Hamlet Tragedy Essay, Research Paper

Hamlet (c. 1600) is perhaps the most famous of all the tragedies created by

William Shakespeare. The main character ? Hamlet — may be the most complex

and controversial character any playwright has ever placed onstage. Hamlet?s

erratic behavior poses a question: is he being rational in his acts and

sacrificing himself for the ?greater good? or is he simply mad? How and why

does Hamlet move from one state of mind to the other? What significance does

this have for the play? Throughout the play Hamlet goes through several

different stages of life, constantly being in a tortured mental state, caught

between love, grief, and vengeance. His different states of mind are the result

of his controversial personality and his ability to objectively analyze any

situation. Over the centuries there have been a multitude of different

explanations for Hamlet’s behavior. One of the views is that Hamlet is simply a

victim of circumstances; the other presents him as a beautiful but ineffectual

soul who lacked the willpower to avenge his father. Hamlet can also be viewed as

something close to a manic-depressive whose melancholy moods, as his failure to

take revenge continues, deepened into self-contempt. His disturbing gift of

laughing at his own grief as well as at the shortcomings of the world in general

also contributes to the complexity of his character. His laughter strengthens

the plot, by becoming one of the qualities of his mind that enable him to avoid

his mission and postpone his revenge. The reader can see that Shakespeare meant

to create Hamlet to be such a complicated character. Hamlet is a person of

exceptional intelligence and sensitivity, raised to occupy a high station in

life and then suddenly confronted with a violent and terrifying situation in

which he must take drastic action. He admits that he is not ready for this task:

?The time is out of joint. O cursed spite, / That ever I was born to set it

right!? (1.5.188-89). At this point Hamlet?s mind is torn apart by the

controversy of vengeance. It’s hardly surprising to find him veering between

extremes of behavior, hesitating, demanding proof, and looking for the most

appropriate way to carry out his task. The Ghost appears before Hamlet at a very

disturbing time in his life — his father?s tragic death and his mother?s

quick remarriage are more than Hamlet?s mind can bear. The reader can easily

find justification for this point of view, especially in Hamlet’s own

soliloquies. Early in the play Hamlet manifests his anger: Let me not think

on?t; frailty, thy name is woman? A little month, or ere those shoes were

old With which she followed my poor father?s body Like Niobe, all tears, why,

she? O god, a beast that wants discourse of reason Would have mourned

longer?married with my uncle, My father?s brother, but no more like my

father Than I to Hercules. Within a month, Ere yet the salt of most unrighteous

tears Had left the flushing in her galled eyes, She married. O, most wicked

speed, to post With such dexterity to incestuous sheets! It is not, nor it

cannot come to good. (1.2.146-58) Linked to the theme of revenge is the great

question of Hamlet’s inner meditations: Is there a point to life at all? Do

humans suffer in this harsh world for a purpose, or simply because they are

afraid to find out what may lie beyond it? Is there a higher power, and how does

one seek its guidance? Hamlet’s anguish is caused by his effort to link even the

most trivial event to the order of the universe. His inability to coop with

reality because of his philosophical beliefs causes Hamlet?s state of mind to

constantly change. His dilemma is in his unsuccessful attempts to create a

tangible bond between his passion, which would spur him to immediate vengeance,

and reason, which is God-given, and which would soothe Hamlet?s action with

sensible judgment. Hamlet is trapped between two worlds: the ideal world that he

created in his head and the existing reality. Worst of all however, is that he

realizes that the weakness of his mind prevents him from acting: ?Why, then

?tis none to you, for there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes

it so? (2.2. 253-54). Another point worth mentioning is the effect that the

concept of revenge has on Hamlet. This powerful demand is countered in Hamlet’s

mind by three questions: Is revenge a good or an evil act? Is Claudius truly

guilty and so to be punished? Is it Hamlet’s responsibility to punish him? The

fact that Hamlet is a thinking as well as a feeling person, conscious of the

good and bad points in every step he takes, makes the act of revenge

particularly painful for him. Revenge is not Christian, and Hamlet is a

Christian prince; it is not rational, and Hamlet is a philosopher; it is not

gentle, and Hamlet is a gentleman. Hamlet does not approach his task in an

unquestioning, mechanical way. He has doubts about it, as any of us might if

asked to do the same thing. It releases violent emotions in him, the intensity

of which shocks and unbalances him. Both Marcellus and Horatio fear that the

Ghost may be an evil spirit intending to damn or destroy Hamlet. Hamlet himself

seems to toy with this idea at times; however, he accepts the ghost’s story, at

first cautiously and then unquestioningly after the Play Scene: I know my

course. The spirit that I have seen May be a devil, and the devil hath power

T? assume a pleasing shape, yea, and perhaps Out of my weakness and my

melancholy, As he is very potent with such spirits, Abuses me to damn me. I?ll

have grounds More relative than this. (2.2. 610-16) Yet again Hamlet is reminded

of his own conflicting impulses and of his inability to feel sufficient desire

for revenge or sufficient grief over his father’s death. Although Hamlet?s

mind is still possessed by doubts, he suppresses them and makes a first definite

decision to act. It becomes clear that Hamlet constantly battles the fear that

the idea of revenge is inspired by his own deranged mind, and therefore by

carrying it out he would be committing a sin. By the end of the play however,

there is no question that the ghost was speaking the truth. Whether its advice

was good and heaven-sent, however, is unclear, considering the death and

destruction to which its desire for revenge has led. It is also important to

point out yet another controversy of Hamlet?s character — the cruel and

barbaric aspects of his behavior– his mental badgering of Ophelia, his reason

for refusing to kill Claudius at prayer, and most of all the coldhearted and

possibly unjust way he has dealt with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. All those

scenes suggest that Hamlet is himself a crude and unpleasant character, and his

poetic speeches merely sugarcoat the bitter pill. On the other hand, the

emotional violence of his scene with Ophelia is often explained by suggesting

that Hamlet knows their meeting is being watched by the King and Polonius. The

murder of Polonius, though perhaps an excessive punishment for his

eavesdropping, is the inevitable outgrowth of his spying on behalf of the King.

However, Hamlet does not think that murdering Polonius is enough of a punishment

? he also hides his body. When the King questions Hamlet about the whereabouts

of Polonius?s body, Hamlet replies: ?In heaven. Send thither to see. If your

messenger find him not there, seek him I? th? other place yourself. But if

indeed you find him not within this month, you shall nose as you go up the

stairs into the lobby? (4.3. 33-7). Naturally Hamlet realizes that by denying

Polonius the proper Christian burial, he denies him the possibility of going to

heaven. Remembering Hamlet?s deliberations about revenge and his fear that the

Ghost was sent by the devil, the reader might wonder ? what is happening to

Hamlet? Hamlet?s state of mind changes yet again ? he becomes ruthless. At

that point it is clear that Hamlet is ready to kill Claudius, since he does not

hesitate even for a moment when he kills Polonius. His sacrilegious playing with

Polonius? corpse serves as evidence that he accepted himself as the true

avenger of his fathers? death. Similarly, Hamlet’s execution of Rosencrantz

and Guildenstern is warranted by their willingness to serve Claudius. Hamlet

justifies his actions, saying essentially that his friends got caught in the

middle, between him and Claudius; that their ?own insinuation? (5.2. 59) has

brought about their defeat. In the end of the play Hamlet says: ?There is

special providence in fall of a sparrow. If it be now, ?tis not to come; if it

be not to come, it will be now; if it be not now, yet it will come. The

readiness is all. Since no man of aught he leaves knows, what is?t to leave

betimes? Let be? (5.2. 220-5). Hamlet expresses his belief in fate ?

whatever is meant to be will come sooner or later. Perhaps he feels that he is

destined to die, or he might feel confident enough to win. With the full

acceptance of the idea of revenge came the acceptance of fate. Hamlet?s

philosophical nature wins. Hamlet?s different states of mind are essential to

the play. Through those changes Shakespeare shows the reader the birth, growth

and demise of Hamlet?s character. From the beginning Hamlet faces several

questions — he must decide whether to avenge his father or not, and if so, how.

Those are not easy questions. By showing Hamlet?s uncertainty and inability to

make a decision throughout the play Shakespeare makes him so human that the

reader starts to wonder whether Hamlet did actually exist. Also Shakespeare

shows the reader that for a man with Hamlet’s ideals the world is out of joint

with itself, in which he can only hope for perfection, but never achieve it.