Hamlet In Detail Essay, Research Paper

In both Hamlet and King Lear, Shakespeare incorporates a theme of madness with

two characters: one truly mad, and one only acting mad to serve a motive. The

madness of Hamlet is frequently disputed. This paper argues that the

contrapuntal character in each play, namely Ophelia in Hamlet and Edgar in King

Lear, acts as a balancing argument to the other character?s madness or sanity.

King Lear?s more decisive distinction between Lear?s frailty of mind and

Edgar?s contrived madness works to better define the relationship between

Ophelia?s breakdown and Hamlet?s "north-north-west" brand of

insanity. Both plays offer a character on each side of sanity, but in Hamlet the

distinction is not as clear as it is in King Lear. Using the more explicit

relationship in King Lear, one finds a better understanding of the relationship

in Hamlet. While Shakespeare does not directly pit Ophelia?s insanity (or

breakdown) against Hamlet?s madness, there is instead a clear definitiveness

in Ophelia?s condition and a clear uncertainty in Hamlet?s madness.

Obviously, Hamlet?s character offers more evidence, while Ophelia?s

breakdown is quick, but more conclusive in its precision. Shakespeare offers

clear evidence pointing to Hamlet?s sanity beginning with the first scene of

the play. Hamlet begins with guards whose main importance in the play is to give

credibility to the ghost. If Hamlet were to see his father?s ghost in private,

the argument for his madness would greatly improve. Yet, not one, but three men

together witness the ghost before even thinking to notify Hamlet. As Horatio

says, being the only of the guards to play a significant role in the rest of the

play, "Before my God, I might not this believe / Without the sensible and

true avouch / Of mine own eyes. (I.i.56-8)" Horatio, who appears frequently

throughout the play, acts as an unquestionably sane alibi to Hamlet again when

framing the King with his reaction to the play. That Hamlet speaks to the ghost

alone detracts somewhat from its credibility, but all the men are witness to the

ghost demanding they speak alone. Horatio offers an insightful warning: What if

it tempts you toward the flood, my lord, Or to the dreadful summit of the cliff

That beetles o?er his base into the sea, And there assume some other horrible

form Which might deprive your sovereignty of reason, And draw you into madness?

Think of it. (I.iv.69-74) Horatio?s comment may be where Hamlet gets the idea

to use a plea of insanity to work out his plan. The important fact is that the

ghost does not change form, but rather remains as the King and speaks to Hamlet

rationally. There is also good reason for the ghost not to want the guards to

know what he tells Hamlet, as the play could not proceed as it does if the

guards were to hear what Hamlet did. It is the ghost of Hamlet?s father who

tells him, "but howsomever thou pursues this act, / Taint not thy mind.

