Реферат

Реферат на тему Stalin Did His Rule Benefit Russian Society

Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-05

Поможем написать учебную работу

Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.

Предоплата всего

от 25%

Подписываем

договор

Выберите тип работы:

Скидка 25% при заказе до 26.12.2024


Stalin: Did His Rule Benefit Russian Society And The Russian People? Essay, Research Paper

Stalin: Did his Rule Benefit Russian Society and the Russian People?

I. Introduction

A. Thesis

B. Statement of problem

II. Beginnings

A. Childhood

B. The Making of a Revolutionary

III. The Five Year Plans in Industry

A. Progress and Benefits to Russia

B. Downfalls for the People

IV. Agricultural Changes

A. Collectivization

B. The Liquidation of the Kulaks

C. Famine

V. Social Changes

A. Social Benefits

B. Personal Advancements

C. Woman in Society

VI. Purges

A. The Party

B. The Army

C. The Burial Pits

VII. Conclusion

A. Summary

B. Final Statement

In this paper I plan to prove that even though Stalin made improvements

in the Russian industrial system, his rule did not benefit Russian society and

the Russian people. In order to accomplish this, several questions must be asked.

How did Stalin affect Russia’s industrial power? How did Stalin try to change

Russia’s agricultural system? What changes did Stalin make in society? What were

Stalin’s purges, and who did they effect?

Joseph Vissarionovich Djugashvili was born on December 21, 1879, on the

southern slopes of the Caucasus mountains, in the town of Gori. His mother,

Ekaterina was the daughter of a peasant who married at fifteen and who lost her

first three children at birth. Vissarion, his father, was a self-employed

shoemaker who had a violent temper (Marrin 6-7).

Young Djugashvili was small and wiry and had a deeply pitted face from a

small pox attack that nearly killed him. He also had blood poisoning in his left

arm that was probably caused by Vissarion’s beating fists. The arm would stiffen

at the elbow joint and wither, making it lame and useless for the rest of his

life (Lewis 8; Marrin 8).

He was dedicated to only one person, his mother, and her only ambition

was for her son to become a priest and to bless her with his own hands. But,

this dream was crushed when Joseph was expelled from Tiflis Theological Seminary

for reading “forbidden books” such as Marx and Lenin (Lewis 8; Marrin 20).

After his expulsion from Tiflis school, Joseph became a revolutionary.

He organized strikes and demonstrations at factories and also found ways to

gather money for Lenin and the Bolshevik party. He was banished to Siberia six

times between the years 1903 and 1917. Each time, he escaped easily, except the

last, when he was released because of the February revolution (Lewis 19; Marrin

24). After the death of his first wife, Ekaterina Svanidze, Joseph became more

cold and tough. He gave the child that his wife bore him to her parents and even

chose a new name for himself, Stalin, the Man of Steel (Marrin 26).

Then came the October Revolution and the rise of Lenin and the

Bolsheviks. Stalin became general secretary of the Bolshevik party’s Central

Committee. He was also the commissar of the Workers’ and Peasants’ Inspectorate

and the commissar of nationalities (McKay 927; Treadgold 205). After Lenin’s,

death Stalin gained power by allying himself with the moderates to fight off his

rival, Leon Trotsky, who was a radical and another member of the Central

Committee. Stalin expelled Trotsky and suppressed his radical followers. Then he

turned against his own allies, the moderates. Stalin at last had gained complete

control (McKay 927-928).

One of the great achievements that Stalin made for the Soviet Union were

the Five Year Plans in industry. Russia had not yet had their industrial

revolution and were far behind the other powers of the world. Even Stalin said,”

We are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make good

this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or we shall be crushed.” So, that

is what Stalin set out to do (Dmytryshyn 158).

The First Five Year Plan was adopted in April 1929 by the Sixteenth

Party Conference. It’s purpose was to increase Russia’s industrial production.

On December 31, 1932, the First Five Year Plan was declared officially completed

ahead of schedule. Total industrial output increased two hundred and fifty

percent, steel production increased three hundred percent, production of large-

scale industry showed an increase of one hundred and eighteen percent,

production of machinery and electrical equipment increased one hundred and

fifty-seven percent, heavy metal increased sixty-seven percent, coal output

increased eighty-nine percent, and consumer goods increased about seventy-three

percent (Dmytryshyn 158; McKay 928; Treadgold 266).

After the success of the First Five Year Plan, the Seventeenth Party

Congress formally adopted the Second Five Year Plan, covering the years 1933-

1937 in January, 1934. To overcome the lacking of iron and steel, the Second

Plan ordered construction of forty-five new blast furnaces, one hundred and

sixty-four open-hearth furnaces, and one hundred and seven rolling mills. Other

goals of the second plan were an expansion of machine tool production, the

development and production of non-ferrous metals, and the improvement and

double-tracking of the main railroad lines (Dmytryshyn 159).

