The Crucible Vs Clinton Essay, Research Paper

Arthur Miller?s The Crucible and the scandal surrounding President Clinton can be compared in profusion. The old saying of history repeating itself is certainly proved true in this state of affairs (no pun intended), proving the timelessness of The Crucible. Key players utilized by Miller can be interpreted into many notorious faces portrayed by the media encircling our fearless leader. Although all comparisons are not players at all, but some merely concepts.

The most obvious comparison protrudes from this circumstance like a sore thumb. This is the correlation between President Clinton and John Proctor. The primary similarity in their characters is the act of unfaithfulness to their wives. Each, different in status, is looked upon by their communities as leaders. Many will follow in their example, which is exactly why Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Proctor both stood steadfastly by their husbands, regardless of how much information each was given.

For this reason of faithfulness in her husband, Elizabeth Proctor attempted to protect John by deceiving the court concerning the adulterous crime her husband committed. This deception was committed under oath in the court. In the same way, Clinton attempted to deceive the court and the American public in regard to his affairs with Lewinsky. His fib was orated under oath in the court also. Both fabricated to cover for one?s actions. Proctor did this to conceal her husbands condemned actions. Clinton did this to conceal his own condemned actions.

Abigail Williams and Monica Lewinsky are both united as the temptresses. They each saw what they desired and aggressively sought after it with complete disregard for the fact that it did not belong to them. Abigail Williams saw John Proctor as a noted man in the community that she wished to pursue a relationship with. She had no intention to lose him by him being hanged in the end. Similarly, Lewinsky observed Bill Clinton as a powerful man she coveted for herself. She probably never intended to sacrifice him to the court as she did. This terrible twosome lusted after something that was legally nor biblically theirs and lost it in the end.

The media is a fiercely authoritative force. Innumerable people are convinced that what the media portrays as the truth, must be. Likewise, Kenneth Starr is a commanding man. Those who do not understand his legalese, accept what he says as truth out of ignorance. In Miller?s The Crucible, an array of girls acted with the skill of the media and Starr. Many did not comprehend how such an assembly of fine young women could lie, so they accepted what was presented before the court as truth. The two portrayals of power exemplify how once someone finds a weakness in a gathering, they prey upon that, leaving none excused.

The Devil is associated with anything evil. In the same manner, sexual implications are treated accordingly. Such topics are socially improper to address in public, much less conduct. In The Crucible, countless people were said to have been seen with the Devil. As aforementioned, the Devil is present in all evil acts. Adultery, as displayed in the actions of President Clinton, is regarded an evil act, therefore the Devil is present. The collation between the Devil and sexual conduct is that it is the subject-matter of local conversation and gossip, but when it becomes personal the great veil is drawn.

As a result of this juxtaposition, the likeness between Arthur Miller?s The Crucible and the scandal surrounding President Clinton is clearly demonstrated. A plethora of instances have been displayed from Elizabeth Proctor to the Devil. The immortality of The Crucible is ceaseless. History is a series of events with no beginning, nor end; bound to repeat itself sooner or later. The only variances are the people and the circumstances, but analyzed down to chief principles are repetitions.