Реферат на тему UnH1d Essay Research Paper Never before have
Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-18Поможем написать учебную работу
Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.
Untitled Essay, Research Paper
Never before have I encountered more intriguing works of art than those done
by Andy Warhol. I have been curious about his life ever since I saw his work
in Milwaukee. I saw his famous work of the Campbell’s Soup Can. By viewing
this, one can tell he is not your average artist. I’m sure his life is full
of interesting events that shaped him into who he was. As an artist myself,
I would like to get to know the background of his life. I may then be able
to appreciate his styles and understand why and how his works were created.
His life is as interesting as his artistic masterpieces.
Andrew Warhola (his original name) was born one of three sons of Czech
immigrants, somewhere in Pennsylvania on either August 6, 1928 or on September
28, 1930 (the date on his birth certificate). His father died when Andy was
at a very young age. Thus, it forced Andy into a deep depression containing
lack of self confidence. Much of his young life has been kept secret. However,
he did report being very shy and depressed because he never felt comfortable
with his homosexuality. His childhood life may have been full of the torture
that children threw at him for being the different person he was. He was
able to attend college. After graduating with a Bachelor of Arts degree in
pictorial design from Carnegie Institute of Technology in 1949, he went to
New York City with Philip Pearlstein, who was a fellow student that later
became a well-known realist painter. In 1960, Warhol finally began to paint
in earnest and to view art seriously as a career. He began his career with
commercial drawings of women’s shoes. In 1961, an early manifestation was
his Dick Tracy, an enlarged version of the comic strip that was placed in
the window of Lord & Taylor’s department store. He followed in his own
footsteps to keep going in the ever-so-famous “pop art” track. Warhol’s use
of images are so close to the images themselves, thanks to the photographic
silkscreen technique, which is a process of applying the same image over
and over again without changing the original. In 1963, he began turning film
into his next aesthetic. He was the recorder of the world around him. Warhol
saw this world as populated by hustlers of various sorts, motivated largely
by money and the goods it would buy. Later that next year, he started to
experiment in underground film. In the late 70’s he began to use sex and
nudity to gain attention in his films. Whether this was moral or not; it
did, however, work. The rest of his short life was spent visiting with
celebrities and keeping up with the world’s times. He tried to understand
how the rest of the world saw things, but just never got there. Sadly, Warhol
died of a heart failure on March 9, 1987, still wearing his famous blond
hair wig.
Andy’s diaries are not actual written records of his day to day accounts,
but they are audio recordings of his phone conversations to Pat Hackett every
Monday through Friday (from Wednesday, November 24, 1976 to Tuesday, February
17, 1987, just weeks before his death). Warhol originally intended these
daily records to be documentation of his minor “business” expenses. He was
just audited and felt the need to be extra careful. “In a word it was a diary.
But whatever its broader objective, its narrow one, to satisfy tax auditors,
was always on my mind” (Warhol xvi). Later on, he felt the diaries were a
great way to explain his everyday occurrences for more than a decade of his
life. This view of his life from his eyes is probably the most balanced view
ever given. He may have changed since the 60’s, but it is still the truest
representation of Andy, himself. He never expressed the key happenings of
his life; it’s as if we, the readers, already knew them. He just usually
mentions the quick everyday type things such as a cab ride to uptown New
York.
The first major influence on Andy Warhol’s life was the stepping stone of
his artistic career, his enrollment in and completion of Carnegie Institute
of Technology with a bachelor degree in pictorial design. After graduating
he moved out to New York City, where his life blossomed. He lived for a couple
of years with Philip Pearlstein, who he had met at school. Warhol, with his
education centered around design, set out to begin his career on the right
foot. He started doing drawings for advertisements in a women’s shoe catalog.
It may not have been much to brag about, but it was at least something he
could learn and gain from the experience given to him. Andy may have acquired
his use of media exploited images through his beginning attempts at
commercialism. He knew what sold to society, whether he agreed with it or
not. He continued on with simplified pop art and he made it famous. He is
the person most people think about when pop art is mentioned. Through his
advertising projects, he was conditioned to think only in glorification of
people, products, and style. One of his popular works, the silkscreen of
the Campbell’s Soup Can, is an example of this. It is an image that everyone
is familiar with, and it is so common that sometimes it is overlooked. Many
times, Andy took something simple and glorified it. This is how he made his
designing skills useful in promotion. “One would compare Warhol to the pictorial
hyper-realism of Norman Rockwell, and to the surrealism of Marcel Duchamp,
and the radicalism of Jasper Johns” (Sagan 1).