The results of the Second Five Year Plan were that some items reached

their estimated targets while others lagged behind. Overall, by the end of the

Second Five Year Plan, the Soviet Union was emerging as a strong industrial

country. It possessed increased capability to produce iron, steel, coal, and

electric power. It also had a whole new range of new industries, including

aviation, tractor, locomotive, chemical, aluminum, nickel, and tin. The Soviet

Union now had a well-established industrial base capable of further expansion

and growth (Dmytryshyn 160-161).

Although rapid industrialization helped improve Russia, it hurt the

workers. “Industrialization moved so fast and was often so poorly planned that

disasters frequently resulted . . .” (Marrin 102). The amount of work that had

to be put in was also hard on the workers. The workers had to work longer under

Stalin than when they were ruled by the tsars. “Depending on the industry, they

worked between forty-eight and sixty hours a week, Sundays included . . .”

(Marrin 103).

Once the industrial Five Year Plans started to roll, Stalin decided to

make some agricultural changes to support the industrialization. In April, 1928,

Stalin presented the draft of a new land law. Although the draft failed to

become a law, it showed a couple of Stalin’s objectives. One was the rapid and

forcible collectivization of the peasants in order to industrialize the country

quickly. The other was the liquidation of the kulaks as a class. Kulaks were

classified as, “Those peasants who were either industrious, or more prosperous

than their neighbors, or simply those who were not enthusiastic about the

policies of the communist party . . .” (Dmytryshyn 167).

Collectivization was the forcible consolidation of individual peasant

farms into large, state-controlled enterprises. It was suppose to help Russian

agriculture and support the quickly industrializing country (McKay 928;

Dmytryshyn 167). Soviet writer, Lyudmila Saraskina believed that,

“Collectivization was a bloody, terrible, and monstrous means of the seizure of

absolute power, because the free peasant and master of the land, the farmer,

constituted one of the main obstacles on the path to the absolute feudal power

that Stalin really wanted . . .” (Lewis 65).

The kulaks were the well off peasants that opposed collectivization any

way they could. The way Stalin dealt with them was to first turn the bedniaks or

poor peasants against them offering the bedniaks the kulaks castles and

machinery. Then, Stalin had the rest of the kulaks either killed or exiled to

the northern or eastern regions of the country. The death toll recorded in the

anti-kulak campaign is between three and ten million killed (Treadgold 268;

Dmytryshyn 168; Lewis 63).

Many peasants killed their cattle, pigs, and horses; destroyed the farm

implements; and either burned their crops or let them rot in the fields before

being forced into collectivization. Because of this, poor harvests, grain

seizures, and the elimination of the better farmers, the kulaks, there was a man

made famine (Lewis 65) . The famine was so bad that some people resorted to

cannibalism. Mykola Pishy reported this about her neighbor, “Ivan was a good

specialist – a joiner, a tailor, a shoe-maker – a good fellow who could turn his

hand at anything. But the famine was awful and he got to the end of his tether.

He was so hungry that he killed his child, and ate the meat . . .” (Lewis 66-67).

In Targan, the city where Alisa Maslo lived, 362 people died from the famine.

They went from house to house and they took away everything to the last

grain . . . and this included ours. And they really left the family to certain

famine death. And so my grandma died and then one of my brothers. . . . My

mother was lying in bed swollen with hunger . . . my older brother had died. And

I told my mother that ‘we’re the only two left’, that my brother was also dead.

Up came the cart and the man took my brother and dragged him to the cart, and

then my own live mother. I started crying and the man said, ‘Go to the orphanage

where at least you’ll get some soup. She’ll die anyway, why should I come here a

second time?’ And so I became an orphan (Lewis 65-66).

Between five and ten million people died from starvation because of the

famine (Dmytryshyn 169).

Along with the improvements in industry and the attempted improvements

in agriculture, Stalin started to make improvements in society. Soviet workers

received some important social benefits, such as old-age pensions, free medical

services, free education, and free day-care centers for children. There was also

the possibility of personal advancement.

To improve your position, you needed specialized skills or technical

education. Massive numbers of trained experts were needed for the rapid

industrialization going on. High salaries and many special privileges were

offered to the technical and managerial elite. Millions struggled in

universities, institutes, and night schools for the all important specialized

education. “In Soviet Russia there is no capital except education. If a person

does not want to become a collective farmer or just a cleaning woman, the only

means you have to get something is through education . . .” (McKay 931-932).

Another change under Stalin was that there was an equality of rights for

women. They were urged to work outside the home and to liberate themselves

sexually. Divorces and abortions were also made very easy. “Young women were

constantly told that they should be fully equal to men, that they could and

should do anything men could do . . .” (McKay 932). Most women had to work

outside the home because it took both the husband and wife working to support

their family. But, the woman had a heavy burden of household chores in her off

hours. Soviet men still considered the home and the children the wife’s

responsibilities (McKay 933).

