Martin Luther King And Patrick Henry: Cry For Freedom Essay, Research Paper

Martin Luther King and Patrick Henry: Cry for Freedom

Robert Hernandez

English 11

Moore-4

October 4, 1996

Although Patrick Henry and Martin Luther King, Jr. are both skilled

orators and use similar rhetorical devices to appeal to their audiences, they

call for freedom for two totally different kinds of people. Both Patrick Henry

and Martin Luther King, Jr. show their strengths as speakers through their use

of these rhetorical devices. Among these are parallelism, allusions, metaphors,

and rhetorical questions. Both speakers use these devices well. Martin Luther

King, Jr. is infamous for using parallelism when he states, “Free at last, free

at last, thank God Almighty, we are free at last!” Martin Luther King, Jr. also

alludes to the Declaration of independence many times in his speech. “I have a

dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its

creed, ?We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created

equal.” These rhetorical devices help Martin Luther King, Jr. keep his audience

attentive and highly interested.

Patrick Henry uses biblical allusion when he states, “It is only in this

way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility

which we hold to God and our Country.” Another rhetorical device that Henry

uses well is imagery. A good example of Henry’s imagery is, “The next gale that

sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms!”

Henry uses these and many more devices to keep the attention and the open mind

of his audience who was mostly opposed to his viewpoint.

These two speeches were much more different than they are alike. The

main difference between the two speeches, in a general sense was that one calls

for a change through violence and war, while the other calls for a peaceful

solution. Patrick Henry’s speech to the Virginia House of Burgesses calls for a

revolution against Great Britain. This must have been a difficult speech for

Henry to deliver because he was speaking to a group of people who were opposed

to his ideals. They gave the speech pre-revolution and was an attempt to

persuade the Virginia delegates to solve the colonies’ problems with the British

through war.

Martin Luther King, Jr.’s speech was much different than Henry’s. First

of all, King was asking for a peaceful solution to the problems between the

white Americans and the African- Americans. This speech was also different from

Henry’s because he was speaking to a crowd that was supportive of what he had to

say. They aimed this speech, given on the Lincoln Memorial in the early 1960’s,

at persuading African-Americans to solve their problems with whites through a

peaceful method.

Both Patrick Henry and Martin Luther King, Jr.’s speeches had their

similarities and differences. Among their similarities are that both were good

orators. They displayed this through the good, similar rhetorical devices that

they used, and through the way their audience reacted to their speeches. Both

men were taking risks by speaking the ways and at the times they did speak.

Among the differences between the two speeches are the change that they are

causing, and the way in which the change is to be made.