Pygmalion: Professor Higgins’ Philosophy Essay, Research Paper

Pygmalion: Professor Higgins’ Philosophy

Professor Higgins is seen throughout Pygmalion as a very rude man.

While one may expect a well educated man, such as Higgins, to be a gentleman, he

is far from it. Higgins believes that how you treated someone is not important,

as long as you treat everyone equally.

The great secret, Eliza, is not having bad manners or good manners or

any other particular sort of manners, but having the same manner for all human

souls: in short, behaving as if you were in Heaven, where there are no third-

class carriages, and one soul is as good as another. -Higgins, Act V Pygmalion.

Higgins presents this theory to Eliza, in hope of justifying his treatment of

her. This theory would be fine IF Higgins himself lived by it. Henry Higgins,

however, lives by a variety of variations of this philosophy.

It is easily seen how Higgins follows this theory. He is consistently

rude towards Eliza, Mrs. Pearce, and his mother. His manner is the same to each

of them, in accordance to his philosophy. However the Higgins we see at the

parties and in good times with Pickering is well mannered. This apparent

discrepancy between Higgins’ actions and his word, may not exist, depending on

the interpretation of this theory.

There are two possible translations of Higgins’ philosophy. It can be

viewed as treating everyone the same all of the time or treating everyone

equally at a particular time.

It is obvious that Higgins does not treat everyone equally all of the

time, as witnessed by his actions when he is in “one of his states” (as Mrs.

Higgins’ parlor maid calls it). The Higgins that we see in Mrs. Higgins’

parlor is not the same Higgins we see at the parties. When in “the state” Henry

Higgins wanders aimlessly around the parlor, irrationally moving from chair to

chair, highly unlike the calm Professor Higgins we see at the ball. Higgins

does not believe that a person should have the same manner towards everyone all

of the time, but that a person should treat everyone equally at a given time (or

in a certain situation). When he is in “one of those states” his manner is the

same towards everyone; he is equally rude and disrespectful to all. Yet when

minding his manners, as he does at the parties, he can be a gentleman.

If the second meaning of Higgins’ theory, that he treats everyone

equally at a particular time, is taken as his philosophy, there is one major

flaw. Higgins never respects Eliza, no matter who is around. In Act V of

Pygmalion, Eliza confronts him about his manner towards her. “He (Pickering)

treats a flower girl as duchess.” Higgins, replying to Eliza, “And I treat a

duchess as a flower girl.” In an attempt to justify this Higgins replies “The

question is not whether I treat you rudely, but whether you ever heard me treat

anyone else better.” Eliza does not answer this question but the reader knows

that Higgins has treated others better than Eliza. At the parties, for example,

Higgins is a gentleman to the hosts and other guest, but still treats Eliza as

his “experiment.”

Higgins could never see the “new” Eliza. Higgins only saw the dirty

flower girl that had become his “experiment.” Much like an author never sees a

work as finished, Higgins could not view Eliza lady or duchess. Since Higgins

knew where Eliza came from it was difficult for him to make her parts fit

together as a masterpiece that he respected.

Part of Higgins’ problem in recognizing the “new” Eliza is his

immaturity. He does not see her as what she is, he only sees her as what she

was. This immaturity is representative of Higgins’ childish tendencies that the

reader can see throughout the play. Higgins’ child-like actions can partially

explain the variations in his philosophy. Try to imagine Higgins as a young

teenager. A young Higgins, or any teenage boy for that matter, has a very

limited outlook. They treat everyone the same; depending on the situation they

may be little gentlemen or rude dudes. When around parents the teenager is rude

and inconsiderate yet when among his friends he a complete gentleman.

The adult Higgins’ actions are the same as the child.

355