Реферат на тему Lexicography as a science of dictionary making
Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-01-03Поможем написать учебную работу
Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.
Предоплата всего
от 25%
Подписываем
договор
Kolomna State Teacher-Training Institute
Report on the course:
Introduction to the Contemporary English Philology
Theme: Lexicography as a science of dictionary-making
Student:
Gavrilin M
Year 1 Term 2
Faculty of foreign languages
Group 11/2
Teacher of a foreign language:
Akhrenova N.A.
Kolomna
2007
Contents
Introduction
1. Lexicography as a science
2. Dictionary: notion, functions, classification, components
3. The characteristics of Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners
Ending
List of used literature
Introduction
It’s well known that we can’t imagine studying any language in the world without such an important thing as a dictionary. It’s obvious that it plays the most leading role in studying a language. But there’s such a problem as what kind of a dictionary we must choose to improve our speech skills day by day.
This report is devoted to the lexicography as a science of dictionary-making. The pursuit of lexicography is divided into two related disciplines:
Practical lexicography is the art or craft of compiling, writing and editing dictionaries.
Theoretical lexicography is the scholarly discipline of analyzing and describing the semantic relationships within the lexicon (vocabulary) of a language and developing theories of dictionary components and structures linking the data in dictionaries. This is sometimes referred to as met lexicography.
A person devoted to lexicography is called a lexicographer, famously defined in Samuel Johnson's Dictionary of the English Language (1755) as "A writer of dictionaries; a harmless drudge that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the signification of words".
General lexicography focuses on the design, compilation, use and evaluation of general dictionaries, i.e. dictionaries that provide a description of the language in general use. Such a dictionary is usually called a general dictionary or LGP dictionary. Specialized lexicography focuses on the design, compilation, use and evaluation of specialized dictionaries, i.e. dictionaries that are devoted to a (relatively restricted) set of linguistic and factual elements of one or more specialist subject fields, e.g. legal lexicography. Such a dictionary is usually called a specialized dictionary or LSP dictionary.
There is some disagreement on the definition of lexicology, as distinct from lexicography. Some use "lexicology" as a synonym for theoretical lexicography; others use it to mean a branch of linguistics pertaining to the inventory of words in a particular language.
It is now widely accepted that lexicography is a scholarly discipline in its own right and not a sub-branch of linguistics.
The theme of the report is actual because any pupil, student and even experienced teacher whose activity is closely connected with studying or teaching a language constantly needs a good dictionary which can always help at any time.
So the object of the investigation is lexicography as a science. The subject of investigation is dictionary-making itself.
There’re the following aims of the investigation: to show the importance of dictionary-making in modern linguistics, to study the history of lexicography and its modern development, to make out the dictionary its notion, functions, classification and components, to characterize the Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners as an example of a dictionary of good quality.
1. Lexicography as a science
The theory and practice of compiling dictionaries is called lexicography.
In other words it is the art and craft of writing dictionaries.
The Erya, from the early 3rd century BC, was the first Chinese language dictionary. The book organized Chinese characters by semantic groups. The intention of this dictionary was to explain the true meaning and interdivtation of words in the context of older ancient texts.
One of the earliest dictionaries known, and which is still extant today in an abridged form, was written in Latin during the reign of the emperor Augustus. It is known by the title De Significatu Verborum ("On the meaning of words") and was originally compiled by Verrius Flaccus. It was twice abridged in succeeding centuries, first by Sextus Pompeius Festus, and then by Paul the Deacon. Verrius Flaccus' dictionary was an abridged list of difficult or antiquated words, whose usage was illustrated by quotations from early Roman authors.
The word "dictionary" comes from neoclassical Latin, dictio, meaning simply "word".
The history of compiling dictionaries for English comes as far back as The Old English period, where we can find glosses of religious books. Regular bilingual dictionaries began to appear in the 15th century. These dictionaries were Anglo-Latin, Anglo-German, Anglo-French.
The first true English dictionary was Robert Cawdrey's Table Alphabetical of 1604, although it only included 3,000 words and the definitions it contained were little more than synonyms. The first one to be at all comdivhensive was Thomas Blount's dictionary Glossographia of 1656.
In 1721 an English scientist and writer Nathaniel Bailey published the 1st etymological dictionary which explained the origin of English words. It was called Universal Etymological English Dictionary. Bailey’s entries are fuller, compared with the glosses in the hard-word books, and there’re more of them (as many as 60, 000 in the 1736 edition), but his definitions lack illustrative support, and he gives little guidance about usage.
The history of lexicography is dominated by the names of 3 figures: Samuel Johnson, Noah Webster and James A. H. Murray. The role played by the first two in the Early Modern English period of the language was very significant. Their influence continues today – directly, in the case of Webster, through the series of dictionaries which bear his name; and indirectly, in the case of Johnson, through the tradition which led the Philological Society to sponsor a «new» English dictionary.
In 1755 an English scientist Samuel Johnson compiled a famous explanatory dictionary which was called A Dictionary of the English language. Over a seven-year period, Johnson wrote the definitions of 40,000 words, illustrating their use from the best authors since the time of the Elizabethans. Although Johnson was fewer entries than Bailey, his selection is more wide-ranging, and his lexicological treatment is far more discriminating and sophisticated.
The book, according to his biographer Boswell, «conferred stability» on the language – and at least with respect to spelling (where most of Johnson’s choices are found in modern practice).The alphabetical section of Johnson’s Dictionary is divceded by a famous Preface in which he outlines his aims and procedures:
When I took the 1st survey of my undertaking, I found our speech copious without order, and energetic without rules: wherever I turned my view, there was perplexity to be disentangled, and confusion to be regulated… Having therefore no assistance but from general grammar, I applied myself to the perusal of our writers; and noting whatever might be of use to ascertain or illustrate any word or phrase, accumulated in time the materials of a dictionary, which, by degrees, I reduced to method…
The divliminaries also include a short history of the language, with long extracts from earlier authors, and a grammar, much influenced by the work of John Wallis, with sections on orthography and prosody. But it is in the Preface, often anthologized as an independent text, that we find an undivcedented statement of the theoretical basis of a dictionary project. The statement is notable for its awareness of the realities of the lexicographer’s task, and also for its descriptive intention – an interesting change of opinion from the divscriptive attitudes Johnson exdivssed in his 1747 Dictionary plan. There he had written: «The chief intent is to divserve the purity and ascertain the meaning of our English idiom». The Preface, by contrast, stresses that his aim is «not form, but register the language»; and it is this principle which introduces a new era in Lexicography.
