Building Of Dwelling Houses In Estonia Essay, Research Paper

Building of Dwelling Houses in Estonia

Not wanting to analyze the building of dwelling houses in Estonia inefficiently

and seemingly scientifically (where would I have got competent statistics from),

I simply try to express the thoughts which are connected with that topics

somehow and have come into my mind. What kind of ?scientific? analysis it could

be or who should make it, if even the architectural critics seem not to manage

with the simplest things. That reminds me an article in the EE some time ago

about a Finnish lady (naturally in Finland) completing or taking her doctor’s

degree. She was examining Finnish post-war modern house, it’s morphology, the

structure of the Finnish family, the connections between them and making

conclusions which extend to this day. Those observations about architecture were

much more smarter than those that the most of self-confident architects could do.

Unfortunately it has to be confessed that I don’t remember such a research work

or sentiments in Estonian science, but no doubt, they could be necessary. The

typology of the houses used by most of the architects goes back to the living

model of the middle class at the end of the 19th century. That model was

idealized and carried on through a hundred of years up to the end of this

century. No doubt that our living style is changing ? repeating banalities:

paradigm changes ? as well as the composition and make-up of the family. There

was a news in a newspaper about Estonia which declared that 50 % of the children

are illegitimate (it is possible, of course, that some parents live together

without getting married officially) and 12,5 % of the born children know nothing

about their fathers. The living with grandparents is not so popular any more.

(As to the models of living it is worth of observing what has happened in North-

America ? though some europercentage followers don’t accept that ? it may happen

that we will be on the same development level soon. In that country the grown-up

children don’t want to live with their fathers and mothers, at least

statistically). Even such an every day activity as cooking is changing

essentially. An apartment or house is not a small production unit with its

storages, kitchen and dining room any more. The kitchen can be as presentable as

the dining room, also the furniture and the quality of the activities, they can

become more melted. There are some theorists who admit that not only eating but

washing procedures as well will leave the house to so-called town-social level.

In the house there will be only a bed, a computer for communication and toilet.

It won’t happen so soon, but one has to keep an eye on that branch of

development. Talking into account the above mentioned statements it seems rather

logical that the present day ?style of living? which is monofunctionally divided

into the units, should be replaced by a multifunctional and more universal room.

The architects can make their conclusions if they want to. The society is coming

more and more complicated, more individual-centered / individualized and that

ought to be reflected in the typological and functional development of the house

/ apartment. The situation in Estonia is a bit curious just now perhaps even

ridiculous. On the one hand we have been left a huge amount of apartments ?

living units, on the other hand these don’t satisfy the real needs of the

society any more. The problem doesn’t lie in the apartment or house, but in that

complete, and if you wish, harmonious world where these houses are situated. And

that is why it is very difficult to prevent Lasnam?e from turning to a ghetto.

The houses can be heated outside and apartments decorated inside, but it gives

satisfaction for a short time only. The single coquettish villages built in the

old districts between the houses look strange. The dissonance doesn’t exist

between the houses themselves but between the styles of living. The groups of 5

- 10 houses in the picturesque landscape at the seaside also can’t create the

complete society if they are situated next to the fishery and sawmills. There

are some districts in Estonia where the small houses with more complete

treatment have come into being. The suburb romantic idyll is ruling there, also

mentally as the motto of the area is to be similar and alike, with no any

differences from the thoughts of dear neighbors. Those so-called new-rich who

have enough money to build need the house as the symbol of status and they

actually don’t value the environment.

I would like to pay attention to the matter that has annoyed me for some time. I

can’t understand these critics who treat the houses on the steep banks of

Tabasalu with irony, calling them bad PM and admitting that the functionality

with stylistics originating from the 20ies is not so much PM, and a better one.

Of course, that is the question of taste. But if we don’t think the stylistics

to be the most important and do not throw away inevitably everything ?American?;

then to be honest, those houses ? purely morphologically ? are composed very

nicely if compared with sisters built somewhere else. The main trouble in that

area results in so-called planning, or if you wish ? town building.

Unfortunately it seems that it is not yet the right time to discuss that

complicating matter in Estonia. Mainly the highway engineers are handling these

problems and town building as the complex of cultural decisions hasn’t been

discussed. Actually there is a disagreement between the frequency and character

of the houses ? that is where to look for main mistakes. But behind that are the

desires of the customers, difficulties in getting the ownership of land,

stereotype thinking of the planning architect ? our cultural background

altogether. If to think about the future, keeping an eye on the same cultural

background, I have to say that the Estonians, if to express decently, are not

too keen to fight the challenge of age (by the way, an excellent opportunity for

the apologists of modernism) and taking use of that characteristics at least

younger architects could accept the possibilities offered by present time.

Certainly not everybody likes these possibilities and only a few real estate

agents will be interested, but according to my own experience there are some of

them, in Estonia too.

It is also important that looking at the things otherwise and spreading that

vision we can reach the situation where the words ?cheap? and ?ecological? have

great value. And considering our relatively poverty it is not a bad result at

all.