Реферат на тему Comparison Between Swifts Gullivers Travels And Orwells
Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-02Поможем написать учебную работу
Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.
Comparison Between Swift?s ?Gulliver?s Travels? And Orwell?s ?Animal Farm Essay, Research Paper
George
Orwell (1903-1950), or Eric Arthur Blair as he was formerly known, was born in
Bengal, India.? His father was a minor
British official in the Indian Civil Service; his mother was the daughter of an
unsuccessful teak merchant in Burma.? ??????? Orwell?s
family returned to England in 1911, and lived at Shiplake in Oxfordshire.? At the age of eight, Orwell attended St
Cyprian?s, a prep school where he was distinguished by his intellect and
poverty.? ??????? Orwell
realised his urge for writing from a very early age and wrote many poems and
stories, two of which were printed in the local newspaper.? However, he
did not have any siblings of a similar age in his childhood and became lonely;
he developed ?disagreeable mannerisms?, that made him an unpopular child at his
school.? Orwell described this miserable
period in an essay ?Such Such were the Joys? The essay was written as a
suggestion by his school friend Cyril Connolly who was also destined to pursue
a literary career and became one of Orwell?s most useful contacts.?? From 1917
to 1921, Orwell attended Eton, one of England?s leading schools, where he
published his first writings as college periodicals.? Authors he read included Jonathan Swift, whose satire would be a
key element in Orwell?s style.? Like Swift,
Orwell moved countries several times and during his enlistment with the Indian
Burma Police he realised how much against their will, the Burmese were being
ruled by the British.? Later he
was to recount his experiences and his reactions to Imperial rule in his novel
?Burmese days? (1934) and in two autobiographical sketches ?Shooting an
elephant? and ?A Hanging?.? After being
injured, Orwell resigned from the Imperial Police and declaring himself an
anarchist, took cheap lodgings in London?s East end, living among the poor
labourers. He spent
some time in Paris, and then in 1931 he went back to England, moving around the
country eventually settling at a farm.?
All these experiences provided the material of Orwell?s first book,? ?Down and Out in London?.? Through the
years, Orwell wrote many more novels and his anarchism settled into a more
mature socialism.? He made a tour in
order to gather material for a book on the social conditions in the
industrialised cities and improvised mining communities in the North of
England.? He also
kept a diary during February and March 1936 that would form the basis of this
book ?The Road to Wigan Pier?. ??????? In
1936, Orwell rented the small general store in Wallington, which he ran as a
business with his wife.?? Although they
left Wallington in 1940, Orwell visited often and the village?s most enduring
legacy was its Manor farm; this would form the basis for ?Animal Farm?.? Like
Gulliver?s Travels, Animal Farm can be enjoyed on more than one level, as
readers who have no intellectual experience of the political parallels will
still receive the raw emotional jolt.?
Regardless of whether you know a lot about Russia and the revolution,
?Animal Farm? has an absorbing story which adults and children should find
enjoyable. However,
knowledge of the political comparisons helps bring about a better overall
understanding of the book and help you to appreciate Orwell?s motivation for
writing.? Orwell?s original intention
for writing was to ?expose some lie? and his initial concern was to ?get a
hearing?. He realised, like Swift that the world held many political problems
which needed to be brought to the attention of the public, and found writing to
be the most effective and ?aesthetically pleasing? way.? Fortunately
for Orwell, he did not need to use the same level of subtlety in his writings
to avoid government intervention although he realised the power of satire and
employed it throughout the whole of ?Animal Farm?.? Both Orwell and Swift?s works are attacks on humanity in general
and both satirised certain individuals.?
In ?Animal Farm?, Orwell?s characters
are a representation of historical people who were involved in the Russian
revolution of 1917.? For example
Napoleon, the large fierce looking Berkshire boar is a satire of Joseph
Stalin.? ?Snowball was a more vivacious
pig than Napoleon, quicker in speech and more intelligent?.? In this passage Orwell is comparing Stalin
to Leon Trotsky, another leader of the October revolution.? ??????? Napoleon
uses Squealer the pig as his propagandist because of Squealer?s excellent
persuasion skills.? Joseph Stalin also
used propaganda and this kept him on top of the Russian government.? Napoleon?s main advantage over controlling
the animals of the farm is his exploitation of the dogs.? Orwell uses them to represent the KGB or
perhaps more accurately, the bodyguards of Stalin.? Orwell almost speaks of the dogs as ?mindless robots? so
dedicated to Napoleon that they cannot really speak for themselves.? This is supported by Napoleon?s early and
suspicious removal of six puppies from their mother.? Orwell?s
satirisation of characters in his book goes into such detail that even
characters as frivolous as the pigeons represent important parts of the Russian
revolution. Early on in
the book, the pigs create seven commandments for all animals to abide by but
gradually; they change over time as the pigs become increasingly dominant.? The pigs prey on the weaknesses and
forgetfulness of the animals and slowly each commandment is altered in some
way.? For example, the commandment, No
animal shall drink alcohol, is changed to No animal shall drink alcohol to
excess after Napoleon gets drunk and subsequently has a hangover. Although the
animals generally do not realise it, the pigs are exploiting the animals into
living a life worse than how it was before the pigs took over. Another
example of Orwell?s satire is when the most powerful and perhaps gullible
animal, Boxer falls after the strains of building the windmill, and is taken
away in a glue cart much to the animals despair.? Squealer then goes on to tell them that the cart was for a
hospital and once again the animals are tricked.? The ironic fact is revealed when a crate of whisky arrives for
the pigs and the reader realises what they have done. After the
removal of Snowball by Napoleon at the beginning, Napoleon has acquired himself
a scapegoat for all the bad things that happen on the farm by blaming them on
Snowball.? For example, Napoleon
explains to the animals that the food shortages are because of Snowball
sneaking in at night.? At a gathering in
the barn, many animals come forward to explain that Snowball has been telling
them to cause trouble amongst the farm and Napoleon?s dogs kill them in front
of the other animals.? This is a most
likely to be a tactic of Napoleon to get the animals to say that, to reinforce
Snowball?s existence and act as a deadly warning of Napoleon?s power and authority. Like Swift,
Orwell uses humour as a part of satire in certain places to make a point.? Orwell?s humour is much more subtle, he
shows the pigs difficulty in getting to grips with human tools in a comical way
?it is not easy for a pig to balance on a ladder?.? Whereas Swift blatantly uses ?toilet humour? throughout which
caused much offence to certain people.?
Orwell?s writing style is similar to Swift?s in that it is clear, strong
and precise.? These qualities are vital
for a book where it is important for the reader to understand the message they
are trying to convey.? It also increases
the impact and can be very influential ?There was a deadly silence. Amazed,
terrified, huddling?. ??????? On
a personal level, I enjoyed ?Animal Farm? more because of its simple persuasive
style, which I found absorbing and kept me interested right to the very
end.? However, I also enjoyed
?Gulliver?s Travels? because it is so different to any book I have read and its
subtle, yet provocative satirical points enhanced the pleasure of reading it.