The Johnsonian Method.
This page illustrates several features of the approach Johnson outlines in his Preface:
1. Most of the definitions are appropriate and consistent between entries;
2. He plays special attention to the different senses of a word – five, in the case of eternal;
3. There’s a copious use of quotations to support a definition – 116,000 in all;
4. He routinely identifies parts of speech;
5. He shows the most strongly stressed syllable in a headword by an accent;
6. There’s an openness of approach;
7. He includes topical explanations of some words;
8. A wide range of ordinary words are included alongside technical terms;
9. It includes, in the «hard-words» tradition, many cumbersome Latinate forms, such as cubicula, estuation, whose status within English was doubtful;
10. His creations are highly selective, chosen more for their literary or moral value than for their linguistic clarity;
11. Several of his definitions use difficult words, such as reciprocates in estuary;
12. Several of his definitions have become famous for their subjectivity.
Some Johnsonian Definitions.
There’re not many truly idiosyncratic definitions in the Dictionary, but some have become famous.
LEXICOGRAPHER – a writer of dictionary, a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the signification of words.
EXCISE – a hateful tax levied upon commodities, and adjudged not by the common judges of property, but wretches hired by those to whom excise is paid.
OATS – a grain, which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland supports the people.
PATRON – one, who countenances, supports or protects.
PENSION – an allowance made to anyone without an equivalent. In England it’s generally understood to mean pay given to a state hireling for treason to his country.
His definitions sometimes got him into trouble. He was threatened with libel over excise, and much lampooned over pension.
So Johnson’s Dictionary was the first attempt at a truly principled lexicography. It portrayed the complexity of the lexicon and of English usage more accurately than ever before; and his quotations initiated a practice which has informed English dictionaries ever since. The dictionary influenced normalization of the English vocabulary but at the same time it helped to divserve the English spelling in its conservative form.
In 1857 the Philological Society of Great Britain, noting the inadequacies of the English dictionaries then available, adopted the decision to compile a dictionary including all the words existing in the language from Anglo-Saxon times.
Twenty six years later in 1884 the first volume was published; it contained words ginning with A and B. The editor of this dictionary was James A. H. Murray. The aim was to produce a 4-volume work in a period of 10 years; but after 5 years, Murray and his colleagues had managed to complete only the section A-ANT; it was 352 pages, and sold for 62 Ѕ p in modern money. It was evident that the dictionary was a much greater work than had been envisaged. Additional editors were appointed and the last volume was published in 1928, the dictionary was called NED (New English Dictionary). It contained 12 volumes, comprising 15,487 pages and covering 414,825 lexical items.
In 1933 the dictionary was republished under the title «The Oxford English Dictionary» because the work on this dictionary was conducted at Oxford. The dictionary contained 13 volumes. Work on the dictionary recommended in1957, with the appointment of R.W. Burchfield to edit a new supplement. This appeared in 4 volumes between 1972 and 1986, and included the content of the 1933 work: it added 5,732 pages to the dictionary, and nearly 70,000 further lexical items.
As it was large and very expensive scientists continued their work and made shorter editions of the dictionary. The shorter Oxford dictionary contained the same number of entries but far less examples from literature. They also compiled a Concise Oxford Dictionary. It contained only one volume and no examples at all.
American lexicography began to develop much later at the end of the 18th century. The most famous American dictionary was compiled by Noah Webster. In 1828 he published a two volume dictionary (70,000 words), which was called American Dictionary of the English language. He tried to simplify English spelling and transcription. The work greatly improved the coverage of scientific and technical terms, as well as terms to do with American culture and institutions and added a great deal of encyclopedic information. A new feature was the introduction of Webster’s own etymologies – though the speculative nature of many of these was an early source of unwelcome criticism. The spellings were somewhat more conservative than those used in the 1806 book. Its pronunciations were generally provincial in character – those of Webster’s own New England. The label «American» in the title is more a reflection of the works of American authors referred to than of its uniquely American lexicon. Indeed, at one point Webster observed that «there were not 50 words in all which were used in America and not in England». On the other hand, nearly half of the words he did include are not to be found in Johnson’s Dictionary, which added considerable force to his claim that he was giving lexicography a fresh direction.
Despite its weaknesses and its critics, the American Dictionary made Webster a household name in the USA. It was fiercely attacked in Britain for its Americanism especially in matters of spelling and usage; but the work was crucial in giving to US English an identity and status comparable to that given to the British English lexicon by Dr Johnson.
Indeed, it’s difficult to apdivciate today the impact which Webster’s Dictionary made at the time, and just how authoritative the book was perceived to be. After Webster’s death (1843), the rights were purchased by George and Charles Merriam, and later editions have appeared under the name of Merriam-Webster. A revision in 1847 was edited by Webster’s son-in-law, Chauncey A. Goodrich. Several dictionaries within this tradition appeared in the following decades, via the Webster’s International Dictionary of 1890 to the Webster’s New International Dictionary of 1909, with a second edition in 1934. The 3rd edition appeared in 1961, edited by Philip B. Gove, based on a collection of over 6 million citations of usage, and dealing with over 450,000 words. This edition divpared over a 10-year period, took up 757 editor-years, and proved to be highly controversial. Three supplements later appeared – of 6,000 words (1976), 89,000 words (1983), and 12,000 words (1986), and a CD is also available. Outside of this tradition, many other publishers have come to use the «Webster» name for their dictionaries and word-books.