(I.v.84-5)" Later, when Hamlet sees the ghost again in his mothers room,

her amazement at his madness is quite convincing. Yet one must take into

consideration the careful planning of the ghost?s credibility earlier in the

play. After his first meeting with the ghost, Hamlet greets his friends

cheerfully and acts as if the news is good rather than the devastation it really

is. Horatio: What news, my lord? Hamlet: O, wonderful! Horatio: Good my lord,

tell it. Hamlet: No, you will reveal it. (I.v.118-21) This is the first glimpse

of Hamlet?s ability and inclination to manipulate his behavior to achieve

effect. Clearly Hamlet is not feeling cheerful at this moment, but if he lets

the guards know the severity of the news, they might suspect its nature. Another

instance of Hamlet?s behavior manipulation is his meeting with Ophelia while

his uncle and Polonius are hiding behind a curtain. Hamlet?s affection for

Ophelia has already been established in I.iii., and his complete rejection of

her and what has transpired between them is clearly a hoax. Hamlet somehow

suspects the eavesdroppers, just as he guesses that Guildenstern and Rosencrantz

are sent by the King and Queen to question him and investigate the cause of his

supposed madness in II.ii. Hamlet?s actions in the play after meeting the

ghost lead everyone except Horatio to believe he is crazy, yet that madness is

continuously checked by an ever-present consciousness of action which never lets

him lose control. For example, Hamlet questions his conduct in his soliloquy at

the end of II.ii, but after careful consideration decides to go with his

instinct and prove to himself without a doubt the King?s guilt before

proceeding rashly. Even after the King?s guilt is proven with Horatio as

witness, Hamlet again reflects and uses his better judgement in the soliloquy at

the end of III.ii. before seeing his mother. He recognizes his passionate

feelings, but tells himself to "speak daggers to her, but use none,"

as his father?s ghost instructed. Again, when in the King?s chamber, Hamlet

could perform the murder, but decides not to in his better judgement to ensure

that he doesn?t go to heaven by dying while praying. As Hamlet tells

Guildenstern in II.ii., "I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is

southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw." This statement reveals out-right

Hamlet?s intent to fool people with his odd behavior. This is after Polonius?

enlightened comment earlier in the same scene, "though this be madness, yet

there is method in?t." Compare the copious evidence against Hamlet?s

madness with the complete lack of evidence for Ophelia?s sanity after her

father?s murder. Her unquestionable insanity puts Hamlet?s very questionable

madness in a more favorable light. In IV.v. she is quite obviously mad, and

unlike Hamlet there seems to be no method to her madness. All Ophelia can do

after learning of her father?s death is sing. Indeed, Hamlet?s utter

rejection of her combined with this is too much for her, and she doesn?t sing

a mourning song at the beginning of IV.v, but rather a happy love song. Later,

when she meets with Leartes, she says to him: There?s rosemary, that?s for

remembrance; pray you, love, remember. And there is pansies, that?s for

thoughts. Leartes: A document in madness, thoughts and remembrance fitted.

Thought and afflictions, passion, hell itself, She turns to favor and to

prettiness. (IV.v.179-89) While the Queen tells Leartes that an "envious

sliver" broke and flung Ophelia into the river wearing a headdress of

wild-flowers (compare the mad Lear?s crown of weeds), the clowns in V.i.

confirm the reader?s suspicion that she did not die so accidentally: Is she to

be buried in Christian burial when she willfully seeks her own salvation?

(V.i.1-2) Here lies the water; good. Here stands the man; good. If the man go to

this water and drown himself, it is, will he, nill he, he goes, mark you that.

But if the water come to him and drown him, he drowns not himself; argal, he

that is not guilty of his own death shortens not his own life. (15-20)

Ophelia?s breakdown into madness and inability to deal with her father?s

death and Hamlet?s rejection is dealt with neatly and punctually. There is

little evidence against her madness, compared to Hamlet?s intelligent plotting

and use of witnesses to his actions. Thus, by defining true madness in Ophelia,

Shakespeare subtracts from the plausibility of Hamlet?s supposed insanity.

Comparing the juxtaposition of insanity and questioned sanity in King Lear

reveals another use of this device by Shakespeare. In King Lear the lines are

drawn more distinctly between sanity and insanity, allowing a sharper contrast

between the play?s two versions of madness. Edgar?s soliloquy in II.iii.

communicates his intent to act and dress as a mad beggar: … Whiles I may scape

I will preserve myself, and am bethought To take the basest and most poorest

shape That ever penury, in contempt of man, Brought near to beast. My face

I?ll grime with filth, Blanket my loins, elf all my hairs in knots, And with

presented nakedness outface The winds and persecutions of the sky. (II.iii.5-12)