A second major influence in Andy Warhol’s life is his participation in the
underground film scene. It started in 1963, when he called himself “the recorder
of society around him” (Moritz 590). He would find people for his movies
in a club-type warehouse called Max’s Kansas City. Every night, celebrities
of art, fashion, music, and underground film-making crowds gathered in the
back corners of Max’s to try their chance at working with Warhol. In 1968,
he was nearly killed by a woman who was in one of his short films. She shot
him on the side of his chest, but fortunately he was not killed. He still
continued to make films; such famous ones are “Eat,” “Haircut,” “Sleep,”
“Kiss,” and “Empire.” He would make them boring on purpose to possibly prove
a point. Again it was glorifying something thought of as being extremely
pointless. In the late 70’s he began to use sex and nudity, featuring films
concerning sexual bondage. He may have been simply looking for a shock value
content. Many artists work off shock value, it takes only the true to admit
it and still continue with it.
The last and most important influence on Warhol was his mother, Julia Warhola.
When Andy first arrived in New York, he would share apartments with friends
and acquaintances. Eventually he could afford a place of his own. Then his
mother suddenly arrived in town and moved in with him. Her reason was to
look after him. She would constantly keep an eye out for a wife for Andy.
Little did she know he was interested in the opposite sex for marriage. Andy
appreciated his mother, and never wanted to explain how she had an impact
on him. Maybe it was the fact that she meant well, and tried her hardest
to take care of him. She lived with him on 89th Street and Lexington Avenue
until 1971. By then, suffering from senility, she required constant care
and Andy sent her back to Pittsburgh to be cared for by his two brothers,
John and Paul. After suffering a stroke, she died in her nursing home in
1972. Andy did not except the fact too kindly. He would even go as far to
say his mother was doing fine, when people would ask about her, even though
she had already passed away. Andy stayed quiet and tried to hide himself
from the rest of society. He would avoid emotional interaction as much as
he could. He did this so he could “shrink away from human touch” (Moritz
591). A man who started his life shy and uncomfortable, blossomed into an
outspoken artist, now finished his life with feelings even worse than the
beginning of his life.
After extensive research I found that Andy had much more to his life than
I had originally expected. He was involved in the classic rock band The Velvet
Underground, with famous singer Lou Reed. He actually even designed a few
of the album covers. Most people remember the self-entitled album with the
picture of a banana on it. Directly to the left of the banana read the words
“peel me.” If one would peel it, it would reveal the pink insides of a banana.
Truly a work of Andy, I must say. Another thing I found was that Andy was
not only homosexual, but he was “omnisexual.” It was rumored he had no problem
with sex with anyone or anything. Men, women, animals, you name it, it was
probably thought of. And last of all I found he was unusually kind and
appreciative to others, especially the ones who worked for him. Pat Hackett,
his editor, once said that she has never met a person who says “thank you”
as much as Andy does.
Not once have I been more informed on a person’s life. In the beginning I
thought I knew a lot about. This research on Andy Warhol definitely reinforced
my positive view of him. It may have possibly enhanced my appreciation for
him as well. I enjoyed the honesty of the entire diary. Nothing was hidden
from the reader and I felt as informed as a good friend of his would feel.
His life is an interesting one and I believe more people should try to
investigate other lives of the unusual. It expands your own viewpoints to
accept those of others.
Many critics have different viewpoints on Warhol’s autobiography. He was
still appreciated by those who understood his ideas. “But he had to have
had some sense of history, or he wouldn’t have left the diaries behind to
try to explain everything to future generations” (Plagens 1732). Some realize
that the diaries are rather boring, but seem to see the true Andy come through
in the entries. “Despite their virtuoso triviality, their naive snobbery
and their incredible length, the diaries are not without a certain charm”
(Amis 1732). Others saw the diaries as a simplistic record of events. “His
diaries are more or less just records of who went where and did what with
whom, that anybody else who’d been along could have kept” (Plagens 1732).
It’s too bad he didn’t start the diaries earlier in his life, such as the
60’s, “when it would have been more interesting to know what he did and whom
he was with, instead of waiting until 1976 to begin” (Plagens 1732). Some
even complained of the editing job done by Pat Hackett. “One problem with
the diaries is their postmodern polish, such as the casual proofreading and
editing” (Trebay 1732). The reason the editor didn’t fit up to par was the
mere fact she wanted it to sound how Andy explained the day. “…still the
book is great social history with its lip-smacking tales of loveless, sexless
marriages, its gimlet-eyed view of other people’s success, and its rampant
unclosetings” (Trebay 1732). I, myself, found the book very entertaining
and a great nonchalant look at the famous and their everyday lives. It may
have been organized better and condensed a bit, but none-the-less it was
still interesting and kept me reading.
318