keener by a unique phenomenon, the

modernization of Japan and its rise to great power status. Japan’s success threw

China’s

failure into sharp remission.

The Japanese performance contributed to the discrediting and collapse of China’s

imperial system, but it did little to make things easier for the subsequent successor.

The

Republic was never able to achieve territorial and national unity in the face of bad

communications and the widespread diffusion of modern arms throughout the country.

Lacking internal authority, it did not carry much weight in its foreign relations. As it

struggled awkwardly, there arose two more radical political forces, the relatively

powerful

Kuomintang of Sun Yat-sen and Chiang Kai-shek, and the younger and weaker

Communist Party of China (CPC ). With indispensable support from the CPC and the

Third International, the Kuomintang achieved sufficient success so it felt justified in

proclaiming a new government, controlled by itself, for the whole of China. For a time

the Kuomintang made a valiant effort to tackle China’s numerous and colossal

problems,

including those that had ruined its predecessor : poor communications and the wide

distribution of arms. It also took a strongly anti-Western course in its foreign relations,

with some success. It is impossible to say whether the Kuomintang’s regime would

ultimately have proven viable and successful if it had not been ruined by an external

enemy, as the Republic had been by its internal opponents. The more the Japanese

exerted

preemptive pressures on China, the more the people tended to look on the

Kuomintang as

the only force that prevent china from being dominated by Japan. During the Sino-

Japanese war of 1937, the Kuomintang immediately suffered major military defeats

and

lost control of eastern China. It was only saved from total hopelessness or defeat by

Japan’s suicidal decision to attack the United States and invasion of Southeastern

Asia.

But military rescue from Japan brought no significant improvement in the

Kuomintang’s

domestic performance in the political and economic fields, which if anything to get

worse.

Clearly the pre-Communist history of Modern China has been essentially one of

weakness,

humiliation, and failure. This is the atmosphere in which the CPC developed its

leadership

and growth in. The result has been a strong determination on the part of that

leadership to

eliminate foreign influence within China, to modernize their country, and to eliminate

Western influence from eastern Asia, which included the Soviet Union. China was

changing and even developing, but its overwhelming marks were still poverty and

weakness. During their rise to power the Chinese Communists, like most politically

conscious Chinese, were aware of these conditions and anxious to eliminate them.

Mao

Tse-tung envisioned a mixed economy under Communist control, such as had

existed in

the Soviet Union during the period of the New Economic Policy. The stress was more

upon social justice, and public ownership of the “commanding heights” of the

economy

than upon development. In 1945, Mao was talking more candidly about development,

still

within the framework of a mixed economy under Communist control, and stressing the

need for more heavy industry; I believe because he had been impressed by the role of

heavy industry in determine the outcome of World War II. In his selected works he

said

“that the necessary capital would come mainly from the accumulated wealth of the

Chinese people” but latter added “that China would appreciate foreign aid and even

private foreign investment, under non exploitative conditions.”

After Chiang Kai-shek broke away from the CPC they found themselves in a

condition that they were not accustom to, they had no armed forces or territorial bases

of

its own. It had no program of strategy other than the one that Stalin had compromised,

who from the Sixth World Congress of the Comintern in 1928 to the Seventh in 1935

insisted, largely because the disaster he had suffered in China that Communist

Parties

everywhere must promote world revolution in a time of depression. The CPC was

ridden

with factionalism; the successful effort to replace this situation with one of relative

“bolshevization” or in layman’s term this means imposed unity, which was ultimately

made by Mao Tse-tung, and not by Stalin.

Parallel with the Comintern-dominated central apparatus of the CPC in Shanghai,

there arose a half dozen Communist-led base areas, each with a guerrilla army, in

Central

and South China. These bases existed mainly by virtue of the efforts of the local

Communist leadership to satisfy the serious economic and social grievances of the

local

civilians, often violently, through such means as redistribution of land at the expense

of

landlords and the reduction of interest rates at the expense of moneylenders. Of these

base

areas, or soviets, the most important was the one led by Mao Tse-tung and centered

in the

southeastern city of Kiangsi. Correspondingly, in return for such service Mao was

elected

chairman of a Central Soviet Government, who supposedly controlled all the

Communist

base areas in 1931.