There is no question of Edgar?s intent here, and when they see this ?Bedlam

beggar? in action, the audience is aware that it is Edgar and that he is not

really insane. As in Hamlet, the contrived madness is more spectacular than the

true madness. Edgar changes his voice, tears his clothes, and babbles on like a

genuine lunatic seeming in contrivance more genuine than Lear, the genuine

maniac. Just as Ophelia?s breakdown is believable because of her father?s

death and her rejection from Hamlet, Lear?s old age accounts for his frailty

of mind and rash, foolish decisions. The reader is given no motive for Lear to

tear his clothes off like a raving maniac or wear a crown of weeds and babble

like a fool other than his old age and incapability to deal with his inability

to act rationally. He realizes after being told for most of the play that he is

being a fool that perhaps his advisors are right. Only at this point, it has

long been clear to the reader that his madness is due to senility. In these two

plays, Shakespeare uses the dimmer light of reality to expose the brighter light

of contrivance. Hamlet and Edgar are dynamic, animated, and absurd in their

madness, making Lear?s and Ophelia?s true madness seem realistic rather than

absurd. Hamlet and Edgar both explicitly state the contrivance of their madness,

while Lear and Ophelia do not. Further, Hamlet and Edgar both have motive behind

leading others to believe they are insane. Although both are under severe

pressure and emotional strain due to their respective situations in each play,

they both show a remarkable amount of intelligent, conscious, and rational

decision-making in efforts to resolve their situations. In this way, they are

sharply contrasted with the mad Lear and Ophelia, whose insanity is not

questioned by themselves or other characters in either play. Neither after

displaying madness make any rational decisions that would lead the reader to

believe in their sanity. Thus, the argument that Hamlet is truly mad refutes his

ability to act rationally and discounts the dramatic device of Ophelia (as Lear

is to Edgar) as a contrapuntal example of true insanity. Hamlet one of

Shakespeare’s greatest plays, where the young prince of Denmark must uncover the

truth about his fathers death. Hamlet a play that tells the story of a young

prince who’s father recently died. Hamlets uncle Claudius marries his mother the

queen and takes the throne. As the play is told Hamlet finds out his father was

murdered by the recently crowned king. The theme that remains constant

throughout the play is appearance versus reality. Things within the play appear

to be true and honest but in reality are infested with evil. Many of the

characters within the play hide behind a mask of falseness. Four of the main

characters that hid behind this mask are Polonius, Rosencrantz (Guildenstern),

the king Cluadius. From behind this mask they give the impression of a person

who is sincere and genuine, in reality they are plagued with lies and evil.

There appearance will make it very difficult for Hamlet to uncover the truth,

the characters hide behind. Polonius the kings royal assistant has a

preoccupation with appearance. He always wants to keep up the appearance of

loving and caring person. Polonius appears like a man who loves and cares about

his son, Laertes. Polonius speaks to his son with advice that sounds sincere but

in reality it is rehearsed, hollow and without feeling. Polonius gives his

advice only to appear to be the loving caring father. The reality is he only

speaks to appear sincere as a politician, to look good rather then actually be

good: "And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry. This above all: to thine

own self be true, And it must follow, as the night the day, Thou canst not then

be false to any man. Farewell; my blessing season this in thee!" Act 1

Polonius gives his son Laertes his blessing to go away, he sends a spy to follow

him and keep an eye on him. This shows his lack of trust for anyone, he gives

the appearance of a confident father who trusts his son to go off on his own. In

reality he lies about his trust for his son by sending a spy to watch him. His

advice he gives his son is rehearsed and only said to give the appearance of a

loving father. Polonius further adds to the theme appearance verses reality by

ordering Ophelia to stop seeing Hamlet. He lies to her telling her that Hamlet

does not love her, he only lusts for her, in truth he does love her: Ay,

springes to catch woodcocks. I do know, When the blood burns , how prodigal the

soul Through the play Polonius hids behind his mask appearing to be honest

loving parent. In reality Polonius lies, manipulates people and eavesdrops on

peoples conversation. Polonius helps contribute to the theme appearance verses

reality by showing how his appearance is not his true nature, behind the mask

there lies someone totally different. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are two of

