Реферат на тему Tacitus Compared With Archaeological Evidence Essay Research
Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-23Поможем написать учебную работу
Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.
Tacitus Compared With Archaeological Evidence Essay, Research Paper
Tacitus compared with archaeological evidence Tacitus says that Prastugas (king of Iceni and husband of
Boudicca) died and left his tribe to be split between his daughters and Caesar.
He says that the Romans invaded the tribe and took it over as if it had been
given to them as a gift. Boudicas daughters were then raped and she was
flogged. This is the reason Tacitus gives for the revolt breaking out.
Archaeological evidence however, suggests other reasons why the revolt might
have broken out. One of these is that before the roman invasion of Britain, the
Iceni had not traded with any other part of the world, so when the romans
invaded Britain, the shock for the Iceni was much greater than for the other
British tribes. Other tribes traded with each other before the Roman invasion
but the Icenians believed it undermined their traditional values. Since the
shock was so big for the Iceni, they probably hated the Romans from the
beginning. Then, when their king died and their alliance was over, they might have
decided that they did not like the Roman rule so they decided to revolt against
it. Tacitus makes no mention of this theory, so which one is true is debatable.
??????????? Once the
Icenians had revolted then went towards Colchester to sack it. Tacitus says
that Camulodunum (now Colchester) had no walls or ditches to protect it.
Archaeological evidence backs this by showing that there were remains of the
old ditch before the romans, but no attempt to rebuild it. Tacitus says that
the reason for there being no attempt to rebuild the ditch is down to 2 things,
Firstly the Romans thought more of luxuries than Necessities, and secondly, the
plan to rebuild a ditch was thwarted by supporters of the revolution. Because
of this, when the Britons went to sack Colchester, they easily did so. The
Roman defence was not at all successful and the Romans ask Procurator Catus
Decianus who sent less than 200 badly armored men. The Britons easily destroyed
these reinforcements and the only part of the reinforcements that managed to hold
out, held out in the temple.