Реферат на тему Is The Gulf War Syndrome Real Essay
Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-01Поможем написать учебную работу
Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.
Is The Gulf War Syndrome Real? Essay, Research Paper
Is the Gulf War Syndrome Real?
On August 2, 1990, Iraq invaded Kuwait. The United States government acted
very quickly. Ships were dispatched to the Persian Gulf, and oil prices shot up as and oil
embargo was placed against Iraq. The U.S. government told us that Saddam Hussein was
poised to invade the neighboring countries, including Saudi Arabia, and the worlds oil
supply was threatened. George Bush launched operation “Desert Shield” in which a
coalition of many nation’s armies gathered in the deserts of Saudi Arabia bordering Iraq
and Kuwait.
As the war began, the coalition of national armies assembled in Saudi Arabia took
a few SCUD missile shots fired from Iraq. When the troops started moving in, Sadam’s
army turned and tried to get out of Kuwait. The Iraqi “Republican Guard” stayed safely
back, far from the fighting. Several hundred U.S. troops died in the brief battle, and ten’s
of thousands of Iraqis died. Many, if not most, of the U.S. deaths were the result of
“friendly fire”.
At this point, George Bush decided to bring the troops home. UN weapons
inspectors converged on Iraq and the coalition armies dispersed. Perhaps the most hyped
war in history was now over. It was almost certainly the war most orchestrated for the
media. All the troops had been drilled for months in preparation for a tremendous battle
and possibly chemical and biological weapons. Suddenly it was over. They were sent home
and returned to their normal everyday lives. Memories of the threat of chemical and
biological weapons remained.
Years pass before rumors begin to surface, a veteran suddenly died for no known
cause there was a veteran who developed an enormous tumor and there was a veteran
who’s new child is severely malformed. The threat of chemical and biological weapons
returns to everyone’s memory. People start thinking that perhaps this is the cause of all
these illnesses.
The threat seemed very real. If it could be demonstrated that Gulf War
veterans are suffering from the effects of chemical or biological weapons, they might have
grounds for some restitution from the United States government, or perhaps the Iraqi
government. Organizations began to form in response to rising concern over the plight of
Gulf War veterans.
Official Pentagon numbers show a total of 697,000 U.S. citizens took part in the
Gulf War, but they may not include non-military members. About 6 percent of Gulf War
veterans have reported an ailment they believe is linked to their service. The Pentagon
found that 85 percent had ailments or diseases with known causes not linked to the Gulf
War.
Further Defense Department research is focusing on the slightly less than 1 percent
of all Gulf War veterans, whose ailments could not be diagnosed. Their problems included
headache and memory loss, fatigue, sleep disorders, and intestinal and respiratory
ailments. These have come to be known as the symptoms of Gulf War Syndrome.
The Gulf War Syndrome is nothing more than a hearsay. It is a disease in which
all of the science involving it is replaced by rumor. The opinions or real medical experts
are replaced by the opinion of veterans who believe they are now medical experts.
There have been accounts of symptoms such as: aching muscles, aching joints,
abdominal pain, facial pain, chest pain, blood clots, flushing, night sweats, blurry vision,
photosensitivity, jaundice, bruising, shaking, vomiting, fevers, sinus growths, irritability,
fatigue, swollen lymph nodes, weight loss, weight gain, loss of appetite, heartburn, nausea,
bad breath, hair loss, graying hair, rashes, sore throat, heart disease, diverticulitis and
other intestinal disorders, kidney stones, a growth in the eye, tingling and itching
sensations, sore gums, cough, cancer, diarrhea with and without bleeding, constipation,
testicular pain, epididymitis, unspecified swelling, memory loss, dizziness, inability to
concentrate, choking sensation, depression, lightheadedness, hot and cold flashes, labored
breathing, sneezing, sensitive teeth and other dental problems, neurological disorders,
nasal congestion, bronchitis, leg cramps, twitching, hemorrhoids, thyroid problems, welts,
rectal and vaginal bleeding, colon polyps, increased urination, a “bulging disk” in the neck,
hypertension, blood in urine, insomnia, headaches, and “a foot fungus that will not go
away.
There have been more believable examples such as in the case of Michael Adcock.
