Реферат на тему A Pair Of Silk Stockings Essay Research
Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-03Поможем написать учебную работу
Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.
A Pair Of Silk Stockings Essay, Research Paper
A Pair of Silk Stockings
Mrs. Sommers, of Kate Chopin’s “A Pair of Silk Stockings” faces a major Man-vs.-Society
conflict. She is a perfect example of how humans are tempted by material gain, “the life of luxury”, and
the vicious way society judges things (or people). Society views people who live in the lap of luxury as
“gods”, they are above those who are not so fortunate. Anyone can fall prey to this common societal
problem, even innocent “Little Mrs. Sommers”. This is evident when she can feel the fifteen dollars in
her porte-monnaie and she says “it gave her a feeling of importance such as she had not enjoyed for
years”.
At first Kate Chopin portrays Mrs. Sommers as an innocent little lady who believes in “family
first”. This is apparent when Mrs. Sommers “walks about in a dreamy state” contemplating what to buy
and ends up with a huge plan to make her little brood look “fresh and dainty”. To those around her, Mrs.
Sommers is this innocent family lady. However, the minute she buys the silk stockings is the minute she
becomes a different Mrs. Sommers. All of a sudden everything she has in not good enough, she looks at
her shopping bag as “shabby” and “old”. Her parcel is “very small”. At this point, she wants more. She
begins to think without reason, and loses her sense of responsibility when she puts the stockings on in the
ladies room. Mrs. Sommers is “not going through any acute mental process or reasoning with herself”,
she is “not thinking at all” at this point.
Mrs. Sommers’s mind is not working like it used to at the beginning. All of a sudden nothing is
too expensive, she eats the expensive restaurant, buys shoes, gloves, and magazines “such as she had
become accustomed to read in those days”. These things give Mrs. Sommers a “feeling of assurance, a
sense of belonging to the well-dressed multitude”. Now, she is one of those rich important people, and
everyone knows it, thanks to all the material things she has. This becomes evident when Chopin says
“She was fastidious, and she was not too easily pleased”.
The end of the play signifies the end of Mrs. Sommers’s “luxurious times”. Mrs. Sommers is lost
with all the other “gaudy” women, when, “like a dream ended”, the play ends, and Mrs. Sommers is struck
by reality. The reality that she is not one of them at heart, she is merely Little Mrs. Sommers. To the
man on the cable car Mrs. Sommers looks like “another one of those rich women”, when internally, there
is a “powerful longing, a poignant wish to go on and on” that goes undetected by the average individual.
When the man, representing the average individual, is looking at her, it becomes apparent that because of
material things, people can seem to be something (or someone) they are not. So, in conclusion, just
because society views something as “the right way”, or “the best kind”, it does not mean that it is the right
way or the best kind. Like Mrs. Sommers, humans will almost always pay for being followers.