Реферат на тему Frankenstein Morality Essay Research Paper Frankenstein MoralityMorality
Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-03Поможем написать учебную работу
Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.
Frankenstein: Morality Essay, Research Paper
Frankenstein: Morality
Morality. It has been questioned by people, honored by people and
revered since the beginning of time. Yet even today not one person can say what
is morally right. It is a matter of opinion. It was Dr.Victor Frankenstein’s
opinion that it was alright to create a “monster”. Frankenstein’s creation
needed a companion. Knowing that his first creation was evil should the doctor
make a second? With the knowledge at hand, to Dr.Frankenstein, it is not at
all morally correct to bring another monster into the world.
Looking at this probelm with his family in mind, the doctor begins his
work on the second monster. The first monster threatened Frankenstein and even
his family. The monster angrily said to Frankenstein, “I can make you so
wretched.” (pg. 162) Trying to scare Frankenstein for not creating his mate the
monster resorted to threats. If the good doctor does create a companion for his
first creation he may be endangering others. “The miserable monster whom I had
created,” (pg.152) says Victor upon looking back at his work. If there is
another monster there will be twice the power and possibly twice the evil,
which could hurt or kill his family. When and if Frankenstein commits the moral
sin of creating another monster he may be rid of both monsters forever. “With
the companion you bestow I will quit the neighbourhood of man,”(pg 142) promises
the morally corrupt monster to the doctor upon the completion of his partner.
When the doctor, if and when he, finished his first creation’s mate there is a
chance that the monsters will not keep their promise and stay in Europe envoking
fear into townfolk.
The good doctor, trying to act morally, destroys the monster for the
good of the world. The monsters can potentially take over whatever they please.
“A race of devils would be propegated,”(pg. 163) thinks Frankenstein to himself
in his study. The monsters, if powerful enough, could possibly take over Europe.
Frankenstein realizes that he can not possibly doom the world to benefit
himself. “Shall I, in coold blood, set loose upon the earth a daemon..”(pg.
162) argues Frankenstein with his creation. It is not morally right for one
person to unleash such a terror on the world to benefit only himself and his
family. Frankenstein will not let any example change his mind on the point
that the monster is and will always be morally corupt. Continuing on his point
that the monster was too evil to duplicate, Frankenstein says, “Your threats
cannot move me to do an act of wickedness; but they confirm me in determination
of not creating you a companion in vice.”( pg. 163) Frankenstein will not
sacrifice his morallity because of persuation from a monster. Although
beholding the threat of death and misery Frankenstein held his ground and did
not sacrifice his moral.
When and if Frankenstein creates another monster he can not feel as if
he has done the morally right thing. From creating the monster Frankenstein
will some how be making people other than himself unhappy. ” I consent to your
demand, on your solem oath to quite Europe forever, and every other place in the
neighbourhood of man,”(pg. 143) says Frankenstein as he sees the power that the
two could possibly possess. The good doctor sees that with his own hands he
could possibly scar the world forever. The doctor wants, if anyone, himself to
be unhappy instead of all of man kind. “Begone! I do break my promise,” (pg.
162) states the doctor angrily. Not thinking about himself but the world
unselfishly breaks his promise to the monster. Possessing such a great mind the
doctor is able to realize that a greater evil will be realesed upon the earth
then upon himself. “Your threats cannot move me to do an act of wickedness,”(pg.
162) says the doctor as he argues his point with his creation. The doctor sees
that a greater and more horrible result can come from him making the second
monster than not.
With the knowledge at hand, to Dr.Frankenstein, it is not at all
morally correct to bring another monster into the world. On the one hand if the
second monster was created Frankenstein’s family would be saved. By the same
token the rest of the world could be forced to bow before two hideous monsters.
The problem, making or not making the second monster, played heavily on
Frankenstein’s mind, possibly caused his brief lapse into the realm of the
insane. Even though Frankenstein began his work for the good of man his
experiment ended up hurting himself and his family.