Adcock died in 1992 from lymphoma, which is cancer of the lymph glands, which then
spread to the rest of his body. He thoroughly believed that he had contracted the
lymphoma by being exposed by something in the war.
His story was very believable, and the media attentively reported the story. But
the Army Surgeon General reported that he had suffered from rectal bleeding, which is the
first symptom of lymphoma, shortly after arriving to the war. And it is well known that
lymphomas take as much as 10 or more years to develop. And Adcocks occurred in a
very short time. But Adcock and his family still blamed it on the Gulf War.
There have also been many reports of occurrences such as birth defects caused by
Gulf War Syndrome. One of Nightline’s reporters said “In Waynesville, Mississippi, 13 of
15 babies born to returning members of a National Guard Unit were reported to have
severe and often rare health problems.” However, Nighline did not explain that the report
was prepared by the parents of the babies.
The Mississippi Department of Health did and investigation on the alleged cases of
birth defects and found that the 54 major and minor birth defects to returning Gaurdsmen
in the state were well within the predicted range. There were also no more symptoms of
low birth weight children than would be expected.
Several miscarriage and birth defect investigations had searched for abnormal rates
among the offspring of the veterans. They have found no evidence whatsoever. The
children of Gulf war veterans and children of comparable soldiers have been analyzed, and
they have the exact same percentage of birth defects.
There have also been cases such as with Denise Nichols. She gave testimony
before Congress that she had transmitted Gulf War Syndrome to one of her children. She
claimed that her own daughter, had been diagnosed with congenital cataracts, after her
return from the Gulf War. But she did not understand that congenital means “from or at
birth”. Basically her doctor had told her daughter had told her that her daughter did not
receive her cataracts as a result of her mothers war duty. She was born with the problem.
There have also been many claims of cancer among veterans. Such as Dick
Foster’s of the Rocky Mountain News. He claimed that William L. Marcus’s
congressional testimony in June 1996 had claimed that Gulf War veterans have a cancer
rate of three to six times that of the normal civilian population. But the data Marcus had
given were not for cancers as a whole, but for multiple myeloma. Which is a cancer of the
bone marrow. Marcus had not given any overall figures on cancer.
CDC Director David Satcher later sent a letter with information explaining in
detail why the data from Marcus was “no adequate to sees whether service in the Gulf
War resulted in increased risk for tumors or death from cancer”. A representative of the
VA testified that the data was too limited not only to say just how many Gulf War
veterans had cancer, but also to determine what a normal rate of cancer would be.
After this, Marcus’s data was useless. Marcus is not an epidemiologist or
statistician, he is an EPA toxicologist that did his own calculations. He did not author a
study that has appeared in a peer reviewed journal, he has authored no study at all. The
only actual data found is that by the end of 1996, there were 52,000 veterans that had
been medically evaluated, and only two had been diagnosed with multiple myeloma.
Most of what pushes the Gulf War Syndromes myth is the very simple: if
something happens after a given event, it must have been caused by the event. The Gulf
War Syndrome fallacy is basically like this: the veterans were healthy wen they went to
the war, but now they are sick. Therefore, it must have be ill because of something in the
Gulf War.
There have been many claims of different causes of the Gulf War Syndrome. Such
as: experimental drugs, flies, vaccines, scud fuel, and Aflatoxin. It is becoming very
common for someone to say that one thing is definitely the cause, then later on to insist
that something else is definitely the cause of Gulf War Syndrome. Nightline had a Gulf
War Syndrome show which without a doubt showed that Gulf War Syndrome was real
and that it was spreading. They first claimed that it was caused by nerve gas. Then they
blamed the pyridostigmine bromide pills that the veterans had taken. Then later on they
blamed it on the fumes from the oil wells. None of these could cause symptoms that are
communicable.
According to Rep. Evans, “The commonality of experiences that (Gulf War
veterans) have faced seem to be fairly convincing that they are suffering serious problems .
. .” But experts note that they have very little commonality at all. Rather, the list of
symptoms is both huge and diverse, quite the opposite of what one would expect if they
had a single cause. Indeed, the net has been cast so wide as to include even medical
problems of soldiers’ spouses. One soldier speaking at a congressional hearing described
how his wife is “beginning to suffer pains in her joints.”
