Candide Essay, Research Paper

In Candide, Voltaire sought to point out the flaws of Gottfried William von Leibniz’s theory of optimism and the hardships brought on by the inaction toward the evils of the world. Voltaire’s use of satire, and its techniques of exaggeration and contrast highlight the evil and brutality of war and the world in general when men are meekly accepting their fate. Leibniz, a German philosopher and mathematician of Voltaire’s time, developed the idea that the world they were living in at that time was “the best of all possible worlds.” This systematic optimism shown by Leibniz is the philosophical system that believed everything already was for the best, no matter how terrible it seemed. In this satire, Voltaire showed the world was full of natural disasters and brutality. Voltaire also used contrast in the personalities of the characters to convey the message that Leibniz’s philosophy should not be dealt with any seriousness.

Leibniz theorized that G-d, having the ability to pick from an infinite number of worlds, chose this world, “the best of all possible worlds. (http://www-personal.umich.edu/leibniz.htm)” Although Voltaire chose that simple quality of Leibniz’s philosophy to satirize, Leibniz meant a little more than just that. Even though his philosophy stated that G-d chose “the best of all possible worlds,” he also meant that G-d, being the perfection he is, chose the best world available to him; unfortunately it was a world containing evil (http://friesian.com/leibniz.htm). It seems that Voltaire wanted to ridicule Leibniz’s philosophy so much that he chose to satirize only the literal meaning and fatal acceptance of evil of Leibniz’s philosophy (http://www.ericjonas.com/features/candide/optimism/default.asp).

To get his point across in Candide, Voltaire created the character Dr. Pangloss, an unconditional follower of Leibniz’s philosophy. Voltaire shows this early in the novella by stating, “He proved admirably that there is no effect without a cause and that, in this best of all possible worlds” Pangloss goes on to say that everything had its purpose and things were made for the best. For example, the nose was created for the purpose of wearing spectacles. Because of his “great knowledge,” Candide, at this point a very naive and impressionable youth, regards Pangloss as the greatest philosopher in the world; a reverence that will soon be contradicted by contact with reality. The name Pangloss is translated as “all tongue or “windbag. As the story progresses, though, Pangloss loses faith in the philosophy. Although Pangloss suffered many hardships, he still sticks to the philosophy to avoid contradicting himself. Voltaire uses Pangloss and a contrasting character, Martin, to point out the shortcomings in Leibniz’s philosophy.

A contrast to the views of Pangloss is Martin, a pessimist. He is a friend and advisor to Candide after they meet during Candide s journey. Martin continuously tries to prove to Candide that there is little virtue, morality, and happiness in the world. When a cheerful couple is seen walking and singing, Candide tells Martin, “At least you must admit that these people are happy.” Martin answers Candide’s comment with the reply, “I wager they are not.” Martin suggests that Candide invite the couple to dine at his hotel. As the young girl, named Paquette, tells her story, Martin takes pleasure in knowing he has won the wager.

Another contrast to this “best of all possible worlds” is El Dorado. Voltaire describes El Dorado as an extremely peaceful and serene country. El Dorado, a place that is “impossible” to find, has no laws, jails, war, or need for material goods. Voltaire uses the mythical location as an epitome of the “best of all possible worlds.” It contrasts the real outside world in which war and suffering are everyday occurrences.

Another example of how Voltaire ridicules Pangloss’ optimistic philosophy is the mention of the Lisbon earthquake and fire. Even though the disastrous earthquake took over 30,000 lives, Pangloss still upheld his philosophical optimism by stating, “For all this is for the very best…For it is impossible that things should not be where they are.” The disaster in Lisbon affected Voltaire’s life so much that he wrote the Poem on the Lisbon Disaster, but Pangloss’ philosophy said that the Lisbon earthquake was necessary in the course of nature, and there was definitely a rationale for the situation.

War is another evil, which Voltaire satirizes in Candide. Voltaire used the Bulgarians and their brutality as a basis for his satire on war. Voltaire writes how Candide was captured by the Bulgarians and is given a choice “to be beaten thirty-six times by the whole regiment, or receive twelve lead bullets at once in his brain.” Being the “hero” he is, Candide chooses to run the gauntlet. Instead of the thirty-six times he was to run the gauntlet, our “hero” made it only two until he pleaded to the Bulgarians to smash in his head. Another satire of war included in Candide is the Bulgarians’ burning of the Abarian village “in accordance with the rules of international law.” Voltaire also shows his satire on war in that the Bulgarian soldiers do not just kill other people, they rape, disembowel, and dismember innocent women and children. In fact, Candide’s training as a soldier involved being brutalized and beaten. Voltaire uses this example to demonstrate the inhuman vulgarity of many quarrelsome groups. He thought that this torture was cruel and unjustified. If this were the “best of all possible worlds,” innocent people would not be harmed, and violent peoples such as the Bulgarians would not exist. Upon arrival in England, Candide witnesses another instance of brutality, the execution of an admiral because of his failure to win a battle. A reply to Candide’s questioning of the act is, “…it is a good thing to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others.”

Voltaire is mainly using the satires of human behaviors and institutions to exhibit the implausibilities of Leibniz s theory. He uses Pangloss, whose name translates to windbag as the main proponent of this philosophy. This shows how he doesn t lend much credence to the philosophy. Candide, easily influenced, blindly believes whatever Pangloss tells him and takes almost the entire story to realize that the world is not as perfect as Pangloss makes it out to be.