Essay On Colonies Essay, Research Paper

The New England and Southern Colonies were both settled largely by the English. By 1700, the regions had evolved into two distinct societies.

The southern colonies have characteristics that are the antithesis of the New England colonies attributes. New England was colonized for Freedom of Worship and freedom of political thought. The Southern colonies were developed for freedom of economic opportunity. The New England colonies had aspirations for a distinct society, where they could show their homeland, how a country should be run. The southern colonies had goals for mercantilism, and increasing the prosperity of England. The New England colonies were based on theocracy, where the state forced the people to live and worship in an orthodox way. The southern colonies(Virginia) had a government based on a royal government, where the state was governed by a governor and council named by the king, and an elected assembly chosen by the people. Finally, the New England colonies wanted to establish the colony for religious motives, while the southern colonies were established for economic motives.

England and the rebels of England (Pilgrims), made up the New England and southern colonies. “God Almighty in his most holy and wise providence hath so disposed of the condition of mankind, in all times some must be rich, some poor, some high and eminent in power and dignity, other mean and in subjection. Yet we must be knit together in this work as one man.”(John Winthrop, A Model of Christian Charity) This statement by John Winthrop, demonstrates importance of religion in the lives of the New England settlers. “We must delight in each other, make others’ conditions our own, rejoice together, mourn together, labor and suffer together, always having before our eyes our commission and community in the work, our community as members of the same body.” (John Winthrop, A Model of Christian Charity). The use of the word “together” and “community” indicates that the New England settlers were of a communal nature, they were less individualistic than the southern colonies. The New England colonies were based on religious freedom, thus their society was reflected the religion.

“These underwritten names are to be transported to Virginia, embarked in the Merchant’s Hope, Hugh Weston, Master, per examination by the minister of Gravesend touching upon their conformity to the Church discipline of England, and have taken oaths of allegiance and supremacy:” (Ship’s List of Emigrants Bound for Virginia). The use of the word “Master”, shows, that the southern colonies were more of a individualistic state rather than a communal state(New England). This individualism was the effect of the motivation of the southern colonies for economic opportunity.

“We whose names are underwritten, being by God’s providnce engaged together to make a plantation….” (Articles of Agreement). The New England settlers, again were of a communal nature, in how they are binding together for the good of the community. “We intend by God’s grace, as soon as we can with all convenient speed, to procure some Godly and faithful minster with whom we purpose to join in church covenant to walk in the ways of Christ.”(Articles of Agreement). The statement above, shows how the minister, was the head of the theocracy, of the small communities. Furthermore, the “Articles of Agreement”, demonstates the importance of sharing within the community. This article, was another product of the motivation of the New England settlers for religious freedom.

“This court… in the interim recommends [that] all tradesmen and laborers consider the religious end of their callings…”. The puritans believed everyone had a specific duty in life, something that one was proficient at. Almost all the mores and society itself radiated from religion, as a result, many people who couldn’t endure the rigidity of such a society were exiled and the dissenters created new societies.

“The worst[among us were the gold seekers who]with their golden promises made all men their slaves in hope of recompenses. There was no talk… but dig gold, wash gold, refine gold, load gold..” (Captain John Smith, History of Virginia). The southern colonists were a people who settled in the southern colonies for econmic motives. The people were more materialistic, and individualistic, thus greed prevailed. Conversely, the New England settlers were of a spiritual nature, and were dispassionate in materialistic matters. The drive of the southern colonists were toward economic prosperity.

“For by our nearest computation we leave at our backs as many servants(besides Negroes) as there are friedman to defend the shores and all our frontiers [against] the Indians….[This] gives men fearful apprehensions of the danger they leave their estates and families in, while they are drawn from their houses to defend the borders.”(Governor Berkeley and His Council on Their Inability to defend Virginia Against a Dutch Attack). The southern colonists were protective of their land, and were seeking more and more land. The colonists’ idea was for more economic prosperity coming from more and more land. The southern colonists were motivated for economic prosperity.

“Let us observe the sudden rise of their estates…[compared] with the quality in which they first entered this country.” (Bacons “Manifesto”). This statement shows how the southern colonists had progressed by arriving to America because of their economic motivation. The advancement is a result of economic drive toward prosperity.

The colonies were settled chiefly by the same race of people. The distinct quality that seperated the southern colonists from the New England colonists is that the motivation of the two were distinct, and as a result two colonies diverged in their goals. The southern colonists were aiming for economic prosperity; the presence of vast quantities of cheap land in America opened opportunities for economic advancement unknown in overcrowded Europe. The religious freedom was a major contribution because in Europe religious toleration was almost unknown, and dissenters were looked down upon.