Socrates And Maintaining A Harmony What Is Right And Expression Of Opinions Essay, Research Paper

Socrates and Maintaining a Harmony What is Right and Expression of Opinions

Socrates has thoroughly justified his own decision to obey the opinions of the

majority and serve out the sentence that his own city has deemed appropriate

for his crimes. At the beginning of this piece, Socrates has presented a

period of questions and answers through dialogue with Crito. Throughout the

dialogue Socrates is explaining his reasoning for not running from the

government. Crito does not understand the madness of Socrates, Crito will do

whatever it takes to help his friend to flee, instead of being exiled by the

government. AI do not think that what you are doing is right, to give up your

life when you can save it, and to hasten your fate as your enemies would hasten

it, and indeed have hastened it in their wish to destroy you.@(Crito p.58c)

Throughout the begining of the dialog, Crito is expressing his feelings of why

he believes Socrates should flee from the city. Crito makes many valid points

on why he disagrees with Socrates decision to bare this misfortune. Crito

offers to do on not fleeingbeing majorints expressing to Socrates, that a man

as courageous as Socrates and who has lived his life through virtue . AYou seem

to me to choose the easiest path, whereas one should choose the path a good and

courageous man would choose, particularly when one claims throughout one’s life

to care for virtue.@(Crito p.59d) Through the dialogue the questions and

answers within Socrates and Crito establish to major themes in which hold true

throughout the work. The first being that a person must decide whether the

society in which one lives has a just reasoning behind it’s own standards of

right and wrong. The second being, that a person must have pride in the life

that he or she leads. In establishing basic questions of these two concepts,

Socrates has precluded his own circumstance and attempted to prove to his

companion Crito, that the choice that he has made is just. AI am the kind of

man who listens only to the argument that on reflection seems best to me. I

cannot, now that this fate has come upon me, discard the arguments I used; they

seen to me much the same.@(Crito p.59b) The introduction of this work has

also provided the concept that it is our society or majority that has dictated

what is considered virtuous action. According to Socrates we have been given

every opportunity to reject our society and renounce what it has stood for and

against. ANot one of our laws raises any obstacle or forbids him, if he is not

satisfied with us or the city, if one of you wants to go and live in a colony or

wants to go anywhere else, and keep his property.@ (Crito p.63d) Socrates

states; that making a conscious choice or effort to remain under the influence

of a society is an unconscious agreement with that society to live your life by

it’s standards and virtues.

Socrates states after establishing his own agreement with his city’s virtues

that he believes in the validity of the decision imposed upon himself. He

states that his decision is justified by the fact that the laws and governing

agents of the society must command a certain degree of respect. Any person who

would unjustly disobey these laws creates a deliberate attempt to destroy them,

as well as, the society which has imposed them. For example; AHowever, that

whoever of you remains when he sees how we conduct our trials and manage the

city in other ways, has in fact come to an agreement with us to obey our

instructions.@ (Crito p.63e) If the decisions of the city’s governing agents

are not thoroughly respected as just and cohesive parts of society, the very

structure by which the society stands is subject to collapse. If a person is

found to be in violation of what his or her society stands for and does not

accept the consequences for his or her actions, then there can not be a system

of law in place to create order. A You must either persuade it or obey its

orders, and endure in silence whatever it instructs you to endure, whether

blows or bonds, and if it leads you into war or be wounded or killed you must

obey.@(Crito p.63b) The society in which a person lives creates a mutual

relationship in which every person in that society is indebted to, if he or she

willingly accepts that society for their own.

Following along these basic concepts, Socrates then adapts them to his own

circumstances Crito, his companion , has presented to Socrates . The option to

escape from his captors and renounce their decision on his fate. Socrates view

in Crito’s suggestion to escape is one in which Crito begins to understand.

Socrates suggests. AI mean the majority of men. For us, however, since our

argument leads to this, the only valid consideration is whether we should be

acting rightly in giving with the escape, or whether in truth we shall do wrong

in doing all this.@ (Crito p.61c) Socrates has concluded that if he were to

follow Crito’s advice he would be committing several wrong actions against a

society in which he calls his own. The first of these being his own forebears.

