Реферат

Реферат на тему Hamlet Revenge Or Scruples Essay Research Paper

Работа добавлена на сайт bukvasha.net: 2015-06-04

Поможем написать учебную работу

Если у вас возникли сложности с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой - мы готовы помочь.

Предоплата всего

от 25%

Подписываем

договор

Выберите тип работы:

Скидка 25% при заказе до 22.11.2024


Hamlet: Revenge Or Scruples? Essay, Research Paper

Hamlet: Revenge or Scruples?

Andrew Brian

?’Vengeance is mine,’ sayith the Lord?. What does this mean? I believe

what the Christians meant it to mean is that we, as humans, have no right to

seek revenge, that only ?the Lord? has the right to decide when to take revenge.

We say this, but do we follow it? No, I think not. We all try to take revenge

into our own hands, in one form or another.

Revenge is one strong theme that holds throughout ?Hamlet?. We see

Prince Hamlet try to execute a kind of private vengeance, an eye for an eye,

which is completely opposite of the Christian teachings. Hamlet is a man who

believes in heaven and hell and who feels that a man who challenges divine

ordinance will ultimately face judgment. We might look at the ghost of the late

king Hamlet as the part of us that wants to take vengeance into our own minds.

Like the little voice in our heads that tells us to do something, when in our

hearts we know it is wrong.

When Horatio, Barnardo, and Marcellus tell Hamlet of their sighting of

the ghost, Hamlet agrees to join them that night and see if he can observe the

ghost firsthand and possibly speak with it. That night when Horatio, Marcellus,

and Hamlet sight the ghost, it beckons Hamlet to leave the other two and speak

to it in privacy. Hamlet follows, despite the protests of the others, who fear

it may be an evil spirit, disguising as King Hamlet in order to gain their trust.

Horatio suggests that it may lead him astray and then “assume some other

horrible form / Which might deprive your sovereignty of reason / And draw you

into madness…” (I, iv, 80-82). Hamlet insists on listening to the message of

the ghost. Although he does not state it, perhaps Hamlet subconsciously

considers that Horatio is right, that the ghost is indeed a false messenger sent

to trouble him.

Hamlet does not kill Claudius immediately following his encounter with

the ghost because he is unsure of the ghost’s accusations of Claudius and does

not want to murder him without proper motive. Hamlet would suffer in the eyes of

the people if he were to murder Claudius, the reigning king, and claim his

motive was the words of a ghost. Hamlet already disapproves of Claudius due to

his marriage to Hamlet’s mother, Gertrude, so soon after the death of her first

husband, King Hamlet. Prince Hamlet feels that the widow did not sufficiently

mourn and that the marriage is incestuous due to the relation between the late

husband and the new groom. The timing of the marriage causes Hamlet to suspect

that Claudius and Gertrude had an affair during her marriage with King Hamlet.

Despite this, most Danes see nothing wrong with the marriage and express no

suspicions about King Hamlet’s death. Because he must expose Claudius’s murder

of King Hamlet in order to legitimize his own murder of Claudius, Hamlet can not

immediately kill Claudius and explain his motive later, once he is guilty of

murder. He must first find proof that Claudius did in fact do wrong that brought

about his father’s death.

Some of Hamlet’s opportunities for killing King Claudius are poorly

timed, most notably following Claudius’s expression of alarm after watching an

enactment of the murder of Gonzago. This is a time when Claudius’s image has

been tarnished and the people may be suspicious of him in connection to the

death of King Hamlet. However, when Hamlet goes to the royal chambers to

confront him, but finds Claudius kneeling in prayer.

Now might I do it, now he is a-praying,

And now I’ll do ?t. And so he goes to heaven,

And so am I revenged. That would be scanned:

A villain kills my father, and for that,

I, his sole son, do this same villain send

To heaven.

Why, this is hire and salary, not revenge.

He took my father grossly, full of bread,

With all his crimes broad blown, as flush as May;

And how his audit stands who knows save heaven.

But in our circumstance and course of thought

?Tis heavy with him. And am I then revenged

To take him in the purging of his soul,

When he is fit and seasoned for his passage?

No.

Up sword, and know thou a more horrid hent.

(III, iii, 77-93)

Hamlet decides that if he were to kill Claudius during prayer, Claudius

would be sent to heaven, which would not be the proper revenge he seeks, so

instead, Hamlet decides to wait and take his life at a time he is in sin. Hamlet

hesitates and analyses the situation of each assassination opportunity in a

likewise manner. Instead of simply acting on an opportunity he considers each

consequence of the timing and circumstances; each time he decides, “The time is

out of joint” (I, v, 210).

After promising his father’s ghost that he will gain revenge on Claudius

for the “foul and most unnatural murder” (I, v, 31), Hamlet lets opportunities

to murder Claudius pass by, waiting for a time when all will realize he is right

in the act so that Claudius will die in shame. He hesitates because he is unsure

the ghost was indeed his father’s ghost, he can not be sure that Claudius did

murder King Hamlet, and because there are times when Claudius’s soul and/or

public image would benefit from Hamlet’s deed, thus he would not die a villain’s

shameful death. In the end Hamlet does accomplish this goal of revenge and

Claudius is known to be the villain, but due to the delay in the murder, both

Hamlet and his mother, Queen Gertrude, also join the two kings among the realm

of the deceased.

I believe that humans have a craving for revenge and this unquenchable

thirst is depicted in ?Hamlet?. But I do not feel that anyway, man or god, has

the right to take revenge. I believe that this is one wall that Humanity must

climb before it is to reach the next plain of evolution. We need to look past

what others do and try to show them why it is wrong and how they not only hurt

others, but themselves as well. When we become one as the human race, then we

shall be able to move out of the rut we have been in for centuries. ?How we

approach other people determines how quickly we evolve, how quickly our life

questions are answered. You must be completely open as are the people who bring

you messages. They will help you by opening you up. And they will fill you

with warmth and energy.? (The Celestine Prophecy) I do not remember seeing

Hamlet trying to understand his step-father, nor did he try to help him see what

he had done wrong. No, he only saw anger and hatred. He let this hatred eat

him inside and control his actions. So I see ?Hamlet? as a reflection of the

rut that humanity is stuck in. So I now end with this one question; ?do two

wrongs equal a right one??


1. Биография на тему Антон Брукнер Bruckner
2. Реферат на тему Nike Essay Research Paper In 1958
3. Реферат Методы проведения полимеризации
4. Контрольная работа на тему Топливно энергетический комплекс и его роль в развитии народного хозяйства России
5. Реферат на тему Feminism Essay Research Paper Of what historic
6. Реферат Основные компоненты графического пользовательского интерфейса GUI
7. Реферат Конфликт культур
8. Реферат Дивизия Герман Геринг
9. Курсовая Право міжнародних організацій
10. Сочинение на тему Лермонтов м. ю. - Мастерство писателя в изображении истории.