Hamlets childhood friends who when asked by the king, try to find out what is

troubling the young prince. Both help to contribute to the theme by showing

there appearance of being Hamlets friends. The pair go to Hamlet pretending to

be his friends when in truth they are only there because the king asked them to

find the truth. There is some irony within the twins, they are asked by the king

to find out the truth by hiding within a lie, by pretending to be his friend: A

dream is but a shadow Act II. Hamlet knows there purpose for their visit is to

dig into his soul to find the real reason for his actions as of late. As the

play continues the twins are asked again by the king to go to Hamlet and try

again to find the real reason for Hamlets behavior. Hamlet insults them at every

chance knowing they are lying to him about there purpose of the visit: Tis as

easy as lying; govern these ventages with you finger and thumb, give it breath

with your mouth…Act III As the melodrama continues Hamlet goes with the twins

to reclaim money that another state owes Denmark. Hamlet is sent by the king to

retrieve the assets. In actuality Hamlet is sent off to wither because the king,

Claudius knows that Hamlet knows too much and must be killed. The twins show

there appearance of being Hamlets friends but in truth they have a hidden reason

for visiting with Hamlet. Both show that it will be very difficult for Hamlet to

uncover the fidelity hidden within the lies. Claudius the king of Denmark

conduct in council gives him the appearance of an Honest and honorable man. In

Act one scene two Claudius in the presence of council shows his true skill and

ease of manner at speaking. Claudius speaks well of the spent king by showing a

general love for him by all his subjects. Claudius show respect for the old

sovereign by speaking kind words of him. In reality he cares little for the old

king, he speaks kindly only to give the appearance of loving brother. Though yet

of Hamlet our dear brother’s death The memory be green, and that it us befitted

To bear our hearts in grief, and our whole kingdom To be contracted in one brow

of woe Act I As Claudius sends Voltimand and Cornelius off to give the king of

Norway the message of Fortibras, he thanks and gives them complete trust, in the

deliverance of the notation. This shows his trust and caring for his subjects in

front of the council, wining even more consent from the council: We doubt it

nothing: heartily farewell. Act I Claudius increases his appearance of a honest

and honorable man, in front of the council by showing his respect for Polonius.

He gives him the power to let his son Laertes stay or leave for Norway. Claudius

speaks highly of Polonius giving him thanks and saying the he was responsible

for Claudius becoming king: The head is not more native to the heart, The hand

more instrumental to the mouth, Than is the throne of Denmark to thy father.

What woudlst thou have, Laertes (Act I ii, 47-50) This council would see this as

a man who greatly respects his subjects and cares for them. This adds to the

difficulty of uncovering the truth for Hamlet later. Hamlet enters the council

chamber and speaks with Claudius. The king (Claudius) speaks with Hamlet seeming

to be concerned with Hamlet. He gives advice that over grieveing is not healthy,

this shows a concern for Hamlets well being. This conduct of Claudius gives him

the appearance of being kind in front of council that accepts him even more for

his family values: How is it that the clouds still hang on you? Act I Claudius

appears to be even more caring when insulted by Hamlet he still shows love and

general care for Hamlet. A normal king would have become angry and Hamlet would

have gotten into trouble. Claudius shows the council that he is understanding of

Hamlet’s grief over his father: A little more than kin, and less than kind. Act

I . Claudius gives Hamlet advice that over grieveing can be harmful and not

healthy. Claudius tells Hamlet that he is a admirable person for grieveing for

so long over his dads death. Yet again Claudius keeps putting on the appearance

of the honorable man. Tis sweet and commendable in your nature, Hamlet, To give

these mourning duties to your father: But, you must know, you father lost a

father; That father lost, lost his; and the survivor bound In filial obligation

for some term To do obsequious sorrow; but to persever In obstinate condolement

is a course Act I Claudius further makes it difficult to uncover the truth by

announcing that Hamlet is next in line for the throne of Denmark. This shows

that Claudius would let Hamlet become the next king when he is gone. This

reveals a love and care for Hamlet to the council and Gertrude making Claudius

appear to be kind, loving person: You are the most immediate to our throne; And

with no less nobility of love Act I Claudius final conduct that makes him a

difficult truth to uncover, is his care and want that Hamlet remain in Denmark.