Before I tell about Mao Tse-tung, I will tell you about Maoism. By Maoism or

“the thought of Mao Tse-tung” as the CPC would put it is the entire evolving complex

of

patterns of official thought and behavior that CPC has developed while under Mao’s

leadership. It was very difficult to unscramble Mao’s individual contribution while not

confusing it with other thinkers of this time period as many have done and are still

doing

to this date. It is also difficult to separate the pre-1949 and the post-1949 aspects and

the

domestic from the international aspects. The first basic and most important

characteristic

that I believe is a deep and sincere nationalism that has been merged with the strictly

Communist elements. Then closely resembling nationalism was his populism

approach so

full of strain that the CPC saw itself not merely as the Vanguard of the common

people,

plus as the progressive side of the middle class, but as representative of the people.

This

was important as it played the opposite position of the ” three big mountains”

(imperialism, feudalism, and bureaucratic capitalism) and still yet accept the passively

the

leadership CPC. Maoism still possessed two other points that are significant in

understanding this ideology, it recognizes the decisive importance in history of

conscious,

voluntary activity and of subjective forces in more detail than the sometimes

compared

Leninism which was opposed to deterministic, objective forces. The last point it brings

out

is that Maoism stresses contradictions and struggle, or what might be called the

power of

negative thinking, to the point where it invents enemies of all types and comments on

their

size and calls them “paper tiger” as he did in a speech in 1950.

Mao Tse-tung

On December 26th 1893 in a small village about twenty-eight miles to the west of

Hsiangt’an, Hunan in Shaoshanch’ung, Mao Tse-tung was born. He was born during

a

time of widespread suffrage, his father Mao Shun-sheng had left his family to join the

army

hoping to return and be able to take care of his family. He soon returned with ample

funds

to purchase land and livestock, so was the background of his childhood and one of

the

reasons why he cared so much about the agricultural growth of his people and the

need to

end their suffering..His mother was a modest individual who cared about the less

fortunate

and believed heavily in prayer to gods for guidance and best wishes to the needy.

Since he

started working at the early age of five he learned and developed his tendency for

thoroughness, paying close attention to what and how his father operated the

farmland.

His father eventually brought him a tutor to teach the business side of life and learned

to

read and write also. Learning to read opened his mind to books such as, The Water

Margin, The Romance of the Three Kingdoms, and The Monkey, but the first book

was

his most favorite. Because it told of a rebels desire and the spirit of rebellion, what a

symbolic meaning that would play in his future. He would eventually go to school in

Ch’angsha the Capital city where his life took a path he would never be able to leave

from

again. The Empire was full of discontent with the leaders role in the political realm.

China

was in political chaos and the leaders new of nothing that could save them. During

these

times many disasters would take place such as the Russo-Japanese war, and the

Boxer

Rebellion which directed the Chinese government to construct a shaky, but

authoritative constitution to hope these problems would not destroy their monarchy. At

this time Mao had been in school learning as much as he could about the political

agenda

and about the revolution that was going on. He read many books about the causes of

the

revolution and the many theories that authors portrayed that could end this revolt. He

himself started to write his feelings down into what would be his “life works” on what

he

believed could halt the problem or really give the Republic back to the people. This is

one

of the reasons why China is now called THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA.

From

this point of his educational advance, he would be in close contact with future leaders

of

the revolution, his classmates. He helped them take papers and documents around

the city

that told of plans of attacking the government. With the help of his classmates the

formed

a student society that was a front for the revolution to reach the students, where they

read

works and newspapers such as Hsiang River Weekly, this paper would subsequently

print

some of his beliefs. This paper was eventually snubbed by the present leader Chang

Ching-

yao. This is when his name became familiar with the government and they wanted

him

stopped and suppressed. He would soon leave to go Peking where he started to

issue his

views statements about the current government. This is where he started to learn

more

about Marxism and read the book the Communist Manifesto. When he returned he

learned

of the Hunan Armies seizures of citizens who they believed where threats to the

society.

From this point on, Mao new it would be his job and role in life to take charge and

assert

the necessary precautions to see that his people were treated the way that they

needed to

be treated.

Bibliography

1. Mao Tse-tung, Selected Works, Manchuria Publishing House, 1948, Translated By

Stuart Gelder.

2. Jerome Chen, Mao and the Chinese Revolution, Oxford University Press, 1965.

3. Stuart & Schram, Mao Tse- tung, Simon and Shuster – New York, 1966.

Cf. Conrad Brandt, Stalin’s Failure in China, 1924-1927, Harvard University Press,

1958.

Mao Tse-tung, Selected Works, Manchuria Publishing House, 1948, p. 336.

Translated by Stuart

Gelder.

Mao Tse-tung, Selected Works, Manchuria Publishing House, 1948, p. 428.

Translated by Stuart

Gelder.

Mao Tse-tung, Selected Works, Manchuria Publishing House, 1948, p. 104.

Translated by Stuart

Gelder.