Реферат на тему To What Extent Did The Home Front
Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-23Поможем написать учебную работу
Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.
To What Extent Did The Home Front In Britain Affect The Outcome Of The Second World War Essay, Research Paper
To what extent did the Home
Front in Britain affect the outcome of the Second World War? In September 1939 Britain went to
war against Germany, the war lasted until 1945 in Europe. Throughout this time
there was always on front, which was constant, this was the home front. The
home front was the front at which the British people were involved. Those who
were not fighting were expected to work for the British war gain and to support
the war fully. They were also expected to make some sacrifices for the good of
the country. In this essay I will be examining to what extent the home front
and the people on it affected the outcome of the war for Britain. I will be
examining different factors including those affecting production and those
affecting morale. There are a number of factors
affecting production and output these included union militancy, morale and how
the industries were controlled. A case study that can be used to best
illustrate the factors is the coal industry. The coal industry employed 1 man
in 20 during the war. There was a lack of technology therefore many men were
needed. The coal industry had a history of union militancy and striking going
back to the general strike in 1926. Worried about strikes and the effect they
could have on the British war effort Churchill banned strikes and set-up a
national arbitration tribunal, which would attempt to solve disputes. This did
little to stop the strikes and in 1043 1,800,000 working days were lost to
strikes with 1,875 separate strikes. This number increased in 1944 with
3,700,000 days being lost through 2,194 separate strikes. There was a drop in
coal production, which was not beneficial for the British war effort. The
government blamed the large number of strikes and absenteeism whereas the
miners blamed the loss of skilled workers to the army. The media agreed with
the government and argued that the strikers were holding back the war and
holding back the invasion of France. Overall even though there were a large
number of strikes production espcially munitions production was never halted
due to a lack of coal. Because of the large numbers of men
who had joined the army at the beginning of the war there were a large number
of job positions left open which need to be filled. At the beginning of the war
Chamberlain called for women to become volunteer workers to help the British
war effort. 30,000 enrolled but many were not found jobs and returned to the
dole queue. Ernest Bevin the minister of trade and industry was reluctant to
employ women but when it became apparent that another 2 million workers would
be needed in 1940 he re-introduced conscription for female workers. Many women
disliked war work because it detracted from their work in the home. Also women
had to suffer prejudice as there was no equal opportunities for example they
were only paid 60% of the male wage. This lack of equal opportunities did
little to help the female morale. The women?s work was key to the British war
effort as they were involved in all the major war industries such as armaments
manufacture. The population of Britain was much
more involved in the war and the war industries than in the First World War.
Churchill said ? whole of the warring nations are not only soldiers but the
entire population?The workmen are soldiers with different weapons.? This state
was sometimes described as a ?total war?. In 1939 with the declaration of war
there was a mass evacuation of people from the major cities in Britain. Many
people believed that there would be widespread bombings of the major cities so
it was arranged that 3.5 million people would be evacuated to so called
reception areas. The main area to be evacuated was London. There were a number
of problems with the evacuation. People had little idea of where they were
going and therefore could not prepare. The reception areas also had problems
often there were to many evacuees for houses or to few evacuees for houses.
This was due to poor organisation by the government. It was not only people who
were evacuated works of art from different art galleries were evacuated out of
cities. The pictures from the National Gallery were evacuated to a slate cave
in Wales. The rich usually evacuated themselves to countryside hotels or to
America. The royal family was advised to evacuate themselves to their colony in
Canada but they refused. The evacuation had a good effect on the war effort as
it increased the morale of troops knowing that their loved ones were not at
risk in the town and cities. This gave them peace of mind. One effect of the war, which was
said to have ?transformed life more than any other?, was the blackout. The
blackout involved cutting out all artificial light escaping into the
atmosphere. This was to reduce the effectiveness of the German bombing raids,
as they could not identify targets. The blackout also had a large effect on the
people of Britain, within the first month there was an increase in the number
of road accidents by 100% per-cent. By October 1939 the government realised
that they were causing more problems than they were solving so the blackout
laws were relaxed. The blackout also led to the banning of certain activities
because they led to the congregation of large numbers of people and could lead
to large numbers of casualties if hit by a bomb. These included cinemas, football
stadiums, and theatres. This led to decrease in public morale and a reduction
in support for the war effort as people were being denied their leisure
activities. Therefore the laws on this were also relaxed. The government in 1939 with the
outbreak of war introduced rationing. Many things were rationed including food,
petrol and clothing. Rationing was introduced to introduce the British people
to the idea of limitation from the outset of the war even though there was
enough food not to have to ration people. It was also introduced to bring an
idea of equality to the war and to break down the class barriers. Everybody was
rationed including the Royal Family. This was to avoid a struggle between the
classes so that people could concentrate on the war effort. It would also
prevent the rich buying up food supplies. In conclusion it could be argued
that the role of the home front in the outcome of the Second World War was
huge. The home front?s role in the British army and there morale and supplies
was key. And therefore there role in the war overall was also key. We believe
that without the support of the home font in the war the British army would not
have won the war, as there would have been poor morale and a lack of supplies.