Claudius is insulted by Hamlet, he asks Hamlet to stay only that his queen

Gertrude wants Hamlet to stay. Claudius appears to be concerned with Hamlets

well being, Gertrude and council see this ,making Claudius a more deserving

person to be king. As Claudius speaks in council he gives the appearance of

someone who is a deserving person that should be king. Claudius is voted in as

king meaning he is already approved by everyone. Claudius gives respect to his

subjects giving the council the impression that he respects them. The king shows

general concern for Hamlet, his nephew. This will make it very difficult to

prove the truth about Claudius in the future for he has not only, one the love

and respect of council (that voted him in). But also has prevented a attack on

Denmark (from Fortinbras) proving that he is good king that can protect the

state from harm. Claudius makes it very difficult for Hamlet to uncover the

truth about the true nature of Claudius in the future. Through the characters

within the play all help to show the theme, that being appearance verses

reality. Polonius, Rosencrantz (Guildenstern) and the king all appear to be good

and honest. As Hamlet finds out, all contain lies and have hidden intentions

within them. As each character is presented in the play all appear to be good

and honest making it a difficult task for Hamlet to uncover the hidden truth

about the nature of each character. As Hamlet best said it somethings is rotten

in Denmark That being the lies which have replaced or covered the true state of

each character. Madness may be "mental incapacity caused by an

unmentionable injury." Such wounds often are not easily perceived but may

be revealed in time of stress. Hamlet?s question, "have you a

daughter?"(Act II. Sc2 182) Polonius about the Prince?s emotional state.

What is hidden will surely be told to Cloudius by his adviser. Laertes? search

for revenge is sharper proof that madness in degrees of publicity causes harm to

the observers. Claudius promise "no wind of blame"(Act IV, Sc.7,66)