To disobey your own society, according to Socrates, is to betray what you were

taught to be right by the virtues of your own parents. And what they held to

be true, your fore fathers brought you into a society that they believed to be

profound and just. AIs your wisdom such as not to realize that your country is

to be honored more then your mother, your father, and all your ancestors, that

is more to be revered and more sacred, and that it counts for more among the

gods and sensible men, that you must worship it, yield to it and placate it’s

anger@.(Crito p.63b) To renounce these virtues would be a disgrace. ADo you

think you have the right to retaliation against your country and it’s law? That

if we undertake to destroy you and think it right to do so you can undertake to

destroy us@(Critop. p.63b), you who truly cares for virtue. This would be a

disgrace against your own families legacy and the dreams that they hold for you,

and your future. Society, in the day of Socrates has only requested for two

things in return for the fulfillment and prophesizing of morally correct virtue

The choice has been made very clear, to either persuade society that it has

acted unjustly, or to do as society has asked without hindrance or complaint.

The person who has disobeyed according to Socrates has done neither one. @We

say that the one who disobeys does wrong in three ways, first, because in us he

disobeys his parents, also those who brought him up, and in spite of his

agreement, he neither obeys us nor, if we do something wrong does he try to

persuade us to do better@. (Crito p.63e) This person only serves to justify

their own decisions, actions, and foregoes the utterances of those who gave them

the life they have renounced.

Socrates then states that by remaining a member of your society, you have in

fact accepted the society as your own. He uses himself as the only example and

states that by living in his own city and choosing that city to raise a family.

Socrates states, ADid you choose us and agree to be a citizen under us. Also,

you have had children in this city, thus showing that it was congenial to you.

Then your trial you could have assessed your penalty at exile if you wished, and

you are now attempting to do against the cit’s wishes what you could have done

with her consent. He has in fact been satisfied by the same values that his

city has held dear. To disobey his society in its decision against himself

would be to renounce what his city has accomplished both for himself and its

other residents. Socrates needs and must hold his head up with pride in knowing

that he was not hypocritical in his decision. The agreement that he made

within his city to obey the laws to live as a good citizen makes the thought of

exile shameful and therefore unacceptable. ANot being sentenced to death, and

fleeing , Awill also strengthen the conviction of the jury that they passed the

right sentence on you, for anyone who destroys the laws could easily be thought

to corrupt the young and the ignorant.@ 64)

Upon establishing the basic concept of right and wrong at the introduction to

the piece Socrates has created an argument that he can not consider to be

unjust. Running away from the decision that his own society has made would be

an affirmation of his own guilt in the of his family and peers. Even though he

may have been wrongly imprisoned and sentenced to death, he holds very little

value in the belief that two wrongs can achieve a justifiable pardon in society

He has firmly stood before his own value system and society’s beliefs, and has

presented his own opinions on how he believes has been right in his actions,

These affirmations of his own conviction to a law abiding community have led

him to an unshaking belief that to ruin all of the work that he has

accomplished. He would consequently made himself a traitor and guilty in all

prolonging eyes.

Socrates has very carefully and thoughtfully consented to what his own city has

deemed to be righteous and justified. His thoughts on his destiny are

completely unselfish, as his only wish is to preserve the society around him

which has accepted him and his family for so many years. He has indignantly

renounced the idea of self preservation and any attempt to escape because of the

potential harm and damage that it ultimately will cause. The disgrace of

thought as he being guilty would force all that he has forged to hide in exile

from the wrath of the society which he has protected.

Socrates has succeeded in justifying his actions by showing how devastating his

disobedience could possibly be. In considering all of the points that he has

made in the defense of his decision. Socrates can maintain his own pride, and

sense of right and wrong. He has shown others, such as Crito . There is a

certain satisfaction in maintaining ones own innocence while not accepting a

hollow victory for one may possibly last for many society’s yet to come.

By maintaining a harmony between what is right and the expression of a persons

own opinions he has made possible the ultimate truth, the belief in what has

worked and staying within the boundaries of decent and god fearing society.

The laws of the society in which Socrates lived condemned him to die for his

own conviction and the reasons for Socrates to remain and accept the

punishments of that society have proved to be wise and justified.

39d