Along with some of these beneficial changes that Stalin made to society

came some non-beneficial ones, specifically the purges. One of the first to be

eliminated was Stalin’s wife, Nadezhda Alliluyeva, who after being ridiculed by

her husband at a party for the fifteenth anniversary of the revolution on

November 8, 1932, apparently shot herself (Lewis 83-84; McKay 930). Then, at

four o’clock in the afternoon of December 1, 1934, a young disillusioned

Communist named Leonid V. Nikolaev shot Stalin’s number-two man, Sergei Kirov,

who had just been offered Stalin’s job of General Secretary from the senior

members of the Party (Marrin 116; Lewis 86; McKay 930; Treadgold 278).

Stalin used Kirov’s death to launch a reign of terror. Stalin blamed

Kirov’s death on foreign powers, the exiled Trotsky, and the moderates. Stalin

ordered the “purification” of the party. On August 19, 1936, sixteen old

Bolsheviks were publicly tried for conspiring with Trotsky and for the murder of

Kirov (Dmytryshyn 179-181; Treadgold 279). Anyone connected anyway to Nikolayev

was also arrested. Robert Conquest explains:

Everyone who was remotely connected with the case was seized. One woman

had worked as a librarian at the ‘Young Communist Club’ in Leningrad which had

been disbanded in the mid-twenties but, with which Nikolayev had in some way

been associated. Not only was she arrested, but also her sister with whom she

lived, her sister’s husband, the secretary of her Party cell, and all those who

had recommended her for jobs (Lewis 90).

Then in January 1937 there was another trial for seventeen more party

members. They were accused of conspiring with Nazi Germany and Japan to

dismember the USSR (Dmytryshyn 181).

The trials and arrests continued. There were mass arrests, confessions

extracted by force, and the executions and deportations of thousands of peasants.

Soviet officers were also arrested and convicted. The Red Army lost three of

it’s five field marshals, fourteen of it’s sixteen army commanders, sixty of

it’s sixty-seven corps commanders, 136 of it’s 199 division commanders, 220

brigade commanders, all eleven deputy commissars of war, seventy-five members of

the Supreme Military Council, all military district commanders, all air force

officers, all except one navy fleet commander, and all eight Red Navy admirals.

In addition, the army lost half of it’s officer corps, 35,000 men ranging from

colonels to company commanders (Dmytryshyn 180-182; Marrin 127).

Many that suffered from the purges were sent to labor camps or were just

executed by the secret police. Local units of secret police were even ordered to

arrest a certain percentage of the people in their districts (McKay 931). Graves

were discovered in 1934 holding over 9,000 bodies of people killed around 1938

in the Ukraine. Since then mass burial sights have been discovered outside major

cities such as Minsk, Kiev, and Novosibirsk, and one with possibly 40,000 bodies

in the Kirov region of Donetsk. A burial sight at Chelyabinsk, was found to

contain more than 80,000 people. Zenon Pozniak, an archaeologist who has

excavated many of these burial plots also found 510 burial pits in Kuropaty and

calculated that each one contained about 150 bodies. That could mean there are

around 75,000 bodies in there. Apparently there were as many as 1,000 pits

originally (Lewis 106-107). Pozniak has also researched the circumstances of

these people’s deaths:

They were shot by NKVD (secret police) soldiers in NKVD uniform. They

shot them from behind, in the back and pushed them into the pit. When that group

was finished, they covered the corpses with sand like a layer cake. They got the

contents of the next lorry and shot them, and in that way they filled the pit

right up to the top . . . people who lived in the villages nearby told us that .

. . the earth would breathe. Some people weren’t actually dead when they were

buried, and the earth breathed and heaved and the blood came through (Lewis 107).

Stalin used the Five Year Plans to make great strides in industrializing

Russia. When he tried to equal that success with agricultural growth he met some

resistance and ended up liquidating a class and causing famine. Socially, he

gave some important social benefits to workers and gave women equal rights. But,

he also tried to purge the country and eliminated a lot of the Party, most of

the army, and a good part of the workers and peasants. Stalin made several

industrial improvements for his country but, that does not even begin to equal

the death and destruction that he caused.

Works Cited

Dmytryshyn, Basil. USSR: A Concise History. 2nd ed. New York: Scribner’s, 1971.

Lewis, Jonathan, and Phillip Whitehead. Stalin. New York: Pantheon Books, 1990.

Marrin, Albert. Stalin: Russia’s Man of Steel. New York: Viking Kestrel, 1988.

McKay, John P, Bennett D. Hill, and John Buckler. History of Western Society.

4th ed. Boston: Houghton, 1991.

Treadgold, Donald W. Twentieth Century Russia. 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand, 1964.

38e


1. Реферат на тему Amory Blaine
2. Реферат на тему Oil Spills Essay Research Paper Oil Spills
3. Реферат Индивидуальный и общественный нарциссизм
4. Реферат на тему Baby Boomers Essay Research Paper Our children
5. Реферат Физическая культура в детских дошкольных учреждениях
6. Реферат на тему Epic Of Gilgamesh Essay Research Paper Lindsey
7. Реферат Организация перевозок и управление на транспорте автомобильном
8. Реферат на тему Dietary Food Supplements Essay Research Paper There
9. Сочинение на тему Ломоносов м. в. - кто знает коль велик творец...
10. Изложение Умберто Эко. Маятник Фуко