Реферат на тему Chronicle Of A Death Fortold By Gabriel
Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-03Поможем написать учебную работу
Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.
Chronicle Of A Death Fortold By Gabriel Marquez Essay, Research Paper
Chronicle of a Death Fortold, by Gabriel Marquez, is concerned with death in life and life in death.It was rainy on the day of Santiago Nasar?s murder, and yet by the account of others, it was not. His death is so mingled with illusory images that everything seems mystified: much like death itself. The fact that the story is about how a death consumes the lives of the entire town as well as the victim, shows that it is concerned with death in life and asks us to evaluate our own views.Not only is the story concerned with death in life on the literary level, but the people of the town feel obliged to honor and offer gifts to a bishop that doesn?t even like the town. It is perhaps because they fear if they do not keep their faith, they are putting in jeopardy their fate after death; this is the primary concern of all religions, life after death and fear of the unknown. “For years we couldn?t talk about anything else. . .and it was obvious that we weren?t doing it from an urge to clear up mysteries but because none of us could go on living without an exact knowledge of the place and the mission assigned to us by fate”(113).”
?All right, girl,? he said to her, trembling with rage, ?tell us who it was?. . .?Santiago Nasar,? she said”(53). Whether or not Santiago Nasar was the reason behind Angela Vicario?s lost honor, his death shapes and defines her life afterwards. Many in the town describe her as being a woman half in mourning and the narrator is amazed at how she ends up understanding her own life despite how much she was made to die in life(101).Chronicle of a Death Fortold makes us look at life and death and face uncertainty about our future. Because it questions death and our belief in religion, it depreciates, in a sense, our strong belief in the glories of afterlife. Like the narrator, maybe we, “couldn?t bring ouselves to admit that life might end up resembling bad literature so much”(102). It makes us think that we should be content now, and not later, and that the intermingling of life and death is not purely coincidental, but perhaps one is no greater than the other.