The World According To Liberals Essay, Research Paper

The World According to Liberals

Possessing the Key to Truth, Justice, Compassion, Sincerity and Good Intentions

Smug, arrogant, condescending; believing that they alone have good intentions; and they alone

have the heart, mind and soul to really care. All else is an imitation and an illusion.

This is the Democrat view of their political opponents. Democrat ideas and policies are the only sincere and genuine ones. They are to be the measuring stick for all else. Read their own words and discover for yourself the smug attitude liberals have about non-liberals — thinking that they are to be the measure of sincerity and compassion — and who possess a monopoly on good intentions. All imitations are to be suspect and doubted — for only liberals can truly emit sincerity and goodness.

So let voices of condescension being …

+ “The people in America who will vote against Sen. Joseph Lieberman because of his religion were already voting Republican anyway. They are the same people who are not comfortable with gays and minorities and know that Bush’s inclusiveness’ is only a show.” –Democratic pollster, Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi (speaking to the Washington Times) [NOTE: Thomas Jefferson warned us of this kind of demagoguery. Questioning motives is symptomatic of ideological and political weakness]

+ “Don’t buy into the “inclusion illusion’ from Philadelphia.” –Rev. Jesse Jackson, race-baiter extraordinaire and Castrophile [See NOTE above regarding questioning motives and intentions. Didn't you hear? Democrats have a monopoly on good intentions. All imitations are an illusion.]

The Democrat New World Order Dictionaryin+clu+sion (n-kluz-shun) — having delegates at a political convention represent population demographics by imposing quotas according to race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and other superficial human characteristics. ex+clu+sion (x-kluz-shun) — having delegates at a political convention represent party ideology; without imposing quotas or otherwise permitting superficial characteristics to play a role in composition.

+ “In fairness to Bush and his supporters, there’s no evidence any of them seriously wish to restore the American society that existed before the adoption of the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865 — that is, a society where it was legal for one human being to own another.” –Christopher B. Daly, writing in The American Prospect magazine [Gee, how big of Mr. Daly to give the GOP the benefit of the doubt. Might I remind him that it was the Democrat's beloved, benevolent, omniscient, activist Supreme Court that gave us the Dred Scott decision, which a Republican President and the Thirteenth Amendment had to correct; and that the modern Democrat Party supports another Supreme Court travesty called Roe v. Wade, which gives a woman ownership of the life of an unborn human being. And as with the travesty of Dred Scott, this too shall pass. And it will likely come about from the actions of those exclusionary, throwback Republicans.]

+ “It was disheartening to see Colin Powell up there doing his bit to help mask the reality of the GOP, a party that since the 1960s has been relentlessly hostile to the interest of black Americans.” –Bob Herbert, New York Times columnist [See NOTE above regarding questioning motives and intentions. And as is usual for liberal demagoguery, no evidence was offered for this bit of slander.]

+ “…the GOP platform calls for cultural and ethnic policies favored by the party’s fringes, belying Mr. Bush’s eloquent pleas for racial equality.” –Maureen Dowd, New York Times columnist [Another accusation desperately crying out for evidence.]

+ “…inclusion is not universal here [because] the GOP platform says, ‘We will attain equal opportunity without quotas or other forms of preferential treatment.’” –Bruce Morton, another deep-thinking talkinghead from the Clinton News Network (CNN), evidently unaware of the stupidity of his remark.

+ Children’s Defense Fund considers suing the Republican National Committee and Bush campaign over the use of trademarked motto “Leave No Child Behind.” [Read: We can't have those mean-spirited, hate-filled, compassionless Republicans allowed to dupe people with our genuine message of love, peace and justice. Did I mention that liberals are condescending, arrogant smugs?]

National Review got it right when it said the following:

+ “Republicans … [are] … damned if they do, damned if they don’t. Stage a convention without regard to race, and you are attacked as a racist. Stage one that is color-conscious, and you are attacked as a fraud. The liberals’ criticism is rich: They spend day and night demonizing the Republicans as a party antagonistic to blacks; then, having succeeded, they look on their handiwork — a party from which blacks shrink — and profess shock.” –Jay Nordlinger, August 28, 2000, page 19.

+ “There’s a curious criticism being made of George W. Bush’s attempts to appeal to minority voters. These attempts are said to be insincere. Bush is not really trying to appeal to black and Hispanic voters, the argument goes, so much as he is trying to win over white voters who want to see him make the effort. What exactly is the critics’ point? Is it that Bush does not truly want many blacks and Hispanics to vote for him? That he would prefer to get no votes from blacks or Hispanics? That it is illegitimate to offer assurances to white voters who want Bush to show that he will govern with the interests of the whole country in mind? Or is it merely that when it comes to race, no Republican good deed can go unpunished?” –The Week, August 28, 2000, page 6.