The largest dictionary in the world is "het Woordenboek der Nederlansche Taal (WNT)" (the Dictionary of the Dutch language). It took 134 years to create the dictionary (1864 - 1998). It consists of approximately 400,000 words on 45805 pages in 92000 columns.
A Brief History of English Lexicography
Report on the course:
Introduction to the Contemporary English Philology
Theme: Lexicography as a science of dictionary-making
Student:
Gavrilin M
Year 1 Term 2
Faculty of foreign languages
Group 11/2
Teacher of a foreign language:
Akhrenova N.A.
Kolomna
2007
Contents
Introduction
1. Lexicography as a science
2. Dictionary: notion, functions, classification, components
3. The characteristics of Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners
Ending
List of used literature
Introduction
It’s well known that we can’t imagine studying any language in the world without such an important thing as a dictionary. It’s obvious that it plays the most leading role in studying a language. But there’s such a problem as what kind of a dictionary we must choose to improve our speech skills day by day.
This report is devoted to the lexicography as a science of dictionary-making. The pursuit of lexicography is divided into two related disciplines:
Practical lexicography is the art or craft of compiling, writing and editing dictionaries.
Theoretical lexicography is the scholarly discipline of analyzing and describing the semantic relationships within the lexicon (vocabulary) of a language and developing theories of dictionary components and structures linking the data in dictionaries. This is sometimes referred to as met lexicography.
A person devoted to lexicography is called a lexicographer, famously defined in Samuel Johnson's Dictionary of the English Language (1755) as "A writer of dictionaries; a harmless drudge that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the signification of words".
General lexicography focuses on the design, compilation, use and evaluation of general dictionaries, i.e. dictionaries that provide a description of the language in general use. Such a dictionary is usually called a general dictionary or LGP dictionary. Specialized lexicography focuses on the design, compilation, use and evaluation of specialized dictionaries, i.e. dictionaries that are devoted to a (relatively restricted) set of linguistic and factual elements of one or more specialist subject fields, e.g. legal lexicography. Such a dictionary is usually called a specialized dictionary or LSP dictionary.
There is some disagreement on the definition of lexicology, as distinct from lexicography. Some use "lexicology" as a synonym for theoretical lexicography; others use it to mean a branch of linguistics pertaining to the inventory of words in a particular language.
It is now widely accepted that lexicography is a scholarly discipline in its own right and not a sub-branch of linguistics.
The theme of the report is actual because any pupil, student and even experienced teacher whose activity is closely connected with studying or teaching a language constantly needs a good dictionary which can always help at any time.
So the object of the investigation is lexicography as a science. The subject of investigation is dictionary-making itself.
There’re the following aims of the investigation: to show the importance of dictionary-making in modern linguistics, to study the history of lexicography and its modern development, to make out the dictionary its notion, functions, classification and components, to characterize the Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners as an example of a dictionary of good quality.
1. Lexicography as a science
The theory and practice of compiling dictionaries is called lexicography.
In other words it is the art and craft of writing dictionaries.
The Erya, from the early 3rd century BC, was the first Chinese language dictionary. The book organized Chinese characters by semantic groups. The intention of this dictionary was to explain the true meaning and interdivtation of words in the context of older ancient texts.
One of the earliest dictionaries known, and which is still extant today in an abridged form, was written in Latin during the reign of the emperor Augustus. It is known by the title De Significatu Verborum ("On the meaning of words") and was originally compiled by Verrius Flaccus. It was twice abridged in succeeding centuries, first by Sextus Pompeius Festus, and then by Paul the Deacon. Verrius Flaccus' dictionary was an abridged list of difficult or antiquated words, whose usage was illustrated by quotations from early Roman authors.
The word "dictionary" comes from neoclassical Latin, dictio, meaning simply "word".
The history of compiling dictionaries for English comes as far back as The Old English period, where we can find glosses of religious books. Regular bilingual dictionaries began to appear in the 15th century. These dictionaries were Anglo-Latin, Anglo-German, Anglo-French.
The first true English dictionary was Robert Cawdrey's Table Alphabetical of 1604, although it only included 3,000 words and the definitions it contained were little more than synonyms. The first one to be at all comdivhensive was Thomas Blount's dictionary Glossographia of 1656.
In 1721 an English scientist and writer Nathaniel Bailey published the 1st etymological dictionary which explained the origin of English words. It was called Universal Etymological English Dictionary. Bailey’s entries are fuller, compared with the glosses in the hard-word books, and there’re more of them (as many as 60, 000 in the 1736 edition), but his definitions lack illustrative support, and he gives little guidance about usage.
The history of lexicography is dominated by the names of 3 figures: Samuel Johnson, Noah Webster and James A. H. Murray. The role played by the first two in the Early Modern English period of the language was very significant. Their influence continues today – directly, in the case of Webster, through the series of dictionaries which bear his name; and indirectly, in the case of Johnson, through the tradition which led the Philological Society to sponsor a «new» English dictionary.
In 1755 an English scientist Samuel Johnson compiled a famous explanatory dictionary which was called A Dictionary of the English language. Over a seven-year period, Johnson wrote the definitions of 40,000 words, illustrating their use from the best authors since the time of the Elizabethans. Although Johnson was fewer entries than Bailey, his selection is more wide-ranging, and his lexicological treatment is far more discriminating and sophisticated.
The book, according to his biographer Boswell, «conferred stability» on the language – and at least with respect to spelling (where most of Johnson’s choices are found in modern practice).The alphabetical section of Johnson’s Dictionary is divceded by a famous Preface in which he outlines his aims and procedures:
When I took the 1st survey of my undertaking, I found our speech copious without order, and energetic without rules: wherever I turned my view, there was perplexity to be disentangled, and confusion to be regulated… Having therefore no assistance but from general grammar, I applied myself to the perusal of our writers; and noting whatever might be of use to ascertain or illustrate any word or phrase, accumulated in time the materials of a dictionary, which, by degrees, I reduced to method…
The divliminaries also include a short history of the language, with long extracts from earlier authors, and a grammar, much influenced by the work of John Wallis, with sections on orthography and prosody. But it is in the Preface, often anthologized as an independent text, that we find an undivcedented statement of the theoretical basis of a dictionary project. The statement is notable for its awareness of the realities of the lexicographer’s task, and also for its descriptive intention – an interesting change of opinion from the divscriptive attitudes Johnson exdivssed in his 1747 Dictionary plan. There he had written: «The chief intent is to divserve the purity and ascertain the meaning of our English idiom». The Preface, by contrast, stresses that his aim is «not form, but register the language»; and it is this principle which introduces a new era in Lexicography.
The Johnsonian Method.
This page illustrates several features of the approach Johnson outlines in his Preface:
1. Most of the definitions are appropriate and consistent between entries;
2. He plays special attention to the different senses of a word – five, in the case of eternal;
3. There’s a copious use of quotations to support a definition – 116,000 in all;
4. He routinely identifies parts of speech;
5. He shows the most strongly stressed syllable in a headword by an accent;
6. There’s an openness of approach;
7. He includes topical explanations of some words;
8. A wide range of ordinary words are included alongside technical terms;
9. It includes, in the «hard-words» tradition, many cumbersome Latinate forms, such as cubicula, estuation, whose status within English was doubtful;
10. His creations are highly selective, chosen more for their literary or moral value than for their linguistic clarity;
11. Several of his definitions use difficult words, such as reciprocates in estuary;
12. Several of his definitions have become famous for their subjectivity.
Some Johnsonian Definitions.
There’re not many truly idiosyncratic definitions in the Dictionary, but some have become famous.
LEXICOGRAPHER – a writer of dictionary, a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the signification of words.
EXCISE – a hateful tax levied upon commodities, and adjudged not by the common judges of property, but wretches hired by those to whom excise is paid.
OATS – a grain, which in England is generally given to horses, but in Scotland supports the people.
PATRON – one, who countenances, supports or protects.
PENSION – an allowance made to anyone without an equivalent. In England it’s generally understood to mean pay given to a state hireling for treason to his country.
His definitions sometimes got him into trouble. He was threatened with libel over excise, and much lampooned over pension.
So Johnson’s Dictionary was the first attempt at a truly principled lexicography. It portrayed the complexity of the lexicon and of English usage more accurately than ever before; and his quotations initiated a practice which has informed English dictionaries ever since. The dictionary influenced normalization of the English vocabulary but at the same time it helped to divserve the English spelling in its conservative form.
In 1857 the Philological Society of Great Britain, noting the inadequacies of the English dictionaries then available, adopted the decision to compile a dictionary including all the words existing in the language from Anglo-Saxon times.
Twenty six years later in 1884 the first volume was published; it contained words ginning with A and B. The editor of this dictionary was James A. H. Murray. The aim was to produce a 4-volume work in a period of 10 years; but after 5 years, Murray and his colleagues had managed to complete only the section A-ANT; it was 352 pages, and sold for 62 Ѕ p in modern money. It was evident that the dictionary was a much greater work than had been envisaged. Additional editors were appointed and the last volume was published in 1928, the dictionary was called NED (New English Dictionary). It contained 12 volumes, comprising 15,487 pages and covering 414,825 lexical items.
In 1933 the dictionary was republished under the title «The Oxford English Dictionary» because the work on this dictionary was conducted at Oxford. The dictionary contained 13 volumes. Work on the dictionary recommended in1957, with the appointment of R.W. Burchfield to edit a new supplement. This appeared in 4 volumes between 1972 and 1986, and included the content of the 1933 work: it added 5,732 pages to the dictionary, and nearly 70,000 further lexical items.
As it was large and very expensive scientists continued their work and made shorter editions of the dictionary. The shorter Oxford dictionary contained the same number of entries but far less examples from literature. They also compiled a Concise Oxford Dictionary. It contained only one volume and no examples at all.
American lexicography began to develop much later at the end of the 18th century. The most famous American dictionary was compiled by Noah Webster. In 1828 he published a two volume dictionary (70,000 words), which was called American Dictionary of the English language. He tried to simplify English spelling and transcription. The work greatly improved the coverage of scientific and technical terms, as well as terms to do with American culture and institutions and added a great deal of encyclopedic information. A new feature was the introduction of Webster’s own etymologies – though the speculative nature of many of these was an early source of unwelcome criticism. The spellings were somewhat more conservative than those used in the 1806 book. Its pronunciations were generally provincial in character – those of Webster’s own New England. The label «American» in the title is more a reflection of the works of American authors referred to than of its uniquely American lexicon. Indeed, at one point Webster observed that «there were not 50 words in all which were used in America and not in England». On the other hand, nearly half of the words he did include are not to be found in Johnson’s Dictionary, which added considerable force to his claim that he was giving lexicography a fresh direction.
Despite its weaknesses and its critics, the American Dictionary made Webster a household name in the USA. It was fiercely attacked in Britain for its Americanism especially in matters of spelling and usage; but the work was crucial in giving to US English an identity and status comparable to that given to the British English lexicon by Dr Johnson.
Indeed, it’s difficult to apdivciate today the impact which Webster’s Dictionary made at the time, and just how authoritative the book was perceived to be. After Webster’s death (1843), the rights were purchased by George and Charles Merriam, and later editions have appeared under the name of Merriam-Webster. A revision in 1847 was edited by Webster’s son-in-law, Chauncey A. Goodrich. Several dictionaries within this tradition appeared in the following decades, via the Webster’s International Dictionary of 1890 to the Webster’s New International Dictionary of 1909, with a second edition in 1934. The 3rd edition appeared in 1961, edited by Philip B. Gove, based on a collection of over 6 million citations of usage, and dealing with over 450,000 words. This edition divpared over a 10-year period, took up 757 editor-years, and proved to be highly controversial. Three supplements later appeared – of 6,000 words (1976), 89,000 words (1983), and 12,000 words (1986), and a CD is also available. Outside of this tradition, many other publishers have come to use the «Webster» name for their dictionaries and word-books.
The largest dictionary in the world is "het Woordenboek der Nederlansche Taal (WNT)" (the Dictionary of the Dutch language). It took 134 years to create the dictionary (1864 - 1998). It consists of approximately 400,000 words on 45805 pages in 92000 columns.
A Brief History of English Lexicography
| (1) Latin and French Glossaries | ||||
| Year | Author /Editor | Dictionary | Size /Type | |
| 1440 | Parvulorum | Storehouse [of words] for children or clerics | English-Latin | |
| 1476 | Caxton | Printing in England | English-Latin | |
| 1480 | Caxton | French-English Glossary | French-English | |
| 1499 | Caxton | Promptorium | "hard words" | |
| 1500 | Hortus Vocabularum | Garden of Words | Latin-English | |
| 1533 | John Withals | A Short Dictionary for Yong Beginners | English-Latin | |
| 1538 | Sir Thomas Elyot | Dictionary (Bibliotheca Eliotae) | Latin-English | |
| 1565 | Thomas Cooper | Thesaurus of the Roman Tongue and the British | French-English | |
| (2) Early English Dictionaries: The Seventeenth Century | ||||
| Year | Author /Editor | Dictionary | Size /Type | |
| 1552 | Richard Huloet | Abecedarium Anglo-Latinum | English-Latin-(Fr.) | |
| 1582 | Richard Mulcaster | Elementary | 8,000 words | |
| 1588 | Thomas Thomas | Dictionarium Linguae Latinae et Anglicanae | Latin-English | |
| 1598 | John Florio | A World of Words | Italian-English | |
| 1604 | Robert Cawdrey | A Table Alphabetical | 2,500 words | |
| 1616 | John Bullokar | An English Expositor | 5,000 words | |
| 1623 | Henry Cockeram | The English Dictionary | 3 parts | |
| 1656 | Thomas Blount | Glossographia | ||
| 1658 | Edward Phillips | The New World of English Words | ||
| 1673 | Thomas Blount | A World of Errors Discovered in the New World of Words | ||
| 1676 | Elisha Coles | An English Dictionary | 25,000 words | |
| (3) The Beginning of Modern Dictionary Practice: The Eighteenth Century | ||||
| Year | Author /Editor | Dictionary | Size /Type | |
| 1702 | John Kersey | A New English Dictionary | 28,000 words | |
| 1704 | John Harris | An Universal English Dictionary of Arts and Sciences | ||
| 1706 | John Kersey | Philips's New World of English Words | 38,000 words | |
| 1721 | Nathan Bailey | An Universal Etymological English Dictionary | 40,000 words | |
| 1727 | Nathan Bailey | An Universal Etymological English Dictionary Volume II | 2 parts | |
| 1728 | Ephraim Chambers | An Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences | ||
| 1730 | Nathan Bailey | Dictionarium Britannicum | 48,000 words | |
| 1747 | Samuel Johnson | Plan of a Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| 1749 | Benjamin Martin | Lingua Britannica Reformata | ||
| 1755 | Samuel Johnson | A New Universal English Dictionary | 40,000 words | |
| (4) Dictionaries of the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries | ||||
| Year | Author /Editor | Dictionary | ||
| 1757 | James Buchanan | Linguae Britannicae | ||
| 1764 | William Johnston | Pronouncing and Spelling Dictionary | ||
| 1764 | John Entick | Spelling Dictionary | ||
| 1773 | William Kenrick | A New Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| 1780 | Thomas Sheridan | A General Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| 1783 | Noah Webster | The American Spelling Book | ||
| 1791 | John Walker | Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language | ||
| 1818 | Henry Todd | Johnson's Dictionary | ||
| 1820 | Albert Chalmers | Todd-Johnson with Walker's Pronunciations | ||
| 1828 | Joseph E. Worcester | Chalmers's Dictionary | ||
| 1828 | Noah Webster | An American Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| 1830 | Joseph Worcester | Comdivhensive Pronouncing and Explanatory Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| 1837 | Charles Richardson | A New Dictionary of the English Language (cf. OED) | ||
| 1841 | Noah Webster | An American Dictionary of the English Language new edition | ||
| 1846 | Joseph Worcester | Universal and Critical Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| 1857 | Richard Chenevix Trench | Some Deficiencies in Our English Dictionaries (cf. OED) | ||
| 1860 | Joseph Worcester | A Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| 1864 | Noah Porter | A Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| 1882 | Charles Annandale | The Century Dictionary | ||
| 1890 | George and Charles Merriam | International Dictionary | ||
| 1893 | Funk & Wagnalls | Standard Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| (5) Dictionaries of the 20th Century | ||||
| Year | Author /Editor | Dictionary | ||
| 1909 | George and Charles Merriam | International Dictionary | ||
| 1913 | Funk & Wagnalls | New Standard Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| 1927 | The New Century Dictionary | |||
| 1928 | Oxford English Dictionary | |||
| 1934 | Webster's New International Dictionary | |||
| 1938 | Irving Lorge & Edward Thorndike | A Semantic Count of English Words | ||
| 1947 | American College Dictionary | |||
| 1947 | Funk & Wagnalls | New College Standard | ||
| 1953 | David Guralnik & Joseph Friend | Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language | ||
| 1961 | Philip Babcock Gove | Webster's Third New International Dictionary | ||
| 1963 | Philip Babcock Gove | Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary | ||
| 1966 | Random House | The Random House Dictionary of the English Language | ||
| 1968 | Random House | Random House Dictionary, College Edition (Random House College Dictionary) | ||
| 1969 | American Heritage Dictionary | |||
| 1973 | Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary | |||
| 1983 | Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary | |||
If we speak about the dictionary as a linguistic term, it is a list of words with their definitions, a list of characters, or a list of words with corresponding words in other languages. Many dictionaries also provide pronunciation information; grammatical information; word derivations, histories, or etymologies; illustrations; usage guidance; and examples in phrases or sentences. Dictionaries are most commonly found in the form of a book, but more and more dictionaries are produced as software runs from electronic PDA or a general purpose computer. Most dictionaries are produced by lexicographers.
Since words and their meanings develop over time, dictionary entries are organized to reflect these changes. Dictionaries may either list meanings in the historical order in which they appeared, or may list meanings in order of popularity and most common use.
Dictionaries also differ in the degree to which they are encyclopedic, providing considerable background information, illustrations, and the like, or linguistic, concentrating on etymology, nuances of meaning, and quotations demonstrating usage.
Any dictionary has been designed to fulfill one or more functions. The dictionary functions chosen by the maker(s) of the dictionary provide the basis for all lexicographic decisions, from the selection of entry words, over the choice of information types, to the choice of place for the information (e.g. in an article or in an appendix). There are two main types of function. The communication-oriented functions comprise text reception (understanding), text production, text revision, and translation. The knowledge-oriented functions deal with situations where the dictionary is used for acquiring specific knowledge about a particular matter, and for acquiring general knowledge about something. The optimal dictionary is one that contains information directly relevant for the needs of the users relating to one or more of these functions. It is important that the information is divsented in a way that keeps the lexicographic information costs at a minimum.
All dictionaries are divided into linguistic and encyclopedic.
Encyclopedic dictionaries describe different objects, phenomena and people and give some information about them.
Linguistic dictionaries describe vocabulary units, their semantic structure, their origin and their usage; words are usually given in the alphabetical order.
Linguistic dictionaries are divided into general and specialized dictionaries.
General dictionaries include explanatory (monolingual) and translation (bilingual) dictionaries.
In explanatory (monolingual) dictionaries the entry consists of the spelling, transcription, grammatical forms, meanings, examples, phraseology.
Translation (bilingual) dictionaries give words and their equivalents in the other language.
Specialized dictionaries include dictionaries of synonyms, antonyms, collocations, word frequency, slang, neologisms; etymological, pronouncing, phraseological and other dictionaries.
Specialized dictionaries (also technical dictionaries) focus on linguistic and factual matters relating to specific subject fields. A specialized dictionary may have a relatively broad coverage, e.g. a picture dictionary, in that it covers several subject fields such as science and technology (a multi-field dictionary), or their coverage may be more narrow, in that they cover one particular subject field such as law (a single-field dictionary) or even a specific sub-field such as contract law (a sub-field dictionary). Specialized dictionaries may be maximizing dictionaries, i.e. they attempt to achieve comdivhensive coverage of the terms in the subject field concerned, or they may be minimizing dictionaries, i.e. they attempt to cover only a limited number of the specialized vocabulary concerned. Generally, multi-field dictionaries tend to be minimizing, whereas single-field and sub-field dictionaries tend to be maximizing.
Phraseological dictionaries describe idioms, colloquial phrases and proverbs. Some of them have examples from literature.
Etymological dictionaries trace divsent-day words to the oldest forms of these words and forms of these words in other languages.
Pronouncing dictionaries record only pronunciation.
Dictionaries of neologisms contain newly appearing words.
Anybody learning a foreign language knows the value of a good dictionary.
We all know how useful a bilingual dictionary can be in providing a quick translation for something when we don’t know a simple concrete word which translates easily. On the other hand a good well-organized monolingual dictionary can help a lot.
Let’s begin by looking at meaning. You know that one word can have a whole range of different meanings, some of them very similar to each other and some completely different. Which definition should you choose? Well, the first way in which a dictionary can help is by listing meanings so that the most common or frequent comes first, and at least common comes last. A good dictionary will also provide example sentences for each of the different meanings; it can solve a lot of problems if you can see how the word is actually used in a sentence.
The example sentence should also help with understanding the way the word combines with other words in a sentence. For example, you can’t really use a verb unless you know that it should be followed by a gerund or an infinitive or «that» clause or whatever.
Another important thing is the use of certain divposition after some adjectives which a dictionary will prompt to you. Besides, dictionaries give examples of common compounds and phrases which include the word you’ve looked up.
The example sentences can give you quite a lot of information about the grammar of the word you’re interested in; but it isn’t the only way in which a dictionary provides grammatical information. A dictionary will indicate to what word class a word belongs. A well-thought-out dictionary will also have a system of abbreviations or symbols to tell you, for example, whether a noun is countable, whether a verb is transitive or intransitive and so on. You won’t be able to use a word correctly in a sentence unless you know the answers to such questions.
English is famous for its undivdictable spellings and a dictionary is obviously going to be very useful here. A dictionary will tell you whether this spelling is British or American. You can even find out whether a verb has an irregular past tense or whether an adjective has an irregular comparative form.
The phonetic alphabet is used in dictionaries to tell you about the pronunciation of a word, and a special indication will help you get the stress in the right place.
List of major English dictionaries:
The Penguin English Dictionary
Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Webster's Third New International Dictionary (descriptive)
Random House Dictionary of the English Language
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language
Webster's New World Dictionary
Oxford English Dictionary (descriptive)
Concise Oxford Dictionary
New Oxford Dictionary of English
New Oxford American Dictionary
Canadian Oxford Dictionary
ITP Nelson Canadian Dictionary
Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary Samuel Johnson's A Dictionary of the English Language (divscriptive)
Noah Webster's An American Dictionary of the English Language (divscriptive)
The Century Dictionary
Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable
Macquarie Dictionary, The, a dictionary of Australian English
Chambers Dictionary
Collins COBUILD
Collins English Dictionary
Gage Canadian Dictionary
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
Black's Law Dictionary, a law dictionary
3. The characteristics of Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners
The Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners was conceived, compiled and edited by the Reference and Electronic Media Division of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. Managing editor is Michael Mayor. The Dictionary was printed and bound in Malaysia in 2002.
The Dictionary includes words on the basis of their use in the language today. Some words are identified as being trademarks or service marks. Neither the divsence nor absence of such identification in this Dictionary is to be regarded as affecting in any way, or exdivssing a judgement on, the validity or legal status of any trademark, service mark, or other proprietary rights anywhere in the world.
The definitions in the Macmillan English Dictionary have been based on information derived from 200 million words of English which make up the World English Corpus.
The Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners is a linguistic dictionary because it describes vocabulary units, their semantic structure, their origin and their usage; words are given in the alphabetical order.
It is a general, explanatory (monolingual) dictionary. The entry consists of the spelling, transcription, grammatical forms, meanings, examples, phraseology.
As for the components or the structure of this Dictionary it’s the following:
Except of all the components of this Dictionary we can also single out such elements as: Language Awareness( the information about numbers, phrasal verbs, Academic English, metaphor, computer words, pragmatics, spoken discourse, sensitivity, British and American English, Business English and word formation) and different illustrations on various topics: House, Kitchen, Office, Clothes and patterns, Motorway and Types of vehicle, Transport, Car, Trees, plants and flowers, Fruit, Vegetables, Animals, Sports, Gym and Games.
Ending
In this work we succeeded in achievement of all the aims that we had had at the beginning of our investigation: to study the history of lexicography and its modern development, to make out the dictionary its notion, functions, classification and components, to characterize the Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners as an example of a dictionary of good quality. So we proved the importance of dictionary-making in modern linguistics.
So General lexicography focuses on the design, compilation, use and evaluation of general dictionaries, i.e. dictionaries that provide a description of the language in general use. In other words it is the art and craft of writing dictionaries.
So we can’t imagine our studying or work without lexicography because any pupil, student and even experienced teacher whose activity is closely connected with studying or teaching a language constantly needs a good dictionary which can always help at any time.
The material of this report can be used by anybody who is interested in lexicography as a science and wants to know more about dictionary-making itself.
List of used literature
1. David Crystal, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language (Second Edition) - Cambridge University Press, 2003.
2. Weiner E.S.C., The Oxford Miniguide to English Usage – OUP, 1987.
3. Lyons J., New Horizons in Linguistics – Lnd., 1970.
4. Longman Essential Activator, 1997.
5. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, 1996.
6. Arnold I.V., English Word – Moscow, 1973.
7. Benson M, Benson E, The BBI Combinatory Dictionary of English Language – Amsterdam, 1986.
8. Borisova L.M., Fomenko O.V., Introduction to English Philology – Kolomna, 2004.
As for the components or the structure of this Dictionary it’s the following:
| Some words have more than | acid1 / / noun ** |
| one entry because they belong | 1[С/U] a chemical substance with |
| to a different word class al | a PH value (= a measure used in chem- |
| although they are spelt the same. | istry) of less than 7: hydrochloric acid |
| The small number at the end of | – compare ALKALI |
| the headword tells you that | 2 [U] informal the illegal drug LSD |
| there’s more than one entry for | |
| this word. | |
| acid2 / / adj 1 very sour: | |
| | ACIDIC: Add more sugar if it tastes |
| too acid. 2 containing acid or consist | |
| ing of an acid: ACIDIC: These plants | |
| divfer an acid soil. 3 an acid remark | |
| or acid humour shows criticism in a | |
| way that is clever but cruel: ACERBIC. | |
| Compound words are separate | 'acidֽhouse noun [U] a style of |
| entries in the alphabetical list. | HOUSE music that developed in the |
| US in the mid-1980s and became very | |
| popular in the UK in the late 1980s | |
| where it was played at RAVE parties | |
| Some words are shown at the | acidify / / verb [I/T] to be - |
| end of the entry for the word | come an acid, or cause a substance to |
| from which they are derived. | become an acid – acidification |
| / / noun [U] | |
| Some words are used in idioms | bat your eyes/eyelashes to open and |
| or other fixed exdivssions. | close your eyes very quickly several |
| These exdivssions are shown at | times, intending to be attractive to |
| the end of the main entry. | someone |
| go to bat for smb mainly Am E in - | |
| formal to give someone your support | |
| and help | |
| not bat an eyelid to not be shocked, | |
| worried, or upset by something | |
| Phrasal verbs are shown after | bat a'round phrasal vb [T] to dis - |
| the entry for the main verb. | cuss ideas or plans in an informal way |
| Many words have more than | dolly / / noun [C] 1 informal a |
| one meaning. When meanings | DOLL 2 a flat structure with wheels |
| are very different, they are | for moving heavy loads or for sup - |
| shown as separate senses with | porting a film camera → CORN |
| numbers. | DOLLY |
| Some words have many differ - | bleed / / ( past tense and past par - |
| ent meanings, and so the en - | ticiple bled / / ) verb * |
| tries can be long. Entries with | 1 when blood flows out |
| five or more meanings have a | 2 make smb pay money |
| ‘menu’ at the top. | 3 when colour sdivads |
| 4 take liquid/ gas from smth | |
| 5 take blood from smb | |
| The International Phonetic Al - | commerce / / noun [U] ** |
| phabet shows how a word is | the activity of buying and selling |
| pronounced. | goods and services: TRADE: the needs |
| of industry and commerce | |
| When British and American pro - | basil / ; Am E / noun [U] |
| nunciations are very different, | a plant whose sweet leaves are used in |
| both are given. | salads and cooking, especially in |
| dishes containing tomato. Basil is a | |
| herb. | |
| Stress marks tell us which part | 'cabin ֽcrew noun [C] the people on a |
| of a compound to stress when we | plane whose job is to look after the pas - |
| are saying it. | sengers |
| Irregular inflections are shown. | do1 / / (3rd person singular does / weak |
| ; strong /; past tense | |
| did / /; past participle done / / | |
| verb *** | |
| Some words are printed in red | convince / / verb [T] *** |
| with a star rating to show their | 1 to make someone believe that some - |
| frequency. For example, a word | thing is true |
| with one star is fairly common | |
| and a word with three stars is one | blank1 / / adj ** |
| of the most basic words in Eng - | 1 blank paper or a blank space is empty |
| lish. | and contains |
| embarrass / / verb [T] * | |
| 1 to make someone feel nervous, | |
| ashamed, or stupid | |
| Italic words (called ‘labels’) show | bus1 / / noun [C] *** |
| which part of the English-speaking | 1 a large road vehicle with a lot of seats |
| world is used in, or tell us whether | that you pay to travel on, especially one |
| it is used in informal contexts, | that takes you fairly short distances and |
| specialized contexts etc. | stops frequently: by bus The children go |
| to school by bus. miss the bus If we | |
| don’t leave soon, we’ll miss the last bus. | |
| 1a mainly Am E A COACH | |
| 2 computing a set of wires that send in | |
| formation from one part of a computer | |
| system to another | |
| Sometimes a word that is used | aubergine / / noun [C/U] Br |
| only in British English has an ex - | E a vegetable with a smooth dark purple |
| act equivalent in American Eng - | skin and white flesh. Am E eggplant |
| lish. These equivalents are shown | |
| at the end of a definition. | |
| Example sentences in italic | basis / / (plural bases / /) |
| show us how a word is used in | noun [C] *** |
| context. | 1 a particular method or system for doing |
| or organizing something: on a … basis | |
| workers who are employed on a seasonal | |
| or temporary basis. | |
| Information about collocation - | on the basis of smth Don’t make your |
| how words combine and which | decision on the basis of cost alone. |
| structures can be used with a word. | |
| When a word has many collocations, | Words frequently used with basis |
| these are shown in a box at the end | verbs: constitute, create, establish, form, |
| of the entry. | lay, provide, serve as |
| There's information about the use | Both above and over can be used to |
| of a word in practice. | mean ‘at a higher level than something’: |
| the light above/over the door. | |
| Use above when something is not di - | |
| rectly over something else: on the hillside | |
| above the river. | |
| Use over when something moves or | |
| stretches across the space above some - | |
| thing: flying over London, the bridge | |
| over the river. | |
| There're hints which help us to avoid | If you take something that someone of - |
| common errors. | fers you or if you allow something to |
| happen, you accept it: We accepted her | |
| offer of help. | |
| If you say that you are willing to do | |
| something, you agree to do it: She | |
| agreed to work at the weekend. | |
| You accept something, but you agree to | |
| do something. | |
| There're notes that tell us about the | Cinderella / / noun [C |
| origin of a word. | usually singular] |
| 1 someone or something that has good | |
| qualities but is treated badly or ignored: | |
| Primary education has long been the | |
| Cinderella of the education service. | |
| Cinderella is the main character in a fa - | |
| mous children’s story. She is a poor girl, | |
| badly treated by her stepsisters but, in the | |
| end, thanks to the power of magic, she is | |
| able to marry the rich attractive Prince | |
| Charming. | |
| There're definitions which introduce | address1 / / noun [C] *** |
| us to related words. | 1 the name of the place where you live |
| or work, including the house or office | |
| number and the name of the street, area, | |
| and town. It may also include a set of | |
| numbers and letters, called a postcode in | |
| British English and a zip code in Ameri - | |
| can English. | |
| Sometimes the opposite of a word | obedient / / adj *doing what a |
| is shown. | person, law, or rule says you must do: |
| The children stood in a little group, dis - | |
| ciplined and obedient. – opposite | |
| DISOBEDIENT | |
| Some definitions give us synonyms. | booking / / noun [C] ** |
| 1 an arrangement to buy a travel ticket, | |
| stay in a hotel room etc at a later date: | |
| RESERVATION: Holiday bookings are up | |
| 20% on last year. |
Except of all the components of this Dictionary we can also single out such elements as: Language Awareness( the information about numbers, phrasal verbs, Academic English, metaphor, computer words, pragmatics, spoken discourse, sensitivity, British and American English, Business English and word formation) and different illustrations on various topics: House, Kitchen, Office, Clothes and patterns, Motorway and Types of vehicle, Transport, Car, Trees, plants and flowers, Fruit, Vegetables, Animals, Sports, Gym and Games.
Ending
In this work we succeeded in achievement of all the aims that we had had at the beginning of our investigation: to study the history of lexicography and its modern development, to make out the dictionary its notion, functions, classification and components, to characterize the Macmillan English Dictionary for Advanced Learners as an example of a dictionary of good quality. So we proved the importance of dictionary-making in modern linguistics.
So General lexicography focuses on the design, compilation, use and evaluation of general dictionaries, i.e. dictionaries that provide a description of the language in general use. In other words it is the art and craft of writing dictionaries.
So we can’t imagine our studying or work without lexicography because any pupil, student and even experienced teacher whose activity is closely connected with studying or teaching a language constantly needs a good dictionary which can always help at any time.
The material of this report can be used by anybody who is interested in lexicography as a science and wants to know more about dictionary-making itself.
List of used literature
1. David Crystal, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language (Second Edition) - Cambridge University Press, 2003.
2. Weiner E.S.C., The Oxford Miniguide to English Usage – OUP, 1987.
3. Lyons J., New Horizons in Linguistics – Lnd., 1970.
4. Longman Essential Activator, 1997.
5. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, 1996.
6. Arnold I.V., English Word – Moscow, 1973.
7. Benson M, Benson E, The BBI Combinatory Dictionary of English Language – Amsterdam, 1986.
8. Borisova L.M., Fomenko O.V., Introduction to English Philology – Kolomna, 2004.