once Laertes kills Hamlet; perhaps this is what the uncle has sought all along

for himself. Ophelia has a unique, very powerful form of madness; she seems

caught as a "baker?s daughter,"(Act IV, Sc. 5, 42) between memories

of her father and Hamlet who ought have spokedn to her of events on

"Valentine?s day."(Act IV, Sc 5, 48) She is doubly hexed and the

madness she has infects the whole court. Once a person?s mental state has been

studied in public, there is no telling the injuries which may affect the

viewers. Ever since the death of King Hamlet young Hamlet has been what appeared

to be in a state of madness. In a discussion between Hamlet and Polonius Hamlet

questions Polonius by asking him "have you a daughter."(Act II, Sc.2,

182) In this discussion Hamlet shows antic behavior towards Polonius by mocking

him when Hamlet would usually show great respect for him because of he age and

heis high position in the court. This sudden question to Polonius has caused

Polonius to believe that Hamlet has a form of love-sickness and that Polonius is

sure to tell Claudius of his condition. Hamlet also accuses Polonius of being

the "Jephthah, judge of Israel,"(Act II,Sc.2, 399) meaning that

Polonius would put his country in front of his daughter. Hamlet has now

convinced Polonius that he is in a state of madness because he knows that

Polonius cares for his daughter very much and would never put her second. By

convincing Polonius that he has no consideration for the well-being of others,

Hamlet is then hoping that Polonius will tell the court of his emotional

madness. Unlike Hamlet, Laertes has developed a different kind of madness, a

madness that is controlled by revenge. When Laertes is talking to Claudius,

Laertes gets so much revenge building up inside him against Hamlet that Laertes

now wants to "cut his throat."(Act 4,Sc.7,125) Laertes? behavior is

caused by the sudden death of his father who was without a due ceremony, and his

sister who has been driven mad, has contributed to the madness that is being

built up inside Laertes. This madness grows even stronger when Claudius promises

"no wind of blame"(Act IV.Sc7,66) when Laertes kills Hamlet. With

Claudius being the puppet holder and Laertes being the puppet, Claudius turns

Laertes into a savage beast to avenge for his fathers’ death; perhaps this is

what the Claudius has planned all along. Laertes has a form of madness that is

escalating because Laertes knows that he has the capabilities and motivation to

act on what he believes on. Ophelia has a unique form of madness unlike

Hamlet?s and Laertes? because it a mixture of love and hate. An example of

hate is when she sings about a "baker’s daughter."(Act IV,Sc.5,42)

Ophelia is referring to the way her father used to treat her before the tragic

incident of his death. A love within her madness is when she speaks about the

events on "Valentine?s day."(Act IV, Sc.5,48) When Ophelia speaks

about Valentines day she is referring to the events of romance that she was

denied. Ophelia?s madness is brought on by her lack of being able to

demonstrate any maturity in trying to cope with her losses and in return can

only inflict her madness on the court. By stating that Hamlet could have

controlled his fraudulent madness, he then had the capability of controlling his

conscious mind into acting traditional. Where Laertes was very influential by

others and had no real control over the mental state he was developing by the

sway of Claudius. Ophelia was the most innocent victim of all because she was

the side affect of everyone else?s actions and had no idea that she was

mentally disintegrating. It can be noticed that within each of these three

people there can be no reassurance on what the affect they may have on others

due to their mental state in public. Hamlet’s Sanity Hamlet appears to be

insane, after Polonius?s death, in act IV scene II. There are indications,

though, that persuade me to think other wise. Certainly, Hamlet has plenty of

reasons to be insane at this point. His day has been hectic?he finally

determined Claudius had killed his father, the chance to kill Claudius

confronted him, he comes very close to convincing Gertrude that Claudius killed

his father, he accidentally kills Polonius, and finally the ghost of his father

visits him. These situations are enough to bring Hamlet to insanity, but he

remains sharp and credible. Hamlet is able to make smart remarks to Rosencrantz

and Guildenstern, comparing then to sponges, "When he (Claudius) needs what

you have gleaned, it is but squeezing you and, sponge, you shall be dry

again," (pg 98, 20). This is random and unexpected, as many of his actions,

but the comparison makes sense; Rosencrantz and Guildenstern soak up all the

kings favors, only to become dry again after they mop up the King?s mess

(spying on Hamlet, and getting Polonius?s body). Later, with Claudius, Hamlet

tells how lowly a king can be by saying, "A man (beggar) may fish with the

worm that hath eat of a king, and eat of the fish that hath fed of that

worm," (pg 99, 29). This also makes sense, and is not quite as random; when

Hamlet confronts Claudius, and the king asks where Polonius is, Hamlet

immediatly begins the comparison by telling Claudius that Polonuis is at supper

(the worms are eating him for supper, and so on). This proves that Hamlet had

some kind of planning for this degrading comment, and that his thoughts are not

scattered and he is able to stay focused. There is a question of what being

insane really is. Since it is agreeable that Ophelia was crazy, it?s possible

to use her as a guide to make this argument valid. Hamlet and Ophelia both

shared the trait of having calculated thoughts, Ophelia?s singing and

Hamlet?s verbal attacks. They also shared calmness before their deaths. But

was Hamlet spraying rude remarks to everyone before he died, as Ophelia had sung

floating down the river? No, in-fact Hamlet was the opposite of what he was

before. If he were crazy, like Ophelia, he would have remained hectic and random

up until the time of (and after) the duel. Hamlet, though, was not?he even

reasoned what death for him was, finishing his question of whether life was

worth living for. Hamlet can truley be seen to be sane, and not. The facts that

Hamlet was smart and swift thinking, and in such a reversal of emotions (from

after Polonius died) in the end, leads strongly to the opinion that Hamlet was

not insane.