But there are many who firmly believe that the nerve gas is the cause of Gulf War
Syndrome. The firing of mustard gas and nerve gas was one of the biggest fears of many
soldiers on the line. So many of the veterans seeking a cause for their symptoms decided
that they must have been gassed. There are now some veterans who say that they
remember being gassed, but none of them reported to clinics at the time. And an IOM
report states, “there are no confirmed reports of clinical manifestations of acute never
agent exposure.”
Then there was the news that sarin nerve gas weapons were blown up at
Khamisiyah with U.S. troops three miles away. This gave new aid to the chemical
weapons theory. Sarin gas is an organophosphate. A report on Possible Effects of
Organophosphate Low Level Nerve Agent Exposure was later released. The report
states, “ The concept of low agent exposure is not realistic. These are highly bolatile
substances and disappear quickly, it is hard to imagine an open air situation in which low
concentrations would not disappear to zero levels within moments.”
The report also surveyed the scientific literature on nerve gas exposure. Among
these was a test on over 1,400 subjects, and the National Academy of Sciences panel
concluded there were no long term effects. The subjects were exposed to a range of gas
levels from low, symptomless doses too those that would cause acute illness. Also
another report showed that on 297 cases of accidental exposure among workers
manufacturing nerve agents found that about a fifth had symptoms, but all eventually
returned to work fully functional. But all of this data has been virtually ignored by the
media.
I have come to the conclusion of why there are so many ill Gulf veterans. It is
very simple, because there are so many Gulf veterans. There are 697,000 veterans, plus
their spouses and children. This equals well over a million people. With an amount of
people this large, there is going to be basically every illness known. Persian Gulf veterans
are not having any illnesses at an extraordinary rate. There are no more deaths, no more
cancers, no more birth defects, and no more miscarriages than that of the public.
The Gulf War veterans are having these problems because everyone has these
problems. The only difference is that the media has convinced them that there neighbors
illness is just an illness, but their illness is Gulf War Syndrome.
References
Fumento, Michael, Raising Fears of Gulf War Vets,
(The Washington Post, August 16, 1999)
Fumento, Michael, Gulf Lore Syndrome, (Reason Magazine,
March 1997)
Fumento, Michael, Gulf War Syndrome and the Press,
(The Wall Street Journal, March 4, 1997)
Fumento, Michael, What Gulf War Syndrome?, (The
American Spectator, May 1995)
Fumento, Michael, False Alarms, (Forbes Media Critic,
Fall 1994)
Fumento, Michael, Gulf War Syndrome, (Investors Business
Daily, August 1994)
Fumento, Michael, Is the Gulf War Syndrome Real?, (Investor’s
Business Daily, November 25, 1993)
Fumento, Michael, With Gulf War Syndrome, No Disease Is
No News, (Bridge News, January 7, 2000)
Fumento, Michael, The Times Adds to Gulf War Syndrome
Hysteria, (The Washington Times, April 14, 1999)
Fumento, Michael, Gulf Syndrome Kills Babies – NOT, (Copyright
1998 by Michael Fumento) http://www.fumento.com/gulf2.html
Bibliography
References
Fumento, Michael, Raising Fears of Gulf War Vets,
(The Washington Post, August 16, 1999)
Fumento, Michael, Gulf Lore Syndrome, (Reason Magazine,
March 1997)
Fumento, Michael, Gulf War Syndrome and the Press,
(The Wall Street Journal, March 4, 1997)
Fumento, Michael, What Gulf War Syndrome?, (The
American Spectator, May 1995)
Fumento, Michael, False Alarms, (Forbes Media Critic,
Fall 1994)
Fumento, Michael, Gulf War Syndrome, (Investors Business
Daily, August 1994)
Fumento, Michael, Is the Gulf War Syndrome Real?, (Investor’s
Business Daily, November 25, 1993)
Fumento, Michael, With Gulf War Syndrome, No Disease Is
No News, (Bridge News, January 7, 2000)
Fumento, Michael, The Times Adds to Gulf War Syndrome
Hysteria, (The Washington Times, April 14, 1999)
Fumento, Michael, Gulf Syndrome Kills Babies – NOT, (Copyright
1998 by Michael Fumento) http://www.fumento.com